Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
145 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WillieT Appreciation thread - For being a Loud-N-Proud Bernie Supporter! (Original Post) Bubzer Mar 2016 OP
WillyT was a great contributor here. The Hillary fanatics got another notch in their belt. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #1
+1 Electric Monk Mar 2016 #59
Time out or banned outright? Does any one have a list of those who got amnesty to return here? peacebird Mar 2016 #2
Those who got him banned were multiple timeouters who got amnesty. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #4
That's why i would like a list of those who repcvd amnesty so I can preemptively block them peacebird Mar 2016 #9
I don't have such a list, but replying to your post would likely get someone a hide merrily Mar 2016 #86
No one comes back. The admins must love the begging though... Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #15
Not true. I know of no one to the left who came back, though. merrily Mar 2016 #87
Banned. merrily Mar 2016 #85
I liked most of his posts Rebkeh Mar 2016 #3
I agree 100%, Rebkeh. fleur-de-lisa Mar 2016 #5
Why don't you google 840high Mar 2016 #53
It doesn't matter what it means Rebkeh Mar 2016 #90
Please stop it. My personal opinion is that taking pot shots at someone who already got merrily Mar 2016 #91
Pot shots? Rebkeh Mar 2016 #93
Pot shots because he can't reply and is already banned. merrily Mar 2016 #96
No. There are consequences Rebkeh Mar 2016 #99
Straw man, I didn't say there should not be consequences. I said not on this thread. There are other merrily Mar 2016 #102
I got the distinct impression he wouldn't listen to me so I didn't bother Rebkeh Mar 2016 #116
Thanks for confirming I was right about you. merrily Mar 2016 #117
What crap. polly7 Mar 2016 #118
He should have let it die, Rebkeh Mar 2016 #121
Why? polly7 Mar 2016 #126
You don't know what it means then. 840high Mar 2016 #95
Okay. I'm tryin' here Rebkeh Mar 2016 #97
Stop crapping on Bubzer's thread. merrily Mar 2016 #98
I'm not Rebkeh Mar 2016 #101
Bullshit. That's exactly what you are doing and you know it. merrily Mar 2016 #103
They weren't racist comments in that article he posted polly7 Mar 2016 #133
This message was self-deleted by its author Bubzer Mar 2016 #8
Really? Well, I respect your right to attempt a positive thread about a departed Sanders supporter merrily Mar 2016 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author Bubzer Mar 2016 #142
Fair enough . TheFarS1de Mar 2016 #50
Also agreed Scootaloo Mar 2016 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author merrily Mar 2016 #88
Can someone PM a copy of the offending Willy post? Baitball Blogger Mar 2016 #6
Joining the list: Manny L0oniX NY_SKP ...more to come. Visit them over on JPR. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #7
When L0oniX was banned, I knew it was Manny next, the same when he was banned rhett o rick Mar 2016 #11
I might be next ...but I wouldn't give a shit about it. There's good people on JPR. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #13
The way I see it, there is no debating issues with the other side. They won't debate. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #16
Why try to debate with pro oligarchy serfs. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #19
I agree. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #22
I'll bet we can predict that with great accuracy yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #18
I'm curious who you think it might be. PM me? Bubzer Mar 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author rhett o rick Mar 2016 #30
I think you're right. Bubzer Mar 2016 #33
Did you tell the posters involved what you suspected was going to happen to them? If not, why not? merrily Mar 2016 #92
Willie T was the best. JDPriestly Mar 2016 #10
The better Sanders does the worse it will get in here. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #12
It's pathetic if they think what they do here will have any real affect. Ivan Kaputski Mar 2016 #20
It's not about money it's about power. Clinton wants power, the non-progressive here want power. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #31
I don't know if Hillary is getting their money. Some here maybe getting hers, who knows? merrily Mar 2016 #94
To WillieT... TheProgressive Mar 2016 #14
. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #17
Cheers to WillyT Voice for Peace Mar 2016 #21
Cheers and a hug, Dear WillyT! Pastiche423 Mar 2016 #143
Cheers to Willy T. polly7 Mar 2016 #23
Just 1 more reason to visit JPR more often... smiley Mar 2016 #24
After a few days . . . Depaysement Mar 2016 #25
Trust me that doesn't work even if he wanted to and I doubt that. They use rhett o rick Mar 2016 #34
Agreed Depaysement Mar 2016 #40
It is an opinion in an attempt to explain why the AA community would chose the rhett o rick Mar 2016 #41
Like I said Depaysement Mar 2016 #45
I find it appalling that a certain member floriduck Mar 2016 #26
Especially melman Mar 2016 #29
I'm not surprised at all. She's been hating on Jewish people for some time now. arcane1 Mar 2016 #35
That's really ugly and scary. madfloridian Mar 2016 #49
I don't know whether to cry or whether to throw something choie Mar 2016 #54
You think that's bad? white_wolf Mar 2016 #62
Wasn't that sick? I couldn't believe it. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #66
