History of Feminism
Related: About this forumHere are some shocking statistics about the prevalence of domestic violence:
Approximately 4.8 million intimate partner rapes and physical assaults are perpetrated against U.S. women annually (Findings from the 2000 National Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice & Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)
According to the U.S. Surgeon General, domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to American women.
On average more than three women a day are murdered by their current or former intimate partners.
Young women ages 16-24 have a higher incidence of partner violence than any other age group, almost triple that of the national average.
"But that's leaving out the other major actor in these relationships -- the batterer. We don't know nearly enough about them, about their motives and needs. How can we hope to change batterer behavior if we don't fully understand it?"
"If you look at battery statistics across all groups -- gay, straight, men, women -- it's uniformly the case that men are much more likely to be the aggressors... So even when the sex of the victim changes, the sex of the likely perpetrator is still male. But although it's very apparent that men play a defining role here, we haven't managed to gather much useful information on them. I think that has to change if we ever want to get these incidence rates down."
Links to the stats are located at link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christine-bronstein/keep-calm-and-rape-a-lot-_b_2822508.html
Pretty interesting article. Lot of factoids and interesting points of view. Also, very disappointing, sad, and angering.
niyad
(113,581 posts)ratified CEDAW. some civilized country we have here.
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)People with out souls.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/07/violence-against-women-act_n_2832014.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
the links are at the post...unfortunately they do not list the women that voted nay.
niyad
(113,581 posts)Hayabusa
(2,135 posts)Jerk...
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I'm curious if the rates of violence are much higher in households below the poverty line, or if it is fairly uniform across all socioeconomic levels.
sheshe2
(83,925 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I don't see the connection.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)but reporting is less likely in high income households, so the actual difference isn't clear. After all... Chris Brown, Charlie Sheen, etc.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I was wondering if there are any stats.
The more we can address issues of poverty, and at the same time focus energies on teaching proper behavior in low income households, the better off society will be.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)The fact that domestic violence occurs in all classes means ending poverty will not address the root cause.
Also, 'teaching proper behavior in low income households' is a classist statement.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)It is a reflection of reality and it is the best way to help women. If it's women in low income households that are MOST in danger of being victims of domestic violence, then why in God's name would you NOT want to focus on the men in those households and teach them not to hit, not to abuse, not to rape?
Good grief.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Did we not just discuss the fact that it affects all classes? Just because statistically, low income couples seem to be affected at higher rates does not mean you excuse high income men from these 'proper behavior' lessons.
The lessons which would prevent this need to be learned by men of all income levels.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022478438
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)would be the stress caused by poverty, rather than some sort of cultural value about women linked to class.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)They are the ones who need education about how NOT to resort to violence.
It may be stress from poverty, it may be cultural, it may be any number of things. All I know is IT AIN'T RIGHT to abuse women or children, and I would think that a program aimed at the very people who are victimizing innocents might actually do some good.
I thought that was the idea--to actually HELP people.
Some people around here would rather play political correctness games than actually help people, I guess.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)It's not like they don't know it's not okay to terrorize women. They do it anyway. I was married to an abusive husband, and we went through all kinds of counseling and therapy groups to probe into the angst about what caused him to explode. I sat through endless therapy sessions where a therapist tried to get him to talk. It was all a complete waste of time. All it did was postpone my leaving by offering me false hope.
My advice for anyone woman whose partner raises a hand to her or throws all the dishes around the house in a fit of rage: leave immediately and don't go back. It only gets worse.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Some way of spotting the red flags BEFORE the jerk goes all haywire.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)being hypervigilant. Such things can cause one to be too cautious.