Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 11:05 PM Mar 2013

Here are some shocking statistics about the prevalence of domestic violence:

•According to the U.S. Department of Justice, 1 in 4 U.S. women will experience intimate partner violence.

•Approximately 4.8 million intimate partner rapes and physical assaults are perpetrated against U.S. women annually (Findings from the 2000 National Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

•According to the U.S. Surgeon General, domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to American women.

•On average more than three women a day are murdered by their current or former intimate partners.

•Young women ages 16-24 have a higher incidence of partner violence than any other age group, almost triple that of the national average.


"The domestic violence movement was born out of Second Wave feminism in the 1970s," she says." so from the beginning, we've defined domestic violence as a women's issue, and I think that's left us with a gap, or blind spot, in our conceptualization of the problem. The information we have to date is very victim-centered: we know a lot about victim needs, how best to protect them, what the warning signs of abuse are."

"But that's leaving out the other major actor in these relationships -- the batterer. We don't know nearly enough about them, about their motives and needs. How can we hope to change batterer behavior if we don't fully understand it?"

"If you look at battery statistics across all groups -- gay, straight, men, women -- it's uniformly the case that men are much more likely to be the aggressors... So even when the sex of the victim changes, the sex of the likely perpetrator is still male. But although it's very apparent that men play a defining role here, we haven't managed to gather much useful information on them. I think that has to change if we ever want to get these incidence rates down."


Links to the stats are located at link:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christine-bronstein/keep-calm-and-rape-a-lot-_b_2822508.html

Pretty interesting article. Lot of factoids and interesting points of view. Also, very disappointing, sad, and angering.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here are some shocking statistics about the prevalence of domestic violence: (Original Post) boston bean Mar 2013 OP
and yet, 138 woman-haters voted against re-authorizing VAWA, and the US STILL has not niyad Mar 2013 #1
lovely, aren't they niyad! sheshe2 Mar 2013 #4
I know bachmann voted no, will have to look at the list again to see the others. niyad Mar 2013 #7
Vicki Hartlzer from my MO district did as well. Hayabusa Mar 2013 #8
How do these domestic violence/battery statistics correlate with income or poverty level? Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #2
This, go to the link on the first post. sheshe2 Mar 2013 #3
How does that relate to domestic violence and income levels? Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #5
I thought it was common knowledge that the risk is higher in low income households, redqueen Mar 2013 #6
Sure, it's "common" knowledge...but "common" knowledge isn't always true or accurate. Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #9
Of course there are statistics. redqueen Mar 2013 #10
No, it definitely is NOT a 'classist' statement. Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #11
Oh yes, it is. Singling out low income men as needing lessons on 'proper behavior'? redqueen Mar 2013 #12
Tell me, do you think Head Start is 'classist'? Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #13
The factor in low income households BainsBane Mar 2013 #14
I'm thinking more about the men--you know, the ones who actually CAUSE the violence. Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #15
I don't think education helps BainsBane Mar 2013 #16
Too bad there's not an early warning system... Common Sense Party Mar 2013 #17
I've spent my life since BainsBane Mar 2013 #18

niyad

(113,581 posts)
1. and yet, 138 woman-haters voted against re-authorizing VAWA, and the US STILL has not
Thu Mar 7, 2013, 11:57 PM
Mar 2013

ratified CEDAW. some civilized country we have here.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
2. How do these domestic violence/battery statistics correlate with income or poverty level?
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 12:13 AM
Mar 2013

I'm curious if the rates of violence are much higher in households below the poverty line, or if it is fairly uniform across all socioeconomic levels.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
6. I thought it was common knowledge that the risk is higher in low income households,
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 08:08 AM
Mar 2013

but reporting is less likely in high income households, so the actual difference isn't clear. After all... Chris Brown, Charlie Sheen, etc.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
9. Sure, it's "common" knowledge...but "common" knowledge isn't always true or accurate.
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 05:01 PM
Mar 2013

I was wondering if there are any stats.

The more we can address issues of poverty, and at the same time focus energies on teaching proper behavior in low income households, the better off society will be.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
10. Of course there are statistics.
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 05:12 PM
Mar 2013
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=statistics+income+domestic+violence

The fact that domestic violence occurs in all classes means ending poverty will not address the root cause.

Also, 'teaching proper behavior in low income households' is a classist statement.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
11. No, it definitely is NOT a 'classist' statement.
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 05:40 PM
Mar 2013

It is a reflection of reality and it is the best way to help women. If it's women in low income households that are MOST in danger of being victims of domestic violence, then why in God's name would you NOT want to focus on the men in those households and teach them not to hit, not to abuse, not to rape?

Good grief.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
12. Oh yes, it is. Singling out low income men as needing lessons on 'proper behavior'?
Fri Mar 8, 2013, 05:58 PM
Mar 2013

Did we not just discuss the fact that it affects all classes? Just because statistically, low income couples seem to be affected at higher rates does not mean you excuse high income men from these 'proper behavior' lessons.

The lessons which would prevent this need to be learned by men of all income levels.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022478438

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
14. The factor in low income households
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 03:58 AM
Mar 2013

would be the stress caused by poverty, rather than some sort of cultural value about women linked to class.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
15. I'm thinking more about the men--you know, the ones who actually CAUSE the violence.
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 02:47 PM
Mar 2013

They are the ones who need education about how NOT to resort to violence.

It may be stress from poverty, it may be cultural, it may be any number of things. All I know is IT AIN'T RIGHT to abuse women or children, and I would think that a program aimed at the very people who are victimizing innocents might actually do some good.

I thought that was the idea--to actually HELP people.

Some people around here would rather play political correctness games than actually help people, I guess.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
16. I don't think education helps
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 05:25 PM
Mar 2013

It's not like they don't know it's not okay to terrorize women. They do it anyway. I was married to an abusive husband, and we went through all kinds of counseling and therapy groups to probe into the angst about what caused him to explode. I sat through endless therapy sessions where a therapist tried to get him to talk. It was all a complete waste of time. All it did was postpone my leaving by offering me false hope.
My advice for anyone woman whose partner raises a hand to her or throws all the dishes around the house in a fit of rage: leave immediately and don't go back. It only gets worse.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
17. Too bad there's not an early warning system...
Sat Mar 9, 2013, 07:13 PM
Mar 2013

Some way of spotting the red flags BEFORE the jerk goes all haywire.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Here are some shocking st...