Should have been BANNED for that. It was much worse than what those who have polly7 Mar 2016 #67
Wow, that's pretty blatant. progressoid Mar 2016 #70
WOW 840high Mar 2016 #110
Wowza. merrily Mar 2016 #114
That attention-starved member will do anything to feed that hunger n/t arcane1 Mar 2016 #32
It's a tactic they have for trying to intimidate progressives here. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #42
Yes. That one gets 840high Mar 2016 #55
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #56
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #65
Someone not too BRAVE iN mAKing inflammatory posts? BillZBubb Mar 2016 #64
lol Hiraeth Mar 2016 #123
that poster has no class. none. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #81
Thank you, WillyT, for your thousands of vital posts! Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #27
I love WillyT, Blue_In_AK Mar 2016 #36
We have lost the only power we had via the jury system. I am surprised that we even have alerts rhett o rick Mar 2016 #43
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #72
........ polly7 Mar 2016 #73
Lol. You simply do not like the point Rhett made about abusing power. Bullying. seabeyond Mar 2016 #74
Who do you think you're kidding? melman Mar 2016 #75
;) seabeyond Mar 2016 #77
Lol. You simply didn't get it. polly7 Mar 2016 #76
You are right. seabeyond Mar 2016 #78
An apology for posting in the wrong group, but not for what you said, eh? polly7 Mar 2016 #130
"They" are blocked and "they" can't respond. Autumn Mar 2016 #134
Oh, I didn't realize that. Thanks, Autumn. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #136
Anybody see this? Autumn Mar 2016 #138
Yes, I saw it. polly7 Mar 2016 #139
I said at least we had a recourse to keep the bullies at bay. Now we don't even have that. rhett o rick Mar 2016 #79
Please don't ask her to reply. She needs to be blocked from this group. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #80
I agree. Those that side with the Big Money and ignore those struggling won't listen. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #82
Since Skinner did what he did, which is fine this is his business after all, this is our only Hiraeth Mar 2016 #83
I thought she was blocked long ago. merrily Mar 2016 #105
evidently not. maybe this is her first time posting in here but, could one of the hosts please block Hiraeth Mar 2016 #108
Did you alert or pm a host? They can't read every post in the group and some of them host merrily Mar 2016 #111
no. I did not alert. Sorry. Should I alert on this one? or if you will take care and alert on this Hiraeth Mar 2016 #119
If you want to alert on this, go ahead. if the one from yesterday is the same poster, you can merrily Mar 2016 #120
I am sorry. The only alert I see will send it to jury. I don't understand how to send it to hosts of Hiraeth Mar 2016 #122
The instructions on how to alert the hosts are in a pinned post in this group. merrily Mar 2016 #124
oh. derp. looking now. thanks Hiraeth Mar 2016 #125
Well, can't an account still get "reviewed" for a time or, as in some cases, eternally? merrily Mar 2016 #100
It appears to me that the Admins took control and obviously they are letting some rhett o rick Mar 2016 #106
I was making a different point. IOW, just because some appear to have carte blanche merrily Mar 2016 #109
I did miss your point. I agree that while some are free to say whatever they want, others might be rhett o rick Mar 2016 #113
It's good you did. That makes it more clear. Maybe I should do an OP for this group. merrily Mar 2016 #115
WillyT Jane Austin Mar 2016 #37
Cheers Willy T, you were a good DU buddy. mahina Mar 2016 #38
I had my say in the GD announcement thread and did what I usually do senz Mar 2016 #39
Several Sanders supporters could not bring themselves to either stay the fuck off merrily Mar 2016 #107
I agree, merrily. senz Mar 2016 #140
We love you, WillyT. You are dearly missed. DamnYankeeInHouston Mar 2016 #44
I know Willy asked for it, but considering the Doom and Gloom squad back and empowered Hydra Mar 2016 #46
Damn this is a tough blow farleftlib Mar 2016 #47
This is a real low blow. SoapBox Mar 2016 #48
I salute WillyT. CentralMass Mar 2016 #51
WillieT you are the best! jillan Mar 2016 #57
He was not a Bernie Supporter. Skwmom Mar 2016 #58
do you have a link to that post? Thanks Hiraeth Mar 2016 #84
No. I don't remember the exact post. It was after Iowa or NH I believe. Skwmom Mar 2016 #128
interesting and I don't doubt it. Hiraeth Mar 2016 #129
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #145
thank you for pointing to the truth hopemountain Mar 2016 #60
All the good ones are being tossed out emsimon33 Mar 2016 #61
He Does! He's there now! Bubzer Mar 2016 #69
Thankyouthankyouthankyou!!!!!!! emsimon33 Mar 2016 #104
D'awwww.... You're welcome! Bubzer Mar 2016 #112
I miss him already. nt morningglory Mar 2016 #127
he spoke the truth, which is why they wanted him out. restorefreedom Mar 2016 #63
... glinda Mar 2016 #68
he made a lot of good contributions to this place dana_b Mar 2016 #71
I miss you, WillyT! Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #131
Miss Seeing You Here WillieT noretreatnosurrender Mar 2016 #132
Never seen a tombstone with the name spelled wrong GusBob Mar 2016 #135
What? nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #137
Nnnnnoooooooooooooooo! Howler Mar 2016 #141
The concept "stalkholm syndrome" has been made taboo, delrem Mar 2016 #144

