History of Feminism
Related: About this forumRise of the Female Gun Nut
So I'm not posting this for a debate about guns, but for a few telling paragraphs that made my eyes roll.
What the Fuck? I understand these women are probably hobbiests, but 'Hello Kitty'?? What's worse? This
Spend a few minutes scrolling through the websites of gun dealers and you might be forgiven for thinking America is a nation of Gayle Trotters: women using the language of feminism to demand the right to choose to defend ourselves, as the gun-rights activist put it in her Senate testimony last week. Three of the top six U.S. gun-makers Smith & Wesson, Remington, and Sig Sauer have pages or products dedicated to the prospective female gun owner, offering smaller lightweight models, shorter trigger pulls, and grips designed for smaller hands. There are rifle cartridges designed to reduce recoil, holsters designed to fit between a womans décolletage, and high-end concealed-carry purses. Theres a lot of pink: pink camouflage gun cases and pink Pumpmaster Air Rifles and pink tipped bullets and pink assault rifles.
Jesus Christ on a trailer hitch. Lets sex up our guns shall we? And there's no escape;
Today theres a new wave of Paxton Quigleys connecting and finding audiences online, including forums like the Girls Guide to Guns, a publication from L.A.-based gun enthusiast Natalie Foster that features advice on purchasing handguns, a reaction to this summer's Aurora shooting, and instructions for DIY shotgun shell ornaments; and Packing Pretty, a blog from 25-year-old Gracie McKee, an NRA instructor who wears pink polo shirts and once posted a video demonstrating how to carry a concealed weapon under a little black dress. There are concealed-carry fashion shows and meet-ups like at the first annual A Girl and a Gun National Conference, to be held next month in Waco, Texas, and with sponsorship from Smith & Wesson. No word yet on whether man cards will be passed out or revoked.
http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/02/rise-of-the-female-gun-nut.html
Conceal and carry fashion shows. Nice.
I've owned guns in the past, and I've never felt the desire to make them 'just for us girls'. They were to kill or hurt people, why would I ? Home defense or not. I've never been a 'hobbiests'. My daughter, upon returning from Afghanistan wanted a pink crossbow, but she says it was more reactionary to the dryness and colorlessness she experienced during her deployment. Now she says they're too damned expensive. That's right. To have your weapons all pinkified, you hafta pay more.
Animal Chin
(175 posts)the technology of which has not changed greatly in 100 years. Because they need to withstand the explosion of powder in propelling the bullet, guns are made very sturdily. The effect of this is that, unlike your flat screen TV, apple computer and GPS unit, a minimally maintained firearm will probably remain functional and in good working order for the rest of your life.
This is a problem for gun manufacturers (read: the NRA) because in order to increase sales, they need to sell more guns, but everyone who has a gun already probably doesn't need one. Therefore, the industry needs to appeal to new customers. You've covered females here well. Also, go the NRA site and see how much they talk about getting kids involved in firearms and the kids programs they have.
Also explains why they're against universal background checks when 9 out of 10 individuals are in favor: all those crazy people are potential customers.
The NRA is not really a proponent of the right to keep and bear arms (that's the window dressing that's easy to sell to the not-so-smart-people who support it) as much as it is a proponent of the right to manufacture and sell arms.
hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)After coming off MIRT, where I had little time to post here or elsewhere, it seems that statistically (with 13 posts) RKBA has become my "favorite" group in my profile. UGGGGH! I am fairly certain any posts I made were on the "latest" page and likely believing they were GD threads-- or they may have been made in an attempt to clarify a poster's intent as part of MIRT duties.
But, ugggh.
ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)I could see where that would be distressing however
hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)But, wow, that was a shock, even if momentarily.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)somewhere else. I understand why you're creeped out. I would be too.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)the 3 yr old picked up and killed himself with. Great.
Why make them look 'attractive'-- not that pink guns are, but how ridiculous can you get. If not for target practice they're for killing. And they are not 'sexy' I could puke.
And sticking a pink gun or any friggin color gun in your 'décolleté'? Dumbass.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)though i guess we could go with that. of late we have certainly seen a gun does not have to be pink for a kid to play with.
hubby has guns. they are locked in a safe.
i dont like guns and had two little kids running around.
told hubby.... anything happens, will be his guilt and burden to carry. he keeps them locked.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)If I saw a pink gun, I would assume it was a toy. Why would a three year be more discerning? Reports are the child thought the gun was a toy. Yes, the fundamental issue is someone left a gun lying around, and that person should be imprisoned. But manufacturers creating pink guns should be held liable, but congress protects them from law suit. Detergent makes have been sued for packaging that looks overly enticing to children, as have beer makers, but gun manufacturers are exempt because of the power of the gun lobby.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)concept of gun, real/dangerous, be it pink or any other color. they do not get it at 3.
and no gun should be accessible to a 3 yr old, end of story.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...my feelings about whether or not anyone should have a gun, I feel that having one that looks like a toy burdens the owner with an extra responsibility to be even more careful with it should any children ever be near enough to have access.
If it's a bright color or has a picture of:
...or any other cartoon character on it, a kid will likely think it's a toy.
Don't do it. Guns should look like guns.
Don't put turpentine in Gatorade bottles.
Don't put the alka seltzer in the bottle with the antacids.
Safety should be simple.
ismnotwasm
(41,980 posts)I can just see the number of ways THAT could go wrong. Or in your pocket, down your pants etc
Guns should look like what they are.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)isnt so good either. i have read books and seen movies forever people sticking guns in pants and i have always flashed on that.
but then, i am afraid... of guns.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...with the idea of a pistol concealed in the "decolletage". Mostly I have trouble with idea carrying a gun there. However, I must also confess the actual mechanics of doing so puzzle me a bit. Would this be done with what I have to believe is an unrealistically small gun or can this only be accomplished if the "decolletage" in question is closer in size to a delicatessen?
As far as the idea of carrying a gun stuck in you belt goes, I would hope the wisdom of doing so would have been apparent to everyone after the unfortunate consequences befalling Plaxico Buress:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaxico_Burress#Accidental_shooting