Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bubzer

(4,211 posts)
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:43 AM Mar 2016

Fraud "investigation" against Jane Sanders

Toensing is representing a group of Catholic parishioners. He alleges Jane Sanders cost the Diocese between $1.6 and $2 million dollars in 2010 and 2011. He says she misrepresented the amount of money Burlington college could raise to support a land purchase from the Catholic Church. A loan from People's United Bank was contingent upon Sanders and the college coming up with more than $2 million dollars. "The bank understood it as confirmed donations," Toensing said.

"So a financial institution would go ahead and ascertain how firm those pledges are. It would do it's due diligence," said Craig Nolan, a former U.S. Attorney. Nolan says investigating the alleged fraud would require getting an explanation from the college as to why the donations never came through. "The first thing I do is call the FBI and I talk to the FBI about their thoughts. Probably schedule an interview with the financial institution," he said.

In a statement, a spokesman for Senator Bernie Sanders called this nothing more than mud slinging in a presidential election year. "This recycled, discredited garbage is the handiwork of Brady Toensing, the Vice Chairman of the Vermont Republican Party. These kinds of attacks on family members of candidates are one of the reasons why the American people are so disgusted with politics in America today," the statement said.

Amid controversy, Jane Sanders resigned as the school's president in 2011, and the school has a largely new board of trustees. "From the board's perspective, this is an incident that occurred in the past that we have no knowledge of personally on the board, and we view it, frankly, as a distraction from our mission right now which is to continue the forward movement of the college," said Yves Bradley, Chair of the college's board of trustees.

http://www.wcax.com/story/30935632/group-calls-for-fraud-investigation-into-jane-sanders-land-deals

A few things worth noting:

The College is treating it as a non-incident. If there was any substance to this, why are they acting as though its a non-issue?

Toensing (vice-chairman of the Vermont Republican Party) put in a request to the FBI to investigate Jane Sanders... to date, Toensing's request has been met with silence.

In short, unless the FBI gets involved, this can largely be dismissed as a non-issue, and a partisan attempt to discredit the Sanders name.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fraud "investigation" against Jane Sanders (Original Post) Bubzer Mar 2016 OP
I'm sure propaganda outlets will be harping it pretty soon though revbones Mar 2016 #1
This is from January. Punkingal Mar 2016 #2
I saw mention of this LiberalElite Mar 2016 #3
It was brought back up recently. Bubzer Mar 2016 #4
They would love the FBI to get after Jane. Punkingal Mar 2016 #5
Was Jane Sanders to profit from it? If she was not setting the deal up to profit from the deal LiberalArkie Mar 2016 #6
You Give People Too Much Credit PCPrincess Mar 2016 #7
Expect everything and anything to be thrown in the next month... mak3cats Mar 2016 #8
 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
1. I'm sure propaganda outlets will be harping it pretty soon though
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:49 AM
Mar 2016

We can look forward to new breaking headlines from propaganda outlets such as Blue Nation Review owned by Hillary super-PAC Correct the Record which is ran by admitted liar and previous right-wing hatchet man David Brock who slimed the Clintons until they hired him... or BNR's propagandist Peter Daou

Other outlets such as The Daily Beast, where Chelsea Clinton is on the board, or DailyNewsBin - all of which are propaganda sites for Clinton now.

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
6. Was Jane Sanders to profit from it? If she was not setting the deal up to profit from the deal
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:34 PM
Mar 2016

then the FBI is going to laugh in their faces. Was Sanders moving the money through a foundation she was part of?

The college wanted to buy the property. The diocese and Sanders agreed to a price, if the school could raise it. The school could not.
Deal fell trough.

PCPrincess

(68 posts)
7. You Give People Too Much Credit
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

By bringing it up in order to dismiss it as a non-issue, you would need to assume that all possible readers are able to ascertain fact from fiction and able to logically dissect information without emotional involvement.

We know this is not possible for a majority of American voters. I'd just leave it alone.

mak3cats

(1,573 posts)
8. Expect everything and anything to be thrown in the next month...
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 01:28 PM
Mar 2016

Most of them have been thrown before, and a lot of them more than once. Flop sweat redux.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Fraud "investigation" aga...