2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNate Silver: Obama could only win the popular vote
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/18/sept-17-electoral-college-may-not-help-obama/#more-34667timber84
(2,876 posts)you are still posting here. Still so 'concerned" I see.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)unblock
(52,253 posts)1.9% for the opposite result.
not very likely.
liberalmuse
(18,672 posts)I know re-election looks really good for our President, but it's not in the bag by all means. This post made my stomach drop to my feet, though.
struggle4progress
(118,295 posts)budkin
(6,703 posts)With the consistent electoral leads and swing state polling in his favor, and Romney's campaign in free fall, it's just not happening.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)that are probably similar to me getting hit by lightning on the way out to the car this afternoon.
Must be a slow day at the blog.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)If the democrats don't get these voter ID'S for people we can't rely on the courts because all these courts are mostly controlled by right wing judges
sasha031
(6,700 posts)last week he had Obama ahead in the electoral college.
I don't understand this change
JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)The OP is posting about the difference in the popular vote - the one Al Gore won.
But he failed to mention that as of 1:10 PM - Silver has Obama with 305 Electoral Votes. That's why the change isn't easy to understand . . .
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)lazy at best and intentionally dishonest at worst.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Doesn't mean it will happen.