The Clinton campaign staff devoutly believes you cannot underestimate the intelligence of the American voter.

C'mon. As if using Daily Mail as a source for an attack wasn't bad enough.

If you can't dispute the truth, attack the messenger. Par for the course.

But I believe we generally try to avoid linking and referencing extreme and fringe right wing sites.

Alrighty then.

here which doesn't mean most people agree with the 'attack the messenger' tactic.

If there is anything in the links that is inaccurate then please, point it out. Otherwise I assume the info is accurate.

Any more than I'd go to Breitbart for facts.

That's what I'm saying. If you want to use Michelle Malkin's site as a source, I think you're doing yourself, and the site, a disservice. Surely there aren't extreme right wing sites that can be used to prove the same exact point?

ARE corroborated by every other source I've seen on the subject, so saw not need to question it.

He does not denigrate Hillary Clinton, nor have I heard her say a word about Bernie. It is possible for Dems to love both of them. Show some class, please.

his dishonest smear of Bernie. Now run along because this group is for Bernie supporters.

if you "love" any political candidate. Why would you even say you "love" a political candidate? That's in the realm of a teenage crush on a celebrity. And you know, since you told me to show some class, I suggest that crushing on a politician is neither mature nor classy. So I reply to you that it's time to show some maturity, face the facts of HRC's staged "listening" tour, and reply with some defense of the staging - if you can come up with one.

Further, reporting facts about a candidate is not "denigrating" them. That would happen if I attacked her reputation by defaming her, which would involve the legal actions constituting slander or libel, i.e., stating an untruth damaging to her reputation. I learned about that way back in law school. Sadly, we did not have a class in, nor did the bar exam test on "showing some class". In this primary season, supporting Bernie involves convincing undecided voters that Bernie is a superior candidate, as well as convincing present HRC supporters of that fact as well. That includes publicizing inconvenient truths about her staged listening tour.

We're not debating anything related to "class" here. I'm not challenging her wardrobe or hairstyling choices - I'm pointing out that it is reported in international press (link to UK paper above) and in the Iowa press that she staged her meet and greet tour, replacing ostensible everyday citizens with her own campaign workers and a county Democratic party chairwoman, president of a college young dems group, executive with a planned parenthood group, etc. In Iowa, former Woodbury County Democratic Party Chairman Al Sturgeon — derided those stops where she met only a few people at businesses and colleges as staged.
http://globegazette.com/news/local/clinton-campaign-announces-sioux-city-visit/article_bf0a86d7-facd-58ab-8c09-c47c71bc3b08.html

his 'the socialist' smear? I ask because I saw no apology from the Clinton campaign. I hope no one from Bernie's campaign will stoop that low frankly.

...great crowd!

Amazing.

Tonight...I am one SAD PANDA.

went to a bigger venue, still overflowed with people, some had to stay outside, but at least more people were able to hear him. Same thing might happen, you never know.

Well, if Bernie is a loser, then I am all in!

Feel the Bern, naysayers!

time someone 'who can't win' won.

Go, Bernie!

All those people in the audience, they're only there looking out for their own best interests. How dare they do such a thing!

it doesn't say if people were out in the hallway listening on loud speakers or not. Either way lots of people and the message is being heard.

chance for bipartisanship, instead of the ' Third Way ' political society with no aisle, morals, or alligence to anything but themselves.