Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:19 PM Sep 2013

No, Analyzing The Gender Politics Of ‘Grand Theft Auto V’–Or Anything Else–Isn’t ‘Unprofessional’

"It’s always fascinating to me when consumers react to criticism as if its sole purpose is to provide some sort of affirmation that a work is good in exactly the way a given consumer believes it to be, and not to spark any further discussion. Suggesting that a piece of work isn’t worthy of further discussion has always seemed to me to be a way of saying that it’s not actually very rich or very interesting. And insisting that a creator’s work can’t possibly be improved on in any way often seems like a way of saying you don’t expect much from a creator you claim to respect–there are obvious pinnacles in artists’ careers, but not everything you like has to be an unparalleled work of genius in order for you to like it. I understand not wanting to face up to your complicated feelings about difficult art–you’re talking to a woman who spent a bunch of time in the fetal position after last week’s Breaking Bad before peeling herself upright to go write about it. But complaining that other people are unprofessional for making you feel uncomfortable is the exact opposite of the moral sophistication that you’re supposed to demonstrate by occupying an anti-hero’s head for an hour or two..."


http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2013/09/18/2641521/grand-theft-auto/




My own gaming preferences have strayed from the console and computer model back to the tabletop in the past five years or so, so my knowledge of the trendy and pop games isn't what it should be (you could tell me the latest iterations is IX or X and I'd be none the wiser), but it is nonetheless, quite revealing to me the amount of push-back she received for her review.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, Analyzing The Gender Politics Of ‘Grand Theft Auto V’–Or Anything Else–Isn’t ‘Unprofessional’ (Original Post) LanternWaste Sep 2013 OP
I agree DonCoquixote Sep 2013 #1
Women should get to be women ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #4
Indeed DonCoquixote Sep 2013 #5
This is an excellent analysis ismnotwasm Sep 2013 #2
NY Times article on GTA V which briefly mentions the role of women in the game... PoliticAverse Sep 2013 #3
prostitutes. strippers. nope, dont watch the movie nor play the game. i have made boys way aware seabeyond Sep 2013 #6
LOL, what a pathetic attempt to silence feminist critics. redqueen Sep 2013 #7
always to shut up. even here on du the tactic is used. talk porn, and you hear the cries of free seabeyond Sep 2013 #8
Many liberals completely lose the fucking plot where the sex industry is concerned. redqueen Sep 2013 #9

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
1. I agree
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:32 PM
Sep 2013

Grand Theft Auto may be a well made game, but it's themes are crap, they do not even tease at having something to say, unlike a Tarantino flick. GTA Vice City had a lot of satire, yes, but that was then.

On the other hand, I do not agree with the knee jerk "any game that has guns or shows women in any light other than" is good either. For example, Bioshock Infinite has women as heroines and Villains, and makes one of them the ultimate moral compass of the game. I hear people say 'where are the strong women" and I said "are you kidding?"

ismnotwasm

(41,999 posts)
4. Women should get to be women
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:06 PM
Sep 2013

I agree, not superficial characters to demean and degrade or "save"

And women can be both strong and weak, good and bad.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
5. Indeed
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 05:19 PM
Sep 2013

and the game I mentioned does a good job of that, wil women being heroines and villains at various points in the game. I do agree about the whole "art being separate from politics" is BS. To quote Diego Rivera "all art is propaganda."

ismnotwasm

(41,999 posts)
2. This is an excellent analysis
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:40 PM
Sep 2013
The idea that politics and art occupy spheres that are hermetically sealed off from each other is so naive that I feel like I shouldn’t have to address it here, but I will, anyway. The reason violence against women shows up in the Grand Theft Auto franchise repeatedly is political: shooting, beating, or injuring women is a transgressive act, and part of the point of the games is to examine how easily players step into behavior that they understand to deviate from societal norms. If, as a society, we agreed that violence against women was morally neutral, or even acceptable if the bitch seemed to be asking for it, then violence against women wouldn’t be a repeated motif in the franchise, much in the same way that Grand Theft Auto itself wouldn’t be transgressive or interesting at all if we lived in an anarchic, Randian dystopia where economic transactions were conducted purely by force. If the point of a piece of art is to stretch and break norms, then discussing those norms, why they exist, and what we feel when we step over them is an entirely logical place for conversation about that art to go.



PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. NY Times article on GTA V which briefly mentions the role of women in the game...
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 04:03 PM
Sep 2013
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/arts/video-games/grand-theft-auto-v-is-a-return-to-the-comedy-of-violence.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

For all that the game does right, it has a genuinely problematic aspect that is not its enthusiasm for violence or sex but its lack of interest in women as something other than lustful airheads (notwithstanding a late-game cameo by Mr. Houser’s mother, Geraldine Moffat, a British actress of the 1960s and ’70s). One of the only young women in the game not oversexed and under-read is sucked into a jet turbine.

When I asked Mr. Houser if he had thought about the portrayal of women in Rockstar’s games, he said, “Seemingly not as much as I should have.” He added: “These three guys fit with the story we wanted to tell. It would be hard to take one of them and replace him — I mean, I suppose we could have done it, early enough on — with a female character.”

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. prostitutes. strippers. nope, dont watch the movie nor play the game. i have made boys way aware
Wed Sep 18, 2013, 05:37 PM
Sep 2013

how the male entertainment has gotta have prostitutes and strippers to entertainment the men and boys. they know that will be a no

i am lucky. neither of my boys are much in the shootin' up games and have never been fans of gta. hubby played the first and wasnt impressed. not in our house.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
8. always to shut up. even here on du the tactic is used. talk porn, and you hear the cries of free
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 08:34 AM
Sep 2013

speech. but, that free speech only goes one way.

only if cheering porn can one speak, otherwise the person has someone stopped free speech to opposing porn

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
9. Many liberals completely lose the fucking plot where the sex industry is concerned.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 10:25 AM
Sep 2013

Capitalism must be scrutinized and questioned and even decried as cruel and inherently unfair - UNLESS what's being sold is women's bodies, physical or objectified in media - then it's hot and sexxxy and so"sex positive" and "third wave" (or seventh lol)

Corporate tyrants are horrible greedy parasites - UNLESS it's misogynist pimps like Hefner, Guccione, or Flynt - then they're heroes and awesome dudes!

Racism is unquestionably evil (well, at least the most obvious kinds) - UNLESS you're talking about fetishizing women of color's bodies as othered, exotified sex objects - then it's fine so shut up!

Poverty is a scourge of mankind that we should all strive to end and attack as a force which drives the desperate to participate in harmful social ills - UNLESS it's the poverty which drives women who have only their bodies to sell - then it's her choice and we should never question it or examine it cause that's infantilizing her and denying her agency!

Violence by the powerful against the powerless is indefensible, full stop! UNLESS it is fetishized and called sex - then it's kinky and sexxxy and so not up for critical analysis despite its existing in a culture which romanticizes power imbalances, rape, and sexual violence.

Slavery and torture are horrible travesties and should be abolished! UNLESS its sexual slavery and recreational torture. Those things are just exaggerated and overhyped and really aren't worth bothering our beautiful minds with - and CERTAINLY not worth hurting the fee fees of any delicate, easily offended kinksters. (To the super easily offended: "kinksters" is NOT a derogatory term. Just in case anyone's looking for an excuse.)

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»No, Analyzing The Gender ...