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
2. Time out or banned outright? Does any one have a list of those who got amnesty to return here?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:35 PM
Mar 2016


I have already blocked four today that I remembered as being amongst the worst agitators, & swarm alerters. Would like to go ahead and block the rest so They can't take me down.
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
4. Those who got him banned were multiple timeouters who got amnesty.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

Pretty clear a purge is underway.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
9. That's why i would like a list of those who repcvd amnesty so I can preemptively block them
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:42 PM
Mar 2016

I've been subjected to the swarm alert attack in the past, & blocked four names this morning.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
86. I don't have such a list, but replying to your post would likely get someone a hide
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:20 PM
Mar 2016

for allegedly maligning DUers.

I juried on a post today that got what was in my opinion a ridiculous hide, but it is what it is.

 

Ivan Kaputski

(528 posts)
15. No one comes back. The admins must love the begging though...
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:54 PM
Mar 2016

other wise they wouldn't mention the possibility.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
3. I liked most of his posts
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:36 PM
Mar 2016

But the Stockholm Syndrome thing went too far.

I'm sorry his voice is no longer here but I cannot co-sign "appreciation." I'm sorry.

fleur-de-lisa

(14,628 posts)
5. I agree 100%, Rebkeh.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

He knew he was pushing the boundaries and yet he continued. It's astonishing that there are so many here that applaud his racist comments.

 

840high

(17,196 posts)
53. Why don't you google
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:23 AM
Mar 2016

it and see what it actually means. Do you know how it came to be named such?

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
90. It doesn't matter what it means
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:32 PM
Mar 2016

He crossed a line and when he was called out, he crossed it again! That was a mistake.

There was no winning that battle, he lost view of the end game.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
91. Please stop it. My personal opinion is that taking pot shots at someone who already got
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:38 PM
Mar 2016

banned for whatever sins he or she committed here and cannot defend himself or herself against posts here stinks, no matter who got banned or why.

However, plenty of other DUers undeniably do it and there are threads elsewhere doing that as to WillyT. You should put your negative comments about him there. However, in this group, you should respect the OP's intent and keep your posts positive or neutral. JMO.

I self-deleted my first reply to you about it upthread, but it seems you may keep posting this, so I will leave this reply.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
93. Pot shots?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:48 PM
Mar 2016

I liked him and am sorry to see him go. I just don't co-sign with "appreciation." Which is the intent of the thread.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
96. Pot shots because he can't reply and is already banned.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:52 PM
Mar 2016

Please don't pretend your negative statements about him on this thread are consistent with the OP's intent. One thing may have been thoughtless, though it seems to me like something else; the other is clearly dishonest. If you couldn't "co-sign," you could have stayed off the thread entirely. Again, please just stop.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
102. Straw man, I didn't say there should not be consequences. I said not on this thread. There are other
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:07 PM
Mar 2016

threads for that. Besides which, he is BANNED. That is a consequence. DUH.

