Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(41,995 posts)
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 10:23 PM Nov 2012

Twilight is not feminist: it's female masochism

The Yahoo homepage streamed the red carpet premiere of Twilight: Breaking Dawn (Part 2) this week; the final film adaptation of Stephenie Meyer's series of teen vampire novels has finally escaped. The novels sold more than 100m copies, and are considered so significant that the Vatican, ever in search of devils, has attacked them – as it attacked the more benevolent Harry Potter novels before. But this is only partly a story about the power of marketing, even if a group of Boston schoolchildren decided that vampires did exist and, in a strange and tiny re-enactment of the Salem witch trials, accordingly looked for a victim to punish.

This is a story about the swelling of female masochism in popular fiction. Like Fifty Shades of Grey by EL James, which Meyer's novels inspired, Twilight is a loving-slave fantasy – Fifty Shades for teenage girls, except with vampires, because teenagers are too young for shades of grey, and prefer their disempowerment fantasies to look like fairytales. (Older women, I think, like them to look like expensive hotels or adverts for Audis.)




Two of Twilight's themes are particularly disturbing. One is the sexual violence of the central relationship. In a fascinating blog, the anonymous Live Journal user kar3ning detailed 15 signs of an abusive relationship, as named by the American National Domestic Violence hotline, and found many of them in Twilight. Kar3ning was attacked online by angry fans, in the same way you might be attacked for suggesting the Mr Men books were racist, but kar3ning is right.

There is the controlling male, the female with low self-esteem, the threats of suicide and murder, and so on. The day after her wedding night Bella examines the bruises on her body with something like aroused awe: "There was a faint shadow across one of my cheekbones, and my lips were a little swollen … the rest of me was decorated with patches of blue and purple."

The other is the anti-abortion agenda, which could be ignored were the premiere not live on Yahoo, as Meyer acts as the cultural arm of Abort67. Bella conceives a child on her wedding night. She resists all pleas to remove it: it breaks her ribs, her pelvis and, in an unconscious homage to early Ian McEwan, her spine; then it kills her. All this is noble, because Bella is a good mother and dies for her child as a loving martyr to the weakness of her own body. (The star of the movies, Kristen Stewart, is also rather unlucky in real life. She was photographed kissing a married man last year and, because abstinence porn can bleed into life, she is now talked of as "unbankable", Hollywood's own death, and her personal morality is – in ways the actresses of the 1950s would recognise – a public issue.)


http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/nov/16/twilight-not-feminist-sado-masochism


I thought this an interesting analysis and comparison. Many of the women I work with have read the "50 Shades" crap; one friend of mine, a psychiatric nurse practioner thinks the reason the books are so popular is because women haven't learned to communicate sexually, and the books open conversation they wouldn't otherwise be able to have. Which is an interesting observation. Do women have a hard time communicating because so many are busy being concerned with the juvenile bullshit expectations of what is 'sexually attractive'?

I just tell them "that stuff is sooo 20 years ago for me; I tell them about books like "The Story of O" or "9 1/2 weeks" both vile stories of sexist masochism. One young woman, a feminist, says she reads erotica a lot and 50 shades is not what she considers erotic, merely stupid and immature.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Twilight is not feminist: it's female masochism (Original Post) ismnotwasm Nov 2012 OP
Agreed - also - OhZone Nov 2012 #1
Heh ismnotwasm Nov 2012 #2
Isn't the Twilight author a Mormon? Could have something to do with it. catbyte Nov 2012 #3
She is, and a devout one evidently ismnotwasm Nov 2012 #4

ismnotwasm

(41,995 posts)
4. She is, and a devout one evidently
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 03:27 PM
Nov 2012

But I don't see how Twilight differs from certain works of Urban Fantasy flooding the market the these days. Helpless female crap, with a subtle anti-abortion message. But perhaps her upbringing and faith DID inspire how she presents women. I haven't read the series.


Me, I'm a sci-fi fan, I don't mind the occasional fluff-fantasy reading with a kick-ass female protagonist with a sword battling evil magic or something, along with equal opportunity sexual tension, say along the order of Illona Andrews books, but I hate the ones that are no different than sexist and oversexed bodice rippers. I don't care how many vampires you put in them.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Twilight is not feminist:...