Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:40 PM Feb 2016

To attack, or not to attack?

I have to hand it to the Brock/Clinton campaign, there's a certain evil genius to their current strategy of getting civil rights icons to lie on Hillary's behalf. It means that Bernie and his supporters are caught between the Scylla of "attacking" them with the truth and potentially alienating minority voters, and the Charybdes of leaving the lie unopposed and letting your opponents frame the narrative, John Kerry style. So, which is the less bad option?


3 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Attacking a civil rights icon
2 (67%)
Leaving a lie unopposed
1 (33%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
1. I hate to put it this way but
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:47 PM
Feb 2016

There are some BAD people who are considered heroes in their time as well.

In the end, a title is just a title. Are you a good person or a bad person? That's what really matters. All the good deeds in the world won't cover your ass if you do wrong.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
2. If you are going to attack
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:47 PM
Feb 2016

It's not John Lewis or Dolores Huertas that you attack.

Attack Hillary or don't attack.

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
4. S/he is an icon? That's "My mother, drunk or sober" defense
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:56 PM
Feb 2016

She's a great mom and has done great things, but if she gets wasted and nearly burns down the house, a critique of her behavior may be necessary. Past behavior isn't a CYA. As for the alienating minorities, as every mother since the beginning of time has said, "I love you; I don't like what you're doing."

Further, that's assuming that every member of a minority can't figure out what's really going on.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
6. Traditionally, when attacked, Bernie's strategy is keep it on the issues and push forward
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 12:58 PM
Feb 2016

That's one of the things that has made him an exceptional candidate (literally) in campaign after campaign. He runs a positive campaign and trusts the public to see through the garbage. I hope he continues to do so. The minute his campaign diverts into attacking, particularly anything beyond policy criticism, is the minute that, for many, he's just another politician.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
8. plus it makes the attacker on the Clinton side look a bit false
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 03:37 PM
Feb 2016

when they double down or keep up a claim debunked in detail

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»To attack, or not to atta...