History of Feminism

yuiyoshida

(41,832 posts) Fri Mar 14, 2014, 11:48 AM Mar 2014

Mini-skirt turbulence at Skymark Airlines

National Mar. 12, 2014 - 03:05PM JST ( 111 )
Mini-skirt turbulence at Skymark Airlines Shinichi Nishikubo (centre), president of Japan's Skymark Airlines, with flight attendants at Haneda Airport in Tokyo on March 7. AFP

TOKYO —

A Japanese budget airline has flown into rough air over its decision to outfit flight attendants in revealing mini-skirts, drawing criticism that it could invite sexual harassment.

Skymark Airlines came under fire from the cabin crew’s labor union, which said the super-short skirt—with a distinctively swinging ‘60s look—barely covers wearers’ thighs.

“We’re concerned that the design of this uniform may cause problems,” including sexual harassment, the Japan Federation of Cabin Attendants said in a statement.

“The airline is saying the uniform is meant to attract more customers, but this shows the company is treating women like a commodity,” it added.

more..http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/mini-skirt-turbulence-at-skymark-airlines

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mini-skirt turbulence at Skymark Airlines (Original Post) yuiyoshida Mar 2014 OP

Well, I'm not being told to wear them, BUT harassment is cause by people, not by the clothes worn NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #1

+1 F4lconF16 Mar 2014 #3

As someone who was born before the miniskirt was invented... malthaussen Mar 2014 #2

This comes around the same time that Massachusetts passed Flatulo Mar 2014 #4

It's a small Airline ismnotwasm Mar 2014 #5

Asian airlines are notoriously sexist. Singapore Air in particular comes to mind. Flatulo Mar 2014 #6

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)

1. Well, I'm not being told to wear them, BUT harassment is cause by people, not by the clothes worn

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Fri Mar 14, 2014, 11:53 AM

Mar 2014

And that's my opinion about that.

Being told to wear skirts that make employees feel uncomfortable would be a different conversation.

But I don't like the framing of the "concern" and the way it places "cause" on the uniform and the wearers, rather than on the perpetrators of harassment.

Hi, yuiyoshida!

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)

3. +1

Reply to NYC_SKP (Reply #1)

Fri Mar 14, 2014, 02:12 PM

Mar 2014

My thoughts exactly.

malthaussen

(17,204 posts)

2. As someone who was born before the miniskirt was invented...

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Fri Mar 14, 2014, 11:58 AM

Mar 2014

... I am bemused.

-- Mal

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)

4. This comes around the same time that Massachusetts passed

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Sun Mar 16, 2014, 09:31 AM

Mar 2014

a law banning the surreptitious taking of photos of women's panties, a practice known as 'upskirting'. There are numerous websites devoted to this particular practice.

What struck me was that we've sank so low as a species that we need laws to remind men not to stare at or photograph women's private parts. Sad.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)

5. It's a small Airline

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Sun Mar 16, 2014, 11:14 AM

Mar 2014

One hopes those flight attendants don't have to bend over, and I'll bet you a million dollars they either have no male flight attendants, or there is no mini-skirt equivalent.

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)

6. Asian airlines are notoriously sexist. Singapore Air in particular comes to mind.

Reply to yuiyoshida (Original post)

Sun Mar 16, 2014, 12:37 PM

Mar 2014

Unless you're considered gorgeous, you'll never work as a flight attendant for them.

Reply to this discussion