Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:11 AM Jan 2015

Teens Struggling With Mental Health Issues Often Have Easy Access To Guns


http://thinkprogress.org/health/2015/01/05/3607803/teens-mental-health-guns/

"U.S. teenagers with a history of mental health problems and suicidal tendencies are often able to easily access firearms in their homes, which could increase their risk of killing themselves, according to the results from a new study published in JAMA Psychiatry.
Although suicide doesn’t always dominate the national conversation about gun violence prevention, it’s actually the leading cause of gun deaths in the United States. A large body of scientific evidence suggests that the presence of guns in the home directly increases the risk of suicide, partly because people who are attempting to kill themselves are more likely to succeed when they opt for a gun.
Particularly in the mental health community, there’s been a renewed emphasis on safe gun storage to prevent kids struggling with depression from accidentally getting their hands on their parents’ firearms. Researchers at the University of Washington assumed that would mean that kids with suicidal tendencies would be more likely to live in homes where guns are out of reach."

................

Easy access to guns makes suicide so much easier and final, scientific studies prove it, another reason to get some control over these deadly weapons.

The Australian, U.K. And Canadian approaches to placing the burden of proof on a would be gun owner as to the justification for owning a firearm is the only sensible approach.

Time for another gun control vote in Congress on all the gun restrictions denied after Sandy Hook, the folks are down for it a bit more than GOP votes on repealing Obamacare and a pipeline.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Teens Struggling With Mental Health Issues Often Have Easy Access To Guns (Original Post) Fred Sanders Jan 2015 OP
Cue the right wing billh58 Jan 2015 #1
You really think with the republicans in control of the Congress GGJohn Jan 2015 #2
History is your friend, my friend, the NRA influence prevented an override of the GOP filibuster. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #3
The filibuster made no difference with the AWB and mag limit, GGJohn Jan 2015 #4
Forget about the Senate. branford Jan 2015 #5
How about that report from the scientists? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #7
Is it your contention that "reports from scientists" branford Jan 2015 #9
So who made you king and gave you permission to set parameters for legislation flamin lib Jan 2015 #11
How's your strategy working out in Congress? branford Jan 2015 #12
One of the things we need to push for is safe storage. flamin lib Jan 2015 #6
Safe storage laws are a good idea, GGJohn Jan 2015 #8
Same as proof of insurance for autos. nt flamin lib Jan 2015 #10
Ok, but how would you ensure compliance without running into 4A problems? GGJohn Jan 2015 #13
Look up thread and READ. nt flamin lib Jan 2015 #14
Ok, I like that, a tax deduction for buying a firearm safe. GGJohn Jan 2015 #15
Where did I say anything about a tax deduction? READ. flamin lib Jan 2015 #16
Sorry, I was reading post 11 and mis read it. GGJohn Jan 2015 #17
Please read the SOP for this group and try to comply. flamin lib Jan 2015 #18
Negativity? I'm asking pertinent questions, GGJohn Jan 2015 #19
Please read the SOP for this group and try to comply. nt flamin lib Jan 2015 #20
See post 21. GGJohn Jan 2015 #22
No, you just spew RW gunner garbage. tradewinds Jan 2015 #26
Well, if all you want is an echo chamber where you can all slap yourselves on the back GGJohn Jan 2015 #21
You mean the group that brags about running people away? The group that regurgitates NRA flamin lib Jan 2015 #23
And this group doesn't do the same? GGJohn Jan 2015 #24
Don't go away mad, just go the fuck away! nt flamin lib Jan 2015 #25
Odd how gun nuts keep missing this statement billh58 Jan 2015 #28
Dont let the door hit you on the way out! ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #29
All you are is a crazed gunner talking head. tradewinds Jan 2015 #27

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
2. You really think with the republicans in control of the Congress
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 12:25 PM
Jan 2015

there will be a vote on gun control?
Hell, Sen. Feinstein's AWB couldn't even garner a majority vote in the Senate, nor could her mag limit bill, and that's when we had a majority in the Senate.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
3. History is your friend, my friend, the NRA influence prevented an override of the GOP filibuster.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 12:27 PM
Jan 2015

The NRA and the GOP are your friends?

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
4. The filibuster made no difference with the AWB and mag limit,
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 12:30 PM
Jan 2015

the AWB only got 40 votes while the mag limit only got 46 votes, and now with the repubs in control, how are you going to get a vote in either chamber of Congress?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
5. Forget about the Senate.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 02:01 PM
Jan 2015

How exactly were any of the gun control proposals going to pass the Republican House?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
9. Is it your contention that "reports from scientists"
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 02:19 PM
Jan 2015

will magically convince the majority Republic House and Senate to pass gun control measures or repeal the Second Amendment and its numerous state analogs?

If you believe that safe storage laws will reduce teen suicide, a proposition I find questionable, your best bet is to focus your political efforts state by state, where most gun control legislation is based, not Congress. So long as the suggested safe storage laws permit ready access to firearms for self defense (e.g., no rendering guns inoperable or without ammunition, etc.), you might very well find many gun rights proponents ready to compromise. Taking a carrot, rather than stick, approach, such as tax deductions for gun safes, might also be a viable strategy. However, if your demand is that the USA should be more like Britain or Australia concerning guns, which amounts to radical shifts in American culture and law and little more than gun bans, why would any gun rights supporter even begin dialogue with you?