Did you do all this while he was still posting here, when he could still defend him, jury your posts, etc.? Or are you doing only now, when he has no recourse, which I personally find cowardly, not to mention disrespectful to Bubzer.

I believe you are the first Sanders supporter I will need to put on ignore. What a distinction! But not until this thread runs its course.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
116. I got the distinct impression he wouldn't listen to me so I didn't bother
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:29 PM
Mar 2016

And I didn't see the need to add to the already present noise telling him to stop. I also trusted others to explain it to him because nine voices is not much quieter than ten. He didn't listen, now that mistake will eclipse all his positive contributions. That's how it works. It's unfortunate.

Again, it's regrettable to see him go. I just won't get on board with the revision of history. That's a consequence, it's not just banning that follows.

And if Willy is reading this, I'm sorry you aren't here anymore. You will be missed. I know your intentions were good, but the unintended consequences had a bigger impact. They frequently do.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
117. Thanks for confirming I was right about you.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:31 PM
Mar 2016

If you didn't think he'd listen to you while he was still here, what positive purpose do you think take pot shots at him when he can't defend himself will serve? Also, I notice you can't stop putting your holier than thou posts on this thread, even though you could start your own thread or post on one of the bash WillyT threads that are not in this group. How many posts do you have to make on this thread before you think you've delivered enough "consequences?"

I am going to have a hard time waiting until this thread runs its course.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
118. What crap.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:36 PM
Mar 2016

It was a re-posted article. He didn't even write it himself, though he did highlight what he thought was important.

If it wasn't so sad for millions of minorities, I'd almost laugh at the transparency of the trolls on DU who've done their best from day one to paint Sanders and his mean, bad supporters as racist, sexist boogeymen. A man who's worked all his life for equality and to improve the lives of those millions hurting as the result of REAL racism and bigotry, against the profit-prison industry that dis-proportionally targets PoC and leaves families devastated, convicted persons lives ruined - often unable to ever vote again, get decent employment, etc. Clinton has made good money from lobbyists for this industry, and still is.

The 'tough on crime' bill her husband put into place and that she championed with her 'super-predators' - we've got to 'bring them to heel' bullshit.

The welfare reform act her husband worked out so that so many black mothers were forced to work in starvation wage paying jobs, unable to afford child-care, transportation and suffered greatly.

The 'war on drugs' that also disproportionately targets PoC, LE racial profiling and brutality - some here don't give one shit about Sanders positions to address these in a real way. Transparent as fuck.

As someone who was abused horribly for many years, I totally understand 'Stockholm Syndrome'. It doesn't just apply to abused women - it is a very REAL issue that affects many who CHOOSE to stay with someone who's actions have ruined or harmed their lives so much. If people can't take the fucking truth, they shouldn't be posting on a message board.

WillyT was just one of a long line of progressive voices that spoke too much truth. That the Admins used this to ban him was an excuse, and a bad one. Many PoC have since pointed out what a bad joke this has all become. They aren't a stupid, helpless group that needs to be protected from scary words - no matter how dishonestly they're used by those of a sad little group of posters on a message group that need the progressives here gone.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
121. He should have let it die,
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:42 PM
Mar 2016
Even if he was right - he should have left it alone. (He wasn't right but even if he was, so what?) There was no win to be had.

There are times to willingly lose battles in order to win the war. He miscalculated, that's all. We've all done it.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
126. Why?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:51 PM
Mar 2016

I call people who send others to war warmongers all the time - I state they don't care about human life and if they try to give themselves crazy credentials like feminist, or leader of women worldwide or some such shit I get told I'm wrong and have had many, many posts hidden for it. Should I stop though? No, he didn't miscalculate at all. And again, if people can't handle truth they shouldn't be posting on message boards. People question why battered women stay with their mates all the time - should they stop asking? I don't think so. It's a legitimate question, and a proven phenomenon that affects many groups of people. It's no more racist used here than it is asking it about any other group. But, some have this desperate need for every second post involving black people seen as racist, no matter what the intention. It's been a ploy from the beginning.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
97. Okay. I'm tryin' here
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:55 PM
Mar 2016

Do you know what I hear when you say, "you don't know what it means?"

