Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

grntuscarora

(1,249 posts) Tue Feb 9, 2016, 07:13 PM Feb 2016

The scuttlebutt says Bernie'll be on the PA primary ballot:)

8,000 signatures collected (and counting)-- well beyond the 2,000 minimum!

The Keystone State is getting ready for the Bern!

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The scuttlebutt says Bernie'll be on the PA primary ballot:) (Original Post) grntuscarora Feb 2016 OP

Nice job PA! daleanime Feb 2016 #1

Bernie should do well. Lots of folks in PA screwed out of their jobs SDjack Feb 2016 #2

Don't stop petitioning if it is still possible. mikehiggins Feb 2016 #3

Bernie delegates still need signatures! PADemD Feb 2016 #4

daleanime

(17,796 posts)

1. Nice job PA!

Reply to grntuscarora (Original post)

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 07:14 PM

Feb 2016

Keep it up!

SDjack

(1,448 posts)

2. Bernie should do well. Lots of folks in PA screwed out of their jobs

Reply to grntuscarora (Original post)

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 08:09 PM

Feb 2016

and pensions by Republicans and 3rd-way Democrats. Here is their opportunity to push back. Vote Bernie2016.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)

3. Don't stop petitioning if it is still possible.

Reply to grntuscarora (Original post)

Tue Feb 9, 2016, 08:13 PM

Feb 2016

You CANNOT have enough signatures, no matter how many the rules require.

80,000 might be enough if you're going up against the Establishment.

You wonder how low they can go? Just wondering if that is even a question says you have no idea.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)

4. Bernie delegates still need signatures!

Reply to grntuscarora (Original post)

Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:47 AM

Feb 2016

Reply to this discussion