Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 03:37 AM Dec 2014

What Makes Nonviolent Movements Explode?



http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/27765-what-makes-nonviolent-movements-explode

The scenario for confrontation offered by Occupy Wall Street fell into Sharp’s third category, and owing to this, it possessed a different tenor than the marches and rallies that had come before. Because the “One Nation Working Together” march had taken place on a weekend, and because it was viewed as a standard-issue march in Washington, DC — one of several major rallies that took place within just a few months in the nation’s capital — it could be easily overlooked, even through it brought out more than 175,000 people.

In the long run, the breadth of participation in a protest movement matters; but in the short term, a sense of drama and momentum can trump numbers. Occupy Wall Street involved a much smaller number of people, particularly at its beginning. Yet it set out to generate a much greater level of disruption. Activists intended to go to the investment banks in the heart of Manhattan’s financial district and erect an encampment on their doorstep, impeding the daily business of those most responsible for the economic crisis.

Although the police ultimately pushed protesters into a location several blocks from Wall Street itself, the occupation at Zuccotti Park effectively posed a dilemma for those in power. They could allow activists to hold the space indefinitely, permitting a staging ground for continual protests against the area’s financial institutions. Or police could act on behalf of the country’s wealthiest 1 percent and shut down dissent, a move that would perfectly illustrate the protesters’ claims about what American democracy had become. It was a no-win situation for the state.

While authorities pondered these unattractive options, the question of “how long will the occupation hold?” fostered a growing sense of dramatic tension for the public.

The tactic of occupation had other advantages as well. One was that it could be replicated. Somewhat jokingly, a few weeks in to the mobilization, organizers unveiled the slogan “Occupy Everywhere!” Much to their surprise, it actually happened: the disruptive impact of Occupy grew as encampments sprung up in cities throughout the country. They even sprouted internationally, as with Occupy London, which set up shop directly outside of the London Stock Exchange.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. Explode? Or Expand, like rising yeast dough?
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 08:35 AM
Dec 2014

Yeast dough expands as long as the food, water, and structural support are there. It infiltrates, when there's a crack.

Explosions occur when the release of energy pushes everything out of its way. It's a one-time, one way event.

90-percent

(6,829 posts)
2. The authoritarian state response to OWS
Tue Dec 30, 2014, 11:28 AM
Dec 2014

The authoritarian state response to OWS was profound in it's nature. The police really flirted with police brutality and ignoring protestors Constitutional Rights when OWS had some momentum a few years ago.

We can protest all we want as long as it's splintered and disorganized, the minute we appear to be actually effective at organizing a larger cohesive movement, that's when the militarized police with their eardrum exploding sound cannons and mace and pepper spray and rubber bullets and illegal choke holds will incite riots and whatever else to crush the dissent.

The great Chris Hedges has covered revolutions in Eastern Europe - his observation is that if ONE PERCENT of the population is engaged in revolutionary causes, it will trigger a revolution.

And right now I'm afraid to participate in protests for fear of physical harm and getting snagged in our stasi-like criminal justice system. Even among family and friends I'm starting to really feel like "I have to watch what I say."

The Oligarch's are turning the dial to eleven on quelling social unrest and dissident voices. Painful, because from my 60's baby boomer public education, I know a lot about the principles our country was founded on an it's painful to see our elected officials bulldoze over many of our former Constitutional Rights. They're perfectly comfortable stating on national TV that "Torture works and I'd do it again in a minute." Which speaks to the utter contempt they have for the rule of law and The Constitution that they took an Oath to uphold. I wonder what Oath's these people have taken that they actually follow? Is there a secret Oath taken by the leaders of the Military Industrial congressional Surveillance complex we should know about? Is there a Secret Oath to our DEEP STATE parallel government accountable to nobody but themselves?

It CAN happen here and IT IS happening here.

