Last edited Tue Feb 17, 2015, 05:00 PM - Edit history (1)

Liberal Quakerism 100 percent
Your beliefs match closest with Liberal Quakerism!To find out more about what Liberal Quakers believe and how they practice their faith, visit our helpful guide to Liberal Quakerism.And afterwards, take our Politic-O-Matic quiz to see how your faith and beliefs influence your political views!

Unitarian Universalism(86%)
Liberal Christian Protestantism(72%)
Conservative Christian Protestant(66%)
Reformed Judaism(64%)
Orthodox Quakerism(63%)
Roman Catholicism(58%)
Neo-Paganism(58%)
Hinduism(56%)
Sikhism(54%)
Taoism(54%)
Secular Humanism(53%)
Seventh-day Adventists(52%)
Mahayana Buddhism(51%)
Theravada Buddhism(51%)
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints(49%)
Eastern Orthodox Christianity(48%)
New Thought(44%)
New Age(40%)
Jainism(38%)
Orthodox Judaism(37%)
Jehovah's Witnesses(37%)
Scientology(36%)
Church of Christ, Scientist(32%)
Bahá'í Faith(31%)
Atheism(31%)
Islam(19%)

Liberal Quakerism
100 percent


Your beliefs match closest with Liberal Quakerism!

To find out more about what Liberal Quakers believe and how they practice their faith, visit our helpful guide to Liberal Quakerism.

And afterwards, take our Politic-O-Matic quiz to see how your faith and beliefs influence your political views!


religious icon
68%

Seventh-day Adventists
religious icon
34%

Bahá'í Faith

religious icon
79%

Roman Catholicism
religious icon
40%

Church of Christ, Scientist

religious icon
64%

Conservative Christian Protestant
religious icon
77%

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

religious icon
53%

Hinduism
religious icon
26%

Islam

religious icon
42%

Jainism
religious icon
84%

Liberal Christian Protestantism

religious icon
39%

Mahayana Buddhism
religious icon
49%

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

religious icon
50%

Neo-Paganism
religious icon
41%

New Age

religious icon
41%

New Thought
religious icon
18%

Atheism

religious icon
20%

Orthodox Judaism
religious icon
97%

Orthodox Quakerism

religious icon
50%

Reformed Judaism
religious icon
41%

Scientology

religious icon
42%

Secular Humanism
religious icon
38%

Sikhism

religious icon
45%

Taoism
religious icon
40%

Theravada Buddhism

religious icon
78%

Unitarian Universalism
religious icon
42%

Jehovah's Witnesses

I always did like the Quakers.

But, I am circumcised!

Here is the link for the quiz page:
http://www.beliefnet.com/Entertainment/Quizzes/BeliefOMatic.aspx

Be back shortly with my results.

because they weren't mine

I have difficulty finding the label I am most comfortable with, but I like this one pretty well.

My results are:

100% Secular Humanism

Unitary Universalism(88%)
Atheism(79%)
Liberal Quakerism(68%)
Theravada Buddhism(53%)
Liberal Christian Protestantism(50%)
Taoism(40%)
Orthodox Quakerism(38%)
Neo-Paganism(35%)
New Age(34%)
Reformed Judaism(34%)
Mahayana Buddhism(29%)
Scientology(25%)
Jainism(25%)
New Thought(21%)
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints(21%)
Conservative Christian Protestant(20%)
Church of Christ, Scientist(18%)
Bahá'í Faith(18%)
Islam(18%)
Sikhism(16%)
Seventh-day Adventists(16%)
Orthodox Judaism(7%)
Roman Catholicism(7%)
Eastern Orthodox Christianity(7%)
Jehovah's Witnesses(7%)
Hinduism(5%)

These results, as I said, don't surprise me. I am ignostic and very secular humanistic. I am not anti-religion or anti-theistic and actually enjoy many aspects of community, ritual, and interfaith dialog. I have meditated within the Buddhist tradition for almost 35 years now always preferring the older, more 'atheistic' Theravadan traditions. I have always been more socially liberal, and I am a traditionalist and conservative when it comes to economics. So the percentages acknowledge that as well.

I must admit to being a bit surprised by the high number for Liberal Quakerism. Being the son/grandson of alcoholic, I do not drink, true. After my experiences in the military, I have become very anti-war. I am quite curious now to study the tradition a bit more.

Thanks, this was enlightening.

