Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumHow Breast Cancer Won the Battle for October
Rita Smith was watching football in 2009 when she noticed as if it were possible not to that the players were newly outfitted in pink socks and gloves. Her heart sank. I was pretty sure we were toast, she says. There was no way we were ever gonna match them.
Smith is executive director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, which also claims October as its awareness-raising month. The signature color is purple, not that youll find it on Yoplait lids or KFC buckets or Energizer batteries or, for that matter, NFL players, because October is already covered in pink. Breast cancer is, as many critics have pointed out, the perfect issue for corporate-funded cause marketing. Its got an unambiguous villain (CANCER) and a natural constituency (women). Saving boobies is a friendly cause that everyone even frat boys and NFL players can get behind. A straightforward health issue.
By comparison, domestic violence is downright controversial. It touches on complicated issues like power, rape culture, victim-blaming, and gender roles, and stirs up uncomfortable emotions. While few people would claim they support abusers, many known perpetrators of domestic violence from Roman Polanski to Chris Brown to a number of football players remain venerated cultural figures. Is it any wonder that, even though domestic violence affects many more women and families, breast cancer is the issue weve all come to associate with October? Every year 232,340 women are diagnosed with invasive breast cancer; 1.3 million are assaulted by their husbands or boyfriends. One in eight women will suffer from breast cancer in her lifetime. One in four will experience domestic violence. Good luck finding that statistic on a yogurt lid this month.
The anti-domestic-violence movement staked its claim to October way back in 1981. At that time breast cancer wasnt on anybodys radar screen the way it is now, so we got a lot of traction and visibility, and it worked for us for a really long time, Smith says. And then it didnt. The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation had been around since 1982, but its pink-ribbon campaign didnt really start taking off until the late nineties. And then it became a powerhouse. In fact, after seeing even the NFL turn pink four years ago, Smith made a plea to her fellow advocates to move to a different month, but couldnt get a strong consensus. Its stayed in October," she says, and we get the visibility we can get, knowing that were probably not going to be seen above the pink.
...
http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/10/how-breast-cancer-won-the-battle-for-october.html
Smith is executive director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, which also claims October as its awareness-raising month. The signature color is purple, not that youll find it on Yoplait lids or KFC buckets or Energizer batteries or, for that matter, NFL players, because October is already covered in pink. Breast cancer is, as many critics have pointed out, the perfect issue for corporate-funded cause marketing. Its got an unambiguous villain (CANCER) and a natural constituency (women). Saving boobies is a friendly cause that everyone even frat boys and NFL players can get behind. A straightforward health issue.
By comparison, domestic violence is downright controversial. It touches on complicated issues like power, rape culture, victim-blaming, and gender roles, and stirs up uncomfortable emotions. While few people would claim they support abusers, many known perpetrators of domestic violence from Roman Polanski to Chris Brown to a number of football players remain venerated cultural figures. Is it any wonder that, even though domestic violence affects many more women and families, breast cancer is the issue weve all come to associate with October? Every year 232,340 women are diagnosed with invasive breast cancer; 1.3 million are assaulted by their husbands or boyfriends. One in eight women will suffer from breast cancer in her lifetime. One in four will experience domestic violence. Good luck finding that statistic on a yogurt lid this month.
The anti-domestic-violence movement staked its claim to October way back in 1981. At that time breast cancer wasnt on anybodys radar screen the way it is now, so we got a lot of traction and visibility, and it worked for us for a really long time, Smith says. And then it didnt. The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation had been around since 1982, but its pink-ribbon campaign didnt really start taking off until the late nineties. And then it became a powerhouse. In fact, after seeing even the NFL turn pink four years ago, Smith made a plea to her fellow advocates to move to a different month, but couldnt get a strong consensus. Its stayed in October," she says, and we get the visibility we can get, knowing that were probably not going to be seen above the pink.
...
http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/10/how-breast-cancer-won-the-battle-for-october.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 711 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Breast Cancer Won the Battle for October (Original Post)
redqueen
Oct 2013
OP
blm
(113,083 posts)1. The artist/photographer Matuschka jumpstarted breast cancer awareness in 93 and
received an enormous backlash for her NYT cover photo that played a huge part in RW leaning corporations siding with Nancy Brinker's view and her cutesification effort that have had very little effect on any cures for the disease but have substantially increased the profits of those firms sporting 'pink' labels.
http://www.beautyoutofdamage.com/index.html
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)2. That is a fascinating analysis
Here we have all kinds of breast cancer awareness--and quiet little DV campaigns that usually get some kind of back lash.