I hear a version of this:

"Nigger isn't racist because it means lazy person." Or whatever it supposedly means now, it keeps changing so much that I lose track.

Just stop digging. Leave it alone.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
101. I'm not
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:04 PM
Mar 2016

I'm stating the truth. He blew it and I'm sorry for him, he made an irreversible mistake. I will still miss his contribution here.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
133. They weren't racist comments in that article he posted
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:32 PM
Mar 2016

any more than it is sexist to assume that many women stay in bad relationships d/t Stockholm Syndrome.

There's a reason these phenomenons are studied, and it's not to do harm to the person or people they're wondering if they might apply to.

Response to Rebkeh (Reply #3)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
89. Really? Well, I respect your right to attempt a positive thread about a departed Sanders supporter
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:28 PM
Mar 2016

in the Sanders group.

No one has to post anything at all on an appreciation thread in the Sanders Group. If they feel they must, they should keep it neutral or positive. They can express negative sentiments elsewhere. There were certainly enough of those in other forums, and what is to be gained by it anyway? Yet another kick at someone who got banned and can't defend himself? This thread is not the place for that. JMO.

Response to merrily (Reply #89)

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
50. Fair enough .
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:04 AM
Mar 2016

I hope they begin to apply that logic on all sides and remove those race baiters on the other side , but we all know that won't happen as certain racists are tolerable apparently .

Response to Rebkeh (Reply #3)

Baitball Blogger

(46,753 posts)
6. Can someone PM a copy of the offending Willy post?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

I have read Hillary supporters gleefully claiming that they are going to love what is going to happen to Bernie supporters if Hillary wins. Certainly tells me that they would be happy if we were to leave the Dem party. I just have a bad feeling about what's going on here on DU. Maybe, if I read the offending Willy post I can make up my own mind.

Never mind. I found it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280151092

 

Ivan Kaputski

(528 posts)
7. Joining the list: Manny L0oniX NY_SKP ...more to come. Visit them over on JPR.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:40 PM
Mar 2016

BTW unity is highly over rated. Don't expect it on DU this time!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
11. When L0oniX was banned, I knew it was Manny next, the same when he was banned
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:48 PM
Mar 2016

I knew it'd be WillyT. I believe I know who is next. Who do you think?

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
16. The way I see it, there is no debating issues with the other side. They won't debate.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:54 PM
Mar 2016

They ridicule, etc. So the only reason to stay is to discuss issues among ourselves and put the bullies on ignore.

Response to Bubzer (Reply #28)

merrily

(45,251 posts)
92. Did you tell the posters involved what you suspected was going to happen to them? If not, why not?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 03:44 PM
Mar 2016

You don't need to reply. The questions are rhetorical, maybe food for thought.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. Willie T was the best.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

Boy! Hilary must be scared of California, Washington and Oregon because her storm troopers sure are cracking down on Bernie supporters on DU.



This is no underground. This place is a bought and sold Hillary haven dedicated to preserving the status quo.

Those of us who prefer Bernie have good reasons for it: The Issues.

Hillary is not as strong as Bernie on any issue.

Her claim to be more experienced is sheer bologna. The only thing she is more experienced at is standing beside Bill Clinton at ceremonies.

I strongly believe that the evidence will ultimately show that Hillary is in great part responsible for the terrible mess in Libya and Syria.


I repeat that I will vote for all other Democrats on my ballot but I will never vote for Hillary.

California does not vote until June 7. This campaign is not over until then. And even after that, at 72 I will assure you, anything can happen. Hillary is not a queen.

She may own the owners of this website, but she does not own California, and I think she knows it.

 

Ivan Kaputski

(528 posts)
20. It's pathetic if they think what they do here will have any real affect.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary doesn't need their money.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
23. Cheers to Willy T.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016

A great DU'er who brought more to this site for so many years than all the baiter/haters put together.

smiley

(1,432 posts)
24. Just 1 more reason to visit JPR more often...
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

Willy may have gone overboard a few times, but I'll take his posts any day over the vile posts by many of the pardoned HRC supporters.

