Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:09 AM Mar 2016

Nader: What Will Many Bernie Sanders Voters Do After July?

Yes, I know this basically starts on the assumption that we'll lose, but he raises a few important points.

Hillary’s rhetoric has outraged Sanders’ supporters. She berates Sanders regularly for not being practical or realistic about his Medicare-for-all, breaking up big banks, a $15 minimum wage, a tax on Wall Street speculation and carbon and getting big money out of politics. Clinton’s putdowns exemplify why so many people who back Sanders want to defeat her. Clinton is the candidate of the status quo, favored over all other candidates from both parties by the Wall Street crowd and quietly adored by the military-industrial complex who see Generalissima Clinton as a militarist who would maintain the warfare state.

Here we go again. Every four years, the Democratic leaders define the Democratic candidate by how bad the Republicans are. This is designed to panic and mute their followers. Every four years, both parties become more corporatist. Sanders’ voters want to define the Democratic Party by how good it can be for the people. And these Sanders voters may not go back into the Democratic Party fold.

It is doubtful whether Hillary will credibly adopt any of Bernie’s agenda, considering where her campaign money is coming from and how unwilling she is to alienate her circle of advisors. Where does this leave the Sanders people who see Hillary as experienced in waging wars, qualified as an entrenched pol, and realistic to suit the plutocracy’s tastes, and not really getting much of anything progressive done (alluding to the ways she has described herself)?

The energetic Sanders supporters, including the Millennials who voted so heavily for Bernie, could form a New Progressive movement to exercise a policy pull on the establishment Democrats before November and to be a growing magnet after November with the objective of taking over the Democratic Party starting with winning local elections. This will have long-term benefits for our country.

Full article: http://commondreams.org/views/2016/03/05/what-will-many-bernie-sanders-voters-do-after-july

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nader: What Will Many Bernie Sanders Voters Do After July? (Original Post) Mufaddal Mar 2016 OP
I like Nader bernbabe Mar 2016 #1
I like him in general, but he was an ass after the 2000 election. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #27
This Citizen Will Go Dark On DU - Vote Their Conscience - Then Be Here After The General cantbeserious Mar 2016 #2
I'm with you. Fawke Em Mar 2016 #7
your razor sharp comments will be missed restorefreedom Mar 2016 #32
Hillary likes to have target groups. Just have to see Downwinder Mar 2016 #3
it will be "shut up and eat your spinach" and "ha ha, who else are you going to vote for lefty?" corkhead Mar 2016 #5
Jill Stein. Fawke Em Mar 2016 #8
Jill Stein is our spinach. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #28
Depends on where you live. Fawke Em Mar 2016 #33
I'd like to see the energy continue, like we've seen on the new site JPR riderinthestorm Mar 2016 #4
Depending on how things go in the next few months, a new party is entirely possible Hydra Mar 2016 #6
Go take a nice long walk, tune out the news, TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #9
Enough. This is all we heard yesterday - TBF Mar 2016 #10
Depends AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #11
Change registration to Ind and work locally oldandhappy Mar 2016 #12
and write-in Bernie oldandhappy Mar 2016 #13
nadar has a lot of room to talk. mopinko Mar 2016 #14
He can always find beltanefauve Mar 2016 #16
yup. mopinko Mar 2016 #17
Sanders supporters shall RoccoR5955 Mar 2016 #15
That's the way it's going to be. ladyVet Mar 2016 #25
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #18
I was at the DNC protests in Boston way back when Mufaddal Mar 2016 #19
Agreed. And progressives should aim for just that scale..If B. Hussein Obama can get elected, hillarysong2016 Mar 2016 #21
let's be frank: they blamed Nader to take the GOP off the hook MisterP Mar 2016 #20
They blamed Nader for Gore's bad platform Mufaddal Mar 2016 #22
If Al Gore SheenaR Mar 2016 #23
they can't let themselves realize that it was their half of Gore's platform that cost him votes MisterP Mar 2016 #24
You only get to say things like this IF YOU'RE DOING EVERYTHING TO GET HIM ELECTED! MrMickeysMom Mar 2016 #26
"There's not a dime's worth of difference between Al Gore and George Bush" greenman3610 Mar 2016 #29
We may disagree there Mufaddal Mar 2016 #30
Dear Mr. Nader...I am NOT even worrying about such a thing. SoapBox Mar 2016 #31

bernbabe

(370 posts)
1. I like Nader
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:17 AM
Mar 2016

I always thought he had genuine good intentions. I don't think we've had a president with truly good intentions since Carter.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
27. I like him in general, but he was an ass after the 2000 election.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:50 AM
Mar 2016

He took positive glee at the time at being viewed as having played the 'spoiler' role, even if the reality was far different.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
2. This Citizen Will Go Dark On DU - Vote Their Conscience - Then Be Here After The General
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:19 AM
Mar 2016

Reminding how disastrous HRC turns out to be.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
7. I'm with you.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:29 AM
Mar 2016

I plan to do the same.

I don't think she'll win because Millennials won't GOTV, Independents will either not vote, vote Green or, Heaven forbid, vote Trump because they don't like the establishment and Republicans will crawl naked over broken glass to vote against her.

Disastrous is right - in that she can't win and, even if she does, nothing will change.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
32. your razor sharp comments will be missed
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016

if only temporarily

post general will be very interesting, no matter who wins imo



Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
28. Jill Stein is our spinach.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:52 AM
Mar 2016

I think I'm going to run for something next cycle. Something small, something local, but the question is whether to run as a Green or a Socialist.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
4. I'd like to see the energy continue, like we've seen on the new site JPR
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:23 AM
Mar 2016

can become a springboard for a new progressive party perhaps, or at least a coordinated effort to begin real pushback on the corporatists

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
6. Depending on how things go in the next few months, a new party is entirely possible
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:29 AM
Mar 2016

And perhaps another on on the Repub side.

