...rounds of the primaries/caucuses....

Alas.

on another thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/110744638

Someone threw out the dog whistle in favor of a full-on bullhorn. Nothing subtle about that OP, is there?

as well. I'm saddened by at least one of those. But true colors come out ...

It's who and what they are, after all.

...commentator, and hew to such notions in autumn, should it come to that.

and couldn't handle the sameness.

But I am a pluviophile, after all and I like a bit a snow

Especially fog.

Luckily, I get back pretty often...

It makes me more present to it.

Have a great day!

So I alerted it!

It certainly warranted it to me.

so I went and looked, and you weren't. How terribly disappointing their hosts didn't lock it... I see it was hidden by jury, which is at least somewhat encouraging. I know it's highly contentious here these days, but man, some people are really losing it.

Wonder how much longer that soggy bulwark will keep holding here...

Disgraceful.

Thank you jury.

nt

I don't think DU will ever be the same after this election. There's just been too much ugliness-- personal and political, for some to get over. It's a shame.

n/t

I try really hard to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially with long-time members.

One of the hosts is the owner/admin of that most vile hatefilled site that was started simply to spew vitriol at Bernie and his supporters.

Another posted several smearmongering OPs which were blatant lies about Bernie, one of which is the infamous "Not Good Enough, Bernie" OP.

And oddly enough, another of the hosts posted some nasty cartoons about Hillary in 2008 that called her a LIAR and sexist. How people can have so much hate for someone and express that hate and then turn around to support them is beyond me.

SMH

.

I've always thought that particular host to be a kind and thoughtful person, and when sites start-up, sometimes it's rocky. I may disagree with them at times to my core, but to each their own. I don't frequent the site. I rarely interact with any of those members now days... but I won't disparage them in our protected group. That's not what we're about.

Pfft.

.

I wasn't here for the 2004 primaries. Did they use black-face videos to illustrate their points? Maybe some Stepin Fetchit videos to accompany their rants about Obama's supposed ineffectualness in Congress? I'm just gonna assume they did and I was lucky enough to miss it.

The thing is, SL could have made his point just fine without the video. But I guess he wanted to add a little extra splash of racism to the melange.

Oh -- I see now that it's been hidden. I dunno. Sometimes I think it's better to have this stuff out in the open so people can see what they're dealing with.

Hillary "unfit to be president". What a strange place du has become

...isn't the nominee?

Isn't that a pronounced violation of the TOS. The very kind they yell about so loudly?

I would love to see that.

Though of course you can "unhide" it to get a look at it in all its anti-Semitic, Republican-supporting glory...

or who recommended it.

I was wondering about the one where our "hot national pundit" friend tells others to vote Republican.

...to head off a "worse" GOP "landslide," or whatever, after four dastardly years of a Bernie administration...

Which, of course, they wouldn't.

I didn't think Hillary supporters on DU would stoop that low. I'm honestly stunned.

...over the 6-1 hide. A vote ratio indicating the post was pretty obvious to everyone.

That could very well be a bannable offense, and they should know about it.