DU is going downhill real quick.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
25. After a few days . . .
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:25 PM
Mar 2016

. . . he should apologize and be reinstated. Anything else is unfair, given what some Camp Weathervane members get away with.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
34. Trust me that doesn't work even if he wanted to and I doubt that. They use
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:54 PM
Mar 2016

racism as a hammer to bludgeon progressives. Which is ironic. The whole thing is ironic. Sanders is less of a racist than Clinton.
Here is what Black Lives Matter said about Clinton:


“Here's the truth: the Clinton legacy has left our prisons bursting at the seams. Real lives have been destroyed as a result. It is an indisputable fact that millions of Black people were locked up for drug crimes and provided the bodies for the expansion of the prison industry.

The 1994 Crime Bill that she so vigorously defended not only expanded incarceration, but stripped funding for college education from prisoners. The Clinton legacy allowed for policies that prevented anyone convicted of a felony drug offense from receiving food stamps or income assistance. Clinton-led welfare reform fundamentally ripped apart the social safety net.”


“Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton's efforts to push these policies resulted in the continued destruction of Black communities and the swift growth of our mass incarceration crisis.”


Clinton is not a friend of the AA community.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
40. Agreed
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:13 PM
Mar 2016

Clintons are no friends of the AA community and they use "racism" to hammer progressives and stifle class conflict.

But it is dead wrong to say African-Americans who support Clinton are suffering from the Stockholm Syndrome or are like battered wives. African-Americans have heard white promises before, from the early days of slavery to reconstruction and beyond. Those promises have more often than not been found wanting and have often proven lethal. So better the Devil you know is not a stupid policy . . . it's a cautious one, borne from history.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
41. It is an opinion in an attempt to explain why the AA community would chose the
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:17 PM
Mar 2016

candidate that has been disastrous to their community. It's a serious discussion that we can't have here because this isn't a "politically liberal" message board as advertised, if you don't say the Politically Correct thing, those that disagree can yell "racism" and if enough of them form a mob, they can get you banned.

H. Clinton and her Prisons For Profits will continue to fill our prisons with minorities. So why would they support her?

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
45. Like I said
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 04:17 PM
Mar 2016

The devil you know.

Plus, connections in the community mean a lot. More than in most communities, especially in the South.

Finally, there is money involved.

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
26. I find it appalling that a certain member
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:29 PM
Mar 2016

took it upon herself to ridicule WillyT is a separate thread. That same instigator was once timed out and she should at least show some understanding for having been there before herself. Ignorant people continue to amaze me.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
35. I'm not surprised at all. She's been hating on Jewish people for some time now.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:54 PM
Mar 2016

This is just another excuse to do so. And to get more attention too.

choie

(4,111 posts)
54. I don't know whether to cry or whether to throw something
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:28 AM
Mar 2016

that poster, along with others in her circle, is vile. My mouth dropped when I read what she said about Jews. I have been a member of DU for 12 years and I've never seen the type of venom being spewed by those Clinton supporters. I am insulted at the accusations of racism being thrown at Bernie and his supporters (us) with no repercussions (i.e. banning) I know I should put them on ignore, but I'd rather be aware of what they are saying. However, it really depresses me that DU has become what it has become. It used to be a haven for us progressives, but now it's a forum for bullies.

white_wolf

(6,238 posts)
62. You think that's bad?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 06:08 AM
Mar 2016

Someone linked to fucking Stormfront and tried to imply Sanders, whose family was killed by the Nazis, was supported by neo-Nazi.

Response to floriduck (Reply #26)

Response to Post removed (Reply #56)

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
64. Someone not too BRAVE iN mAKing inflammatory posts?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:58 AM
Mar 2016

How cAn Such SopHOmoric LosErs still be posting here?

Skinner's amnesty was such a transparent ploy to get the most egregious Hillary fanatics back on the attack. Nothing like changing the rules as you go along to boost your side.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
36. I love WillyT,
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 01:56 PM
Mar 2016

and I'm very sorry to see that this happened. I was worried for him last night and truly wish he hadn't doubled down on that particular line of discussion.

Meanwhile, I noticed that a particular HRC supporter has had 11 hides in 90 days. I'm not sure the ban hammer is equitably applied, but I'm not in charge.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
43. We have lost the only power we had via the jury system. I am surprised that we even have alerts
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:20 PM
Mar 2016

now that war has been declared.

