That's the UK, where they call the Prime Minister Mr. or Mrs.

A New York Times editorial. I guess they must be British?

The Times adheres to the custom of not allowing people to use titles of offices they no longer hold. Only a former president is entitled to be addressed as "Mister President" or "Madam President." (thinking nine years ahead here) Former governors, senators, mayors, city council members, sewer and water commissioners, etc. revert to Mr. or Ms. or Mrs. when they leave office. The NY Times goes even further, using Mrs. Clinton because she uses her husband's family name. If she went by Hillary Rodham, I think they would call her Ms. Rodham, or maybe Miss Rodham. Somebody else here might know, since they publish a style book for journalists, and it can be found in just about every newspaper in the country.

Anyway, her campaign doesn't like Mrs. Clinton because they feel it diminishes her accomplishments and implies she is riding on her husband's reputation.

Not very nuanced, to say the least. I'm sure Clinton doesn't want to prevent people from seeking asylum, but the "turn them back at the border" thing makes me wonder what asylum seekers are supposed to do.