Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’ can Break Up the Big Banks with existing law!
Just yesterday how many DUers said this couldn't be done?
Specifically, he wants to use Section 121 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which gives regulators the power to break apart large financial institutions they think pose a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States.
http://www.dodd-frank-act.us/Dodd_Frank_Act_Text_Section_121.html
The Text of the Dodd-Frank Act
International Association of Risk and Compliance Professionals (IARCP)
Dodd Frank Act Section 121
SEC. 121. MITIGATION OF RISKS TO FINANCIAL STABILITY.
(a) MITIGATORY ACTIONS.If the Board of Governors determines that a bank holding company with total consolidated assets of $50,000,000,000 or more, or a nonbank financial company supervised by the Board of Governors, poses a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States, the Board of Governors, upon an affirmative vote of not fewer than 2?3 of the voting members of the Council then serving, shall
(1) limit the ability of the company to merge with, acquire, consolidate with, or otherwise become affiliated with another company;
(2) restrict the ability of the company to offer a financial product or products;
(3) require the company to terminate one or more activities;
(4) impose conditions on the manner in which the company conducts 1 or more activities; or
(5) if the Board of Governors determines that the actions described in paragraphs (1) through (4) are inadequate to mitigate a threat to the financial stability of the United States in its recommendation, require the company to sell or otherwise transfer assets or off-balance-sheet items to unaffiliated entities.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1576 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (57)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders’ can Break Up the Big Banks with existing law! (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Jan 2016
OP
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)1. Wait, we could do this now? Nt
elleng
(131,174 posts)3. The 'Board of Governors,'
not the President.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)5. So why are the board of governors
Not doing this? Aren't the top five banks are even larger today than they were back in 2008?
Uncle Joe
(58,444 posts)6. The President appoints the Board of Governors.
Appointments to the Board
By law, the president of the United States must make appointments to the Board that yield a "fair representation of the financial, agricultural, industrial, and commercial interests and geographical divisions of the country." The country is divided into 12 Federal Reserve Districts, and no two governors may come from the same District.
The governors are appointed for 14 years, and the terms are staggered, with one expiring on January 31 of every even-numbered year. A governor who has served a full 14-year term may not be reappointed, but someone who was appointed to complete an unexpired term may be reappointed to a full 14-year term. Once appointed, governors cannot be removed from office for their policy views.
The length of the terms and the staggered appointments process are intended to contribute to the insulation of the Boardand the Federal Reserve Systemfrom day-to-day political pressures to which it might otherwise be subject. If all governors serve full terms, a U.S. president would be able to appoint only two governors in a four-year presidential term and foura majority of the governorsduring eight years in office. In reality, however, many governors leave before completing their 14-year terms, and recent presidents have made more than one appointment to the Board every two years.
As stipulated in the Banking Act of 1935, one of the seven governors is appointed by the U.S. president to a four-year term as chairman. This selection must be confirmed by the Senate. The chairman serves as public spokesperson and representative for the Board, manager of the Board's staff, and chairman at Board meetings. Ben S. Bernanke was sworn in on February 1, 2006, as chairman and a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. He also chairs the Federal Open Market Committee, the System's principal monetary policymaking body. Chairman Ben Bernanke replaced Alan Greenspan, whose tenure spanned from August 11, 1987, to January 31, 2006.
https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed46.html
madokie
(51,076 posts)4. Yup sure could
Just have to have the will to do it is all.
I want it done and done now but I don't carry any weight, maybe since I give Bernie some money I'll get that wish once he's in the white house come January of '17
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)2. Good
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)7. The board of governors of the Federal Reserve
Omaha Steve
(99,758 posts)8. Yes
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)9. That doesn't seem very promising.
Omaha Steve
(99,758 posts)11. Well Hillary isn't talking about it
And she wanted Bernie to back her?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)10. K & R !!!