This energy is not going away though. It was there during the Bush Admin, it was there in 2008, it was there in 2010, it was there in OWS and it's still here now, only stronger. The Establishment Dems have done everything they can to bury it, but the Left will not become part of the "One America" RW they are wishing for.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
11. Depends
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:39 AM
Mar 2016

If I can identify another candidate who will fight for the people against the corporations, I will vote for that person.

mopinko

(70,121 posts)
14. nadar has a lot of room to talk.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 12:21 PM
Mar 2016

if HE had done this, where would we be now? but no, sat back on his bank roll, and pops up every 4 years to wag his finger at the dems.

mopinko

(70,121 posts)
17. yup.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:39 PM
Mar 2016

he had a great platform, which he folded up and stuck in the closet.
now he lectures others. oy.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
15. Sanders supporters shall
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 01:44 PM
Mar 2016

go out and campaign for him for president after July, because he shall be the nominee!

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
25. That's the way it's going to be.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:36 AM
Mar 2016

I'm not worrying about Bernie. He's running a brilliant campaign, gaining ground daily, and is getting out the right message despite all efforts to silence him and his supporters.

Enough with the doom and gloom, oh woe is me stuff. Stop falling for the corporate media shit sandwiches.

If we keep fighting for him, he's got this.

Response to Mufaddal (Original post)

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
19. I was at the DNC protests in Boston way back when
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 02:44 PM
Mar 2016

They sent Kucinich out to try and placate us right before the police started firing off tear gas and hitting people.

That particular mass civil disobedience (which was pretty damned large) didn't really produce any tangible results. That's not an argument against protest, but simply to say that it would need to be on a scale not seen since 1968.

 

hillarysong2016

(83 posts)
21. Agreed. And progressives should aim for just that scale..If B. Hussein Obama can get elected,
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:20 PM
Mar 2016

and Arab Americans endorsing a Jewish 74 year old from Vermont, and Jews and Arabs and Muslims holding joint demonstrations for BLM, among other examples, we can, while being sober and realistic as we can, allow ourselves to return to "anything is possible" type of energy in the movement!

Are there groups or coalitions who might be up for it, working together? Names and links? Maybe worth a new thread..anyone?

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
20. let's be frank: they blamed Nader to take the GOP off the hook
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:12 PM
Mar 2016

when someone blames Nader, they're approving of Jeb's voter caging
when someone blames Nader, they're approving of the Brooks Brothers riot
when someone blames Nader, they're approving of Katherine Harris's voter purge and direct intervention
when someone blames Nader, they're keeping the Dem party able to shrug off facts and reality

after 15 years of passing GOP policies, running Pubs as Dems, sabotaging the better-polling primary candidates, torpedoing and gerrymandering those who won the primary if they upset the gravy train, and leaving Gore out to dry on the Congress floor, it's clear the never blamed Nader because he'd cost Gore Florida

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
22. They blamed Nader for Gore's bad platform
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 03:33 PM
Mar 2016

in the same way HRC supporters currently blame Bernie for Hillary's bad platform (well, whatever planks in it that she hasn't ripped right out of Bernie's campaign).

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
26. You only get to say things like this IF YOU'RE DOING EVERYTHING TO GET HIM ELECTED!
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:50 AM
Mar 2016

Talk is cheap, and yes.... so is revolt and marches.

Let the rubber hit the road. I'm not assuming you're not doing this, but IF YOU'RE NOT, then enough of the, "what will you do?"

Instead, I'm putting the question to all of you....WHAT WILL YOU DO?

Will you phone bank when you get off work and talk to others in the upcoming states?

Will you insist that you letter to the editor correct the local paper's deficit of information regarding Sanders?

Will you organize locally to hand out material in areas of your own city where people don't know Bernie as much?

THIS AND THIS ONLY is the least you can do. Talk is but one thing. ACTION, quite another!

greenman3610

(3,947 posts)
29. "There's not a dime's worth of difference between Al Gore and George Bush"
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:37 AM
Mar 2016

unfortunately, this logic, brought to us by someone I used to consider a hero, did not turn out well.
Long past time for Nader to shut up.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
30. We may disagree there
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:28 AM
Mar 2016

There is probably 9¢ worth of difference, but a dime? I think Gore would have continued Clinton's policies of beating up on the most poor and vulnerable, of mass incarceration, and Clintonian foreign policy to the extent that I think we'd still have had the Iraq war, albeit perhaps on slightly different terms. But I think Bush was so bad that people forget what the Clinton-Gore machine was actually like for the working class in this country, as well as what their FP was.

But of course, the answer there was for Gore to actually move to the left instead of continuing with the Third Way garbage. I've said it before and I'll say it again: it's not Bernie's fault that Hillary's platform stinks by comparison, and it wasn't Nader's fault that Gore's platform stunk by comparison. It's not Bernie's job to get you to vote for Hillary, and it wasn't Nader's job to get you to vote for Gore.

Now, can there be reasonable disagreement about these things? As you and others here have illustrated, yes there can be. Obviously this is just my own view. I don't deny there is a good argument to be made against it.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
31. Dear Mr. Nader...I am NOT even worrying about such a thing.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:39 AM
Mar 2016

And I will not bring it up...it sets up a mind set that we will lose...well I will not even consider losing.

Be Positive!

Be Strong!

And Go, Go for Bernie!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Nader: What Will Many Ber...