I think one of the few hopes left is collective action, which I think is impossible because there are so many special interest variants trying to fight the spread of Oligarchy - should I join the green party, should i join greenpeace, OWS, move-on and all the other hundreds of groups committed to social justice?

We need a Teddy Roosevelt for our times - somebody that will BUST THE TRUSTS effectively and for real. Well, we need a whole bunch of other things, cuz the wealthy authoritarians have been chipping away at Democracy at least since the Powell Memorandum of 1971 and then got going in full force once Reagan was in office.

Eizabeth? Bernie? And if they bail how about Alan Grayson?

-90% jimmy

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
4. I don't think having many different groups is necessarily a bad thing--
Sun Jan 4, 2015, 03:15 AM
Jan 2015

"so many special interest variants trying to fight the spread of Oligarchy - should I join the green party, should i join greenpeace, OWS, move-on and all the other hundreds of groups committed to social justice?"

we have different groups means we can follow our own critera. For ex, I choose to work with groups which are not allied with the Dem Party, like move-on, or those which are into electoral politics like the green party.

So I have a choice of other independent grass-roots groups.

Also I think we are seeing more and more groups coming together to work together.
And also a growing realization that "one-issue" will not get it.

In my town we started a group to become educated in direct action.
I have never been arrested, but want to be arrested, when it seems the correct thing to do. (Not that all people who do direct action plan to be arrested of course.)

We have a large membership of many different groups. We hope that this group can serve as a "clearing-house" so to speak of unifying and alerting each other to our various actions.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
5. I have a hope,
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 12:52 AM
Jan 2015

that the New Left will congeal into something like the old left. Personality politics, despite claims of "you too can be a millionaire" have been ringing hollow, and one group competing against another for political traction, or media attention or donations is part of the problem. Time to find common ground (hint: 99% = We are all working class).

A strong unity of groups would scare the shit out of the establishment, like the true old left (ie Commies and Socialist) that were badgered to death, and the young progressive minds of the 60's who were sold a hollow form of economic inclusion in the 70's. They became part of the problem. Back to the drawing board, and learn some history along the way.

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
6. Hi "Joe", ... well..I'm not sure we should use the Old Left as a model,
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:56 AM
Jan 2015

I don't think they were successful.
maybe you disagree.

I think that would did in the old left was the propaganda machine.

And the propaganda machine of yore has morphed into the "culture wars" of the '60's which continue today.
It is easy to point to bankers, cops, etc as the "enemy" but really the
"great unwashed masses" are the obstacle to change.

The ones who watch Karshians and survival reality show.
The ones who let the Earth and its creatures struggle for survival and die.

well... that is my morbid thought for the day lol.
happy new Year anyway.

(sometimes I think I should keep my yap shut if I have nothing constructive to say, other times I think I should share the 'wisdom of my years', FWIW.)

I always enjoy reading your thoughts.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
7. That is a very good post, thank you. I think OWS scared them to death. That was obvious.
Thu Jan 8, 2015, 03:27 AM
Jan 2015

Because the media kept their secrets, they probably thought the people were fooled. OWS grew so rapidly across the country and the globe, rather than the one city they had planned on, it became apparent that the public was seething at the corruption, that they do know and that they are capable of organizing.

The brutal crackdown made no sense. They were not violent, not promoting any kind of revolution, just exercising their constitutional rights to speak.

They succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. Their clever marketing of their message has created a new language explaining succinctly the inequality created by Wall St.

AND most of all, they exposed the police state even as they tried to silence them. And that has created even more anger.

I think boycotts and strikes should be the next phase. No point in going out on the streets and allowing them to bring out the tanks again.

That part WAS successful. Now it is necessary to conduct protests that do not provide them with the opportunity to arrest and harm people.

'Don't buy their stuff'. Corporations depend on money to hold on to their power.

When they start losing money and their stocks fall, THAT will affect them more than anything else.

And they can't very well arrest people for not buying their garbage, well, I don't think they can.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Occupy Underground»What Makes Nonviolent Mov...