Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumCheering the complete corporate takeover of our Party
And God forbid we bring up the gender reference but they sure can.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)Make no mistake- we're the enemy. Maybe more so than the Repugs.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)So no nasty words or truth can penetrate it. The first female loser candidate. I'm ashamed really. This is the best shit they can give us. Felony Clinton.
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Bernin4U
(812 posts)...for not getting fully behind her in the first place, of course.
mike dub
(541 posts)yep, that guy's still on it
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)Cheering the complete corporate takeover of our Party
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280130902
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is a direct callout of another DUer and is done so in a place where the called out DUer cannot answer.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:57 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I really, really, really hate the crap the primary fight produces
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No reason for an alert.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Enough with the crybaby. This is not alert worthy.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: call out hide.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not seeing the issue here. The other poster DID post that on DU, yes? We can all see the post. What has this OP done but to allow people to read words they can already read? If this had been a screencap of a private message it might be different but I can't see anything wrong with this.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The first female nominee for President of the United States was in 1872.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Woodhull
When you're claiming to be making history, you should probably bother to learn about history first.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)That's why I don't like the Democratic Party.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)So nothing else matters.
Ironically, if I wind up voting for her in the GE that will probably be the main reason. I would like to see a woman become President.
Most Clinton posters seem to be Democrats for social and cultural issues only.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)[font size=3]"Inclusion"[/font size]. Aw, ain't that special?
That one will surely bring us back after all that's been said about Bernie supporters.
Bettie
(16,110 posts)those of us who support Sanders or "inclusion" of all of the right wing?
Because the latter seems more likely than the former, given how much hate there is for liberals among the Clinton people.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Because I still cannot understand how any rational person can go pedal-to-the-metal for another Clinton.
I just do not get it.
No More Clintons!
(The thought of sleaze bag Slick Willie in the White House nauseates me.)
Bernin4U
(812 posts)They can be total dicks to Obama supporters in 07/08, total dicks to us now, but expect that all will be forgiven by the convention.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Uninformed.
Reminds me of this pronunciation from a Hillary supporter: "WE DON'T WANT YOU AND WE DON'T NEED YOU!"
Classy bunch.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)A week is a long time in politics
arfcorps
(21 posts)So when HRC goes negative against Drumpf, you explain this how?
Bet Bernie wasn't invited...
"