Response to rhett o rick (Reply #43)

 

melman

(7,681 posts)
75. Who do you think you're kidding?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 02:18 PM
Mar 2016

Everyone knows who really does the bullying and alert swarming/stalking.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
78. You are right.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 02:26 PM
Mar 2016

I did not get....

That I was in the Sanders group. I apologize. I will no longer post in this thread, respectfully.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
130. An apology for posting in the wrong group, but not for what you said, eh?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:06 PM
Mar 2016
Probably best to apologize to the person whose post you replied to.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
139. Yes, I saw it.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 08:05 PM
Mar 2016

I've known she's been playing a nasty game since the beginning; trying to make every decent thing anyone tried to say about Bernie Sanders wanting to help all people - including people of colour, and fighting for them all his life into something ugly and racist. Turns out ......... the accuser is the one full of hate and really has been playing everyone. It's sick. But par for the whole campaign against him, imo.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
79. I said at least we had a recourse to keep the bullies at bay. Now we don't even have that.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 02:29 PM
Mar 2016

And what level playing field? It's never been level. Sanders supporters have never had a proportional representation in MIRT or the Host Forum. Not one of the Clinton bullies has ever been PPR'd. 80% of the alerts here are from a small handful of Clinton supporters.

How do you justify supporting the Wealthy while ignoring the struggling among us.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
83. Since Skinner did what he did, which is fine this is his business after all, this is our only
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 02:58 PM
Mar 2016

sanctuary on here and just barely at that as they can still read the group and alert to send to jury.

Also People please try to post more in LBN and VM as those posts can make the Front page while OPs posted in

here and GDP will NOT go to front page.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
108. evidently not. maybe this is her first time posting in here but, could one of the hosts please block
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:19 PM
Mar 2016

her. Also there was a HRC disruptor in here yesterday that needs blocking. Will provide link if needed. Thanks.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
111. Did you alert or pm a host? They can't read every post in the group and some of them host
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:22 PM
Mar 2016

more than just this group. If you don't know how to alert a host, the instructions are in one of the pinned posts.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
119. no. I did not alert. Sorry. Should I alert on this one? or if you will take care and alert on this
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:38 PM
Mar 2016

one I will go back and alert on the one from yesterday. Thanks.

PS: I was not so vigilant before but, since all that has happened this week I am not in a tolerant mood any more.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
120. If you want to alert on this, go ahead. if the one from yesterday is the same poster, you can
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:41 PM
Mar 2016

mention that in the alert. Blocking is the only power the hosts have and they can't block a poster more than once.

Hiraeth

(4,805 posts)
122. I am sorry. The only alert I see will send it to jury. I don't understand how to send it to hosts of
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:43 PM
Mar 2016

this group. If you don't think she needs to be blocked I will just put her on the other one on ignore. I found the other post btw.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
100. Well, can't an account still get "reviewed" for a time or, as in some cases, eternally?
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:03 PM
Mar 2016

Can't people still get banned? They may not get involuntary vacations during the primary, but the admins have not given up their other powers, as best I can tell.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
106. It appears to me that the Admins took control and obviously they are letting some
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:14 PM
Mar 2016

have immunity. It's their site.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
109. I was making a different point. IOW, just because some appear to have carte blanche
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:20 PM
Mar 2016

to say whatever they feel like saying, others may get PPRd if they try to follow suit.

I never question the right of a board owner to do whatever he wants with the board.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
113. I did miss your point. I agree that while some are free to say whatever they want, others might be
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:25 PM
Mar 2016

banned for similar behavior. I agree they can do whatever they want. I know first hand.

mahina

(17,687 posts)
38. Cheers Willy T, you were a good DU buddy.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

You are missed.

Stockholm syndrome stuff, I don't agree either way, but Willy T was a great DUer. We had some good exchanges and I appreciated his (or her) along the way.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
39. I had my say in the GD announcement thread and did what I usually do
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 02:08 PM
Mar 2016

which is post a protest in hostile territory and get my fair share of abuse from members of a truly ugly, hateful group -- instead of running to a friendly group like this one. Although they seem somewhat more muted this time.

I don't know why I want to stand in enemy territory and tell 'em off. Smart people never do that.