Liberal Quakerism & UU - 89%

since so many of us score high on that measure, a comment. I have a couple of centuries of Quaker ancestry and have always been drawn to that tradition. The Greensboro metro area has a higher concentration of Friends meetings than any other part of the US, I read somewhere, and it's not far away. But theologically and politically, the entire tradition has been moving rightwards for generations, embracing evangelical beliefs, hiring ministers, losing its distinctiveness. There is a small rural meeting I've attended once where some friends are members, and its very progressive. But they are now independent of all larger (yearly) meetings because the mainstream kept moving in a conservative direction. So I estimate that the conservative Friends outnumber the liberal ones 2-1.
Maybe PA is not like NC in this shift.

Re the test questions, I notice that a couple of you have high scores for secular humanism AND for atheism, whereas mine are quite different. Makes me wonder which questions feed into which categories; would speculate that pluralism and relativism are characteristics of secular humanists but not atheists.

and it seems to align with my ideas about things. I was a bit surprised at being a UU as the two times I've been to one locally, it was a Christian UU church, and still had rituals in it (I'm just not into that kind of thing any more.) My GF liked it though


My results:

I think UUism has an unfair advantage here at DU in that it has always been highly politically engaged in a progressive direction. So the questions about progressive social issues have something to do with why you and I ended up with 100% UU matches and everyone else in this thread scored fairly high-- even if their religious beliefs per se are more aligned with another faith tradition.

New Thought consists of three main groups and many unaffiliated authors; and has influenced Protestantism through mainstream and Pentecostal channels. Unity, Religious Science, and Divine Science are all much more individualistic, less focused on social justice, than UUism or Liberal Quakerism. (Similar to their parent tradition Christian Science in that regard.)

All that positive thinking gospel of healthy-mindedness is just fine on an individual basis, encouraging people to take responsibility for their own fates. But when people start to apply the same logic to others' suffering it can be downright cruel and heartless. Mitch Horowitz wrote an excellent study of New Thought a couple of years ago called One Simple Idea. He pinpoints the problematic issue of the "no accidents" doctrine. It might be healthy and constructive to take everything bad that happens to oneself as an individual as a "growth opportunity" or a result of past misunderstandings that can be corrected. But it is very unhealthy and destructive to take the same approach to large-scale social justice issues, blaming poverty on its victims instead of looking at how the deck is stacked against them.

PS-- UUism seems to be the opposite of Quakerism in that the liberal and non-theistic faction has triumphed decisively overall, and I've never encountered anything Christian-focused that bothered me in any of the services in VA and NC I've attended. But further north AND south, one might encounter a stronger Christian element for different reasons. In NY/NJ/PA the Universalist Church was strong, and it was more explicitly Christian than the Unitarians whose base was more in New England. There is still some legacy of this current in the northeast. Sunbelt cities like Houston would more likely to have Christian-leaning UU groups due to the cultural atmosphere. Lots of liberal Christians have felt driven out of mainstream churches in the South due to the rise of rightwing extremism therein. And the UUA has grown as the mainstream Protestant denominations have shrunk. Here is a map of UU growth showing where it is expanding and contracting.

is strong on Christianity and New Age spiritualism, but not conservatism. Here's their site, and their page for Sunday services (that gives a better description of what we went to.)

I think I was expecting a full lack of any religion, and something more "homogenized" from all religions. What I'd read around here about people visiting UU churches was it seemed more pagan than anything remotely like Christianity.

I don't dislike Christianity. I was raised Episcopalian. I just found the rituals meaningless. Thinking through personal beliefs, maybe with some conversational guidance, is about all I want from religion of any kind. That's why the Internet is so wonderful in that aspect

I was perplexed that anyone would find a UU church preaching Christianity as it is totally out of sync with my experience, but took you at your word. Figured maybe things are different in Texas-- as they are in so many other ways. However, we have here a case of mistaken identity. Unity School of Christianity, and its affiliated churches, are very specifically Christian, a Bible-centered version of New Thought and strongly focused on prayer. UU is not a bit like that. Welcomes atheists, agnostics, pagans, and followers of every religion. Check out this website that gives info on 8 different UU congregations in the Houston area. Here are the 7 principles of UUism from that site:

No wonder I was disappointed! Now I know. I doubt my GF will want to try a different place, though, as she did enjoy her experience at Unity. I may have to try the UUs on my own.