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
11. So who made you king and gave you permission to set parameters for legislation
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 02:55 PM
Jan 2015

that might work to reduce gun violence? Tax deductions? Gimme something to do the right thing and obey a law? This sounds like every discussion I've had about storage in the gungeon.

Do you get a tax deduction on auto insurance because its required by law?

Frankly I don't really care what you find questionable. More than 200,000 guns are stolen every year and go into the black market. That alone should be reason for safe storage. Will even the cheapest gun safe defeat a determined suicide? It will deter some. Just don't leave the keys/combination lying around.

Self defense? Your paranoia doesn't concern me.

Contribute to the discussion of ways to reduce gun violence instead of nay saying about what won't work.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
12. How's your strategy working out in Congress?
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:52 PM
Jan 2015

Of course, you are certainly free to disagree with my positions or suggestions. However, how do you plan on getting your ideas through a Republican Congress, and with respect to some of your ideas, pass judicial scrutiny.

I'm a liberal Democrat, I don't own any firearms, no less a member of organizations like the NRA, a practicing trial attorney familiar with the legal issues concerning gun control, and more than willing to consider certain good-faith and limited gun control measure like universal background checks and safe storage measure. However, if you dismiss or harangue people like me, it only becomes much more difficult to pass any legislation.







flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
6. One of the things we need to push for is safe storage.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 02:05 PM
Jan 2015

A pistol safe can be had for $35. A safe for 8 long guns for less than $100. They won't comply with fed standards for class III weapons but they'll keep even the most determined teen and most all determined thrives out.

Enforcement will be an issue but a hefty fine and/or being charged with a felony for misuse of the gun might make a dent in mishandled firearms.

Besides, I have faith in most people. Americans largely obey the law even if its inconvenient. They just need to be made aware of what laws apply.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
8. Safe storage laws are a good idea,
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 02:15 PM
Jan 2015

but I don't see how you would get around the 4A, maybe you have some ideas that don't infringe on that.

Be back later, gotta go do the farm chores.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
13. Ok, but how would you ensure compliance without running into 4A problems?
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:23 PM
Jan 2015

I really curious to hear your proposals and see if they're workable.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
15. Ok, I like that, a tax deduction for buying a firearm safe.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:41 PM
Jan 2015

The problem I see here are the true gun idiots who would abuse the system by buying a cheap safe just to get the deduction, but I do agree that most reasonable people will follow the law, especially if there's a financial incentive.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
16. Where did I say anything about a tax deduction? READ.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:54 PM
Jan 2015

Also read SOP for the group and try to comply.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
17. Sorry, I was reading post 11 and mis read it.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:59 PM
Jan 2015

Ok, hefty fines for not securing your firearm, and misuse, but how, besides hefty fines and the threat of a felony, which probably would be struck down by the courts, do you ensure compliance without violating the 4A?

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
18. Please read the SOP for this group and try to comply.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:08 PM
Jan 2015

How are insurance laws enforced? Anybody come to your house and rummaged through your papers to find a policy? Does everybody obey insurance laws? No, but a lot more do than don't. Either take your negativity to the Gungeon or comply with the SOP.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
19. Negativity? I'm asking pertinent questions,
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:16 PM
Jan 2015

the same questions that would probably be asked by those attempting to craft such laws.

 

tradewinds

(260 posts)
26. No, you just spew RW gunner garbage.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:37 PM
Jan 2015

I've told you before, go play with your guns. Play hard. Play with your friends. Please.

It seems you live for guns. what a sad sorry useless life that must be.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
21. Well, if all you want is an echo chamber where you can all slap yourselves on the back
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:24 PM
Jan 2015

and proclaim the same thing over and over, then I'll just gracefully bow out and leave you all to yourselves.
Meanwhile, I'll continue to post in the other group where we have real and robust debates.
Have a great day and I hope we can debate on other topics.

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)
23. You mean the group that brags about running people away? The group that regurgitates NRA
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:26 PM
Jan 2015

propaganda? The group that has 100% agreement on all guns are good?

Yeah, that group.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
24. And this group doesn't do the same?
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:31 PM
Jan 2015

You all regurgitate all the gun control talking points, brag about blocking members who dare to post a different opinion, this group that's 100% agreement that all gun control laws are good.
Yeah, this group.
At least in the other, more honest group, you're allowed to go there and express a different opinion, unlike here.


Bye bye.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
28. Odd how gun nuts keep missing this statement
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:17 PM
Jan 2015

at the very top of the GCRA Group page:

"This is a group, not a forum. Groups often serve as safe havens for members who share similar interests and viewpoints. Individuals who post messages contrary to a particular group's stated purpose can be excluded from posting in that group."


isn't it...?

This Group was formed for the express purpose of not having to "debate" with right-wing gun nuts.
 

tradewinds

(260 posts)
27. All you are is a crazed gunner talking head.
Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:40 PM
Jan 2015

It seems to me you would not know "another topic" if it bit you on the ass. The whole world revolves around guns and your love of them.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»Teens Struggling With Men...