keeping things as far from reality or any even remotely possibly negative thought about their Hillary...

I just asked if the Democratic Party in Michigan runs their own primary like they do in Texas. If so it would be the Democratic Party's fault for not having enough ballots, no Governor Snyder. As much as I dislike Snyder, he can't be blame if the Democrats are in charge their own primary. Instead of an answer I got asked about my Henry Kissinger remarks. Still no answer. I told them if they wanted to question my posts they should question them where I post them.

is the equivalent of trying to nail jello to a wall.

I am surprised you weren't block on the spot.

I never post there. But I do go there and read. I haven't posted anything there criticizing Hillary. Do you get anything telling you that you are blocked, or do you just try to post and you can't?

...I know because I got one on my only post in that group. All I did was ask for a link for something anti-Bernie that someone was alleging.

....regarding Hillary's roundabout answer during the last debate in Michigan, and was promptly banned. All you receive is a message in your DU inbox that yyhave been banned. You can't even view the thread any longer.

Are these people liberals? When did people from the Democratic party begin silencing someone when they question the support of a candidate that supports fracking? Just seems crazy to me. Anyway, after last night I hope Hillary gets shown for the fake she is. If she gets the nomination, and I'm just curious about responses from others, who wouldn't vote for her and would either abstain or just write in Sanders?

Even somewhat neutral material gets you ousted.

Real profiles in courage in that group.

#246 on the blocked list!

My apologies.

Sanders group
Number of subscribers: 924
Number of people trashing: 165
Number banned: 283
Ratio of subscribers to banned: 3.27

Clinton group
Number of subscribers: 347
Number of people trashing: 279
Number banned: 660
Ratio of subscribers to banned: 0.53

get by on Social Security.

and I find I still don't have a high enough dosage to weather the Stepford aura that place radiates.

Their country club is very stuffy, anyway.

___________________
HRC Group exile #607.

I like looking at their links and reposting them in GD-Primaries and here where they get discussed. Of course, that might get me banned but shouldn't.

or facts that are twisted. I suggest you put up a post in GDP directly asking if there is any proof Gov. Snyder was behind them running out of ballots in Michigan and see if anyone has any sources to back up that allegation.

If they are trying to imply that Hillary would have won if there were enough ballots, the math says no. Bernie was running a steady percentage above Hillary throughout the night and more ballots would have yielded the same percentage IMHO.

One HRC moderator banned me for "trolling," another hid me for asking why.

It's a grave-dancing echo chamber that is best avoided.

and get banned from Camp Weathervane already.
They seem to live in their own world over there.

Took long enough, tbh-- I'm sorry but that maudlin-ass fit pitching that really belongs the hell on other less enlightened social networks served as my pilot light last night. Reminds me of my sociopath of an ex, in a way, you're either doing things her way, or you're a racist/sexist/misogynist/-ist of the day and deserve to be dragged through the streets.

And they call us the authoritarians.

I am a low number... 49 (Ron Guidry, P, NY Yankees)

I can't even read the comments over there. The "dying swan" threads about how the Bernie group is so mean and oppressive and quick to block people.

Their projection is state of the art.

in the primary plus the crossovers. Sanders shattered that expectation via the crossover votes. No sense in trying to find blame for something that defied expectations, especially since it worked out so well in the end.

I'm noticing a lot of posts trying to find reasons to smear Dem process as well as the Dem party. I think it stinks, especially since I think it diminishes us and our credibility, overall, when it comes time to call out REAL problems that occur.

They're just emulating their idol. No YES or NO answers - just questions in response to questions. It's a strategy - a DUMB strategy - but a strategy nonetheless.

but the other day my computer shut down (power surge) and of course when it was turned back on I had "logged out" of DU. So when I clicked on the site I saw a whole buncha crap I've been "missing." I had to laugh: I clicked on one thread, in the Hillary group (unbeknownst to me) and found about 5 of my least favorite posters talking only to each other. It was pathetic, really.