Rachel's excuse for the Hillary infomercial - Bernie wasn't available - ok then what about
Tad Devine? Jeff Weaver? Or even Nina Turner?
Not one person was available to speak for Bernie? Not one person was available to answer the charges thrown against him the night before the nation's first primary?
That's not journalism. That's faux news.
Which brings me to my second question? If Bernie is supposed to win NH and Hillary is not - why was Hillary available? Did she think doing an infomercial instead of meeting with voters was a better idea?
Baffled by the entire thing.
= new reply since forum marked as read
when I saw that the night before a primary. 
It did indeed come off like an infomercial and I frankly question Rachel's judgement in allowing ANY candidate such access at such a crucial time. Beyond that, it should have been both or none, if it was going to happen at all.