When L0oniX was banned, I was inflamed at the injustice and posted a protest in GD-P, giving a somewhat stalkerish Hill supporter an excuse to form an alert party 12 hours later in the wee hours of the morning to get me a hide, followed by a triumphant little PM from the stalkerish alerter.

Only later did I realize there was a nice L0oniX remembrance thread here.

When Manny was banned, I stayed for days in the thread from which he was banned, protesting the unfairness, and got first-hand experience with some of the dirtiest ones out there.

Only later did I realize there had been a long, warm, Manny thread here.

My instincts appear to be foolish and self-destructive.

I wrote my honest thoughts on Willy there: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7694408

Willy is such a nice person -- not one malicious, hateful bone in his body. A good soul. Whereas the grave dancers are, and always have been, loaded with scowling hatefulness, intent to do harm. I don't know why Hillary attracts such people, but she does. And it speaks volumes about her, as well.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
107. Several Sanders supporters could not bring themselves to either stay the fuck off
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 04:18 PM
Mar 2016

this thread out of respect to Bubzer, if not also WillyT, or stay positive or neutral.

I hate pot shots at banned posters (other than "name removed&quot . I think they are cowardly and gratuitous.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
46. I know Willy asked for it, but considering the Doom and Gloom squad back and empowered
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:30 PM
Mar 2016

It looks more slanted than ever.

Cheers to Willy on all his positive contributions here. I'm sure we'll see the lights get snuffed out one by one now.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
47. Damn this is a tough blow
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:35 PM
Mar 2016

I will miss WillyT and the accusations of racism don't ring true.

Sorry to see you go, WillyT. I enjoyed all your posts and your outspoken support of Bernie.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
48. This is a real low blow.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 11:17 PM
Mar 2016

He was indeed a great contributor.

The accusations of some vile haters is just sickening.

This place will not be the same.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
58. He was not a Bernie Supporter.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 01:18 AM
Mar 2016

I've read a lot of posts on this board. For most posters, sooner or later posts are made which reveal that someone does not support the candidate they profess to support. This occurred one night with Willie T. But hey, it helps support the false meme that Bernie supporters are racist.

There are a lot of manipulative political games that are played. But I think this is definitely one of the lowest.

Divide and conquer. It is how they keep control.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
128. No. I don't remember the exact post. It was after Iowa or NH I believe.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:01 PM
Mar 2016

A lot of talking was going on and it became obvious that he was not a Bernie supporter. There are plenty of phony Bernie supporters on this board.


Response to Skwmom (Reply #128)

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
60. thank you for pointing to the truth
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 02:56 AM
Mar 2016

as the truth teller in my personal circle, being banned and shunned is a price one learns to willingly pay - not that it always has to be told - but more often than not, honesty is the best policy.

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
61. All the good ones are being tossed out
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:51 AM
Mar 2016

I hope that he now posts on jackpineradicals.org!

God, I am going to miss him!

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
63. he spoke the truth, which is why they wanted him out.
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:26 AM
Mar 2016

no dissent allowed in the queens court, ya know

yeah, this post will probably be hidden. i don't care. i am at jpr now, made an exception to say thanks to willyt!

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
71. he made a lot of good contributions to this place
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

and I enjoyed reading most of his stuff. See you later, Willy!

noretreatnosurrender

(1,890 posts)
132. Miss Seeing You Here WillieT
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:17 PM
Mar 2016

I liked a lot of WillieT's posts and I will miss seeing so many good links he provided here at DU.

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
135. Never seen a tombstone with the name spelled wrong
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 05:46 PM
Mar 2016

never seen someone another by the wrong name either

Howler

(4,225 posts)
141. Nnnnnoooooooooooooooo!
Sat Mar 19, 2016, 09:07 PM
Mar 2016

I loved me some Willy T. I saw some awful things said about him in the gdp section. This reeks. I will miss him.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
144. The concept "stalkholm syndrome" has been made taboo,
Sun Mar 20, 2016, 01:54 AM
Mar 2016

As being disallowed to describe Hillary Rodham Clinton's divisionary politics.

Over at Kos a trigger word is "neocon". It won't be allowed to describe Kagan as a "neocon".
OK, you've got that, right? Now try to describe Hillary Clinton's foreign policy, her advisers, the people she has professed to admire the most.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»WillieT Appreciation thre...