Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostnfound

(16,179 posts)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:33 AM Apr 2016

Hypothetical scenario about voter registration databases

Suppose that one candidate was aware that the entire voter registration database had been compromised or polluted's or hacked, in such a way that large numbers of voters had their registration records altered.

In Florida, for example, this was known to of happened due to motor voter laws. If you had changed your address gotten a new driver license, it would update your voter registration record, but it also overwrote your party affiliation information.

In New York, with large numbers of people voting outside of their district the day after Hurricane Sandy, it seems plausible that many voter registration records were mixed up.

So if ONE candidate knew this, very early on, and arranged to have a GEMS database and an app to do large-scale updates to that registration database, with instructions to only fix the registration records of those contacted as leaning towards that particular candidate, it would not exactly be a crime, would it? In fact, if that candidate simply concentrated their resources time and energy on such registration crew error correction, they could probably obtain a significant advantage, if the database initially was actually riddled with errors.

It is not necessary to believe that one candidate maliciously and intentionally corrupted the records of supporters predominantly belonging to the other candidate. Simply remaining quiet about large scale errors, while nonetheless working to correct them, would be huge advantage. Easy to rationalize... Couldn't you call it a superior ground game?

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hypothetical scenario about voter registration databases (Original Post) lostnfound Apr 2016 OP
DATAGATE continued: can the dnc voter software change state election commision voter databases? 4ricksren Apr 2016 #1
 

4ricksren

(72 posts)
1. DATAGATE continued: can the dnc voter software change state election commision voter databases?
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:07 AM
Apr 2016

do the state or local election departments receive voter database changes from the dnc and rnc?

or are the governmental voter databases separate from the dnc and rnc voter databases, i.e., can the Parties doctor the databases that are eventually used at the polling places to turn voters away?

if there is election fraud, must the hacking be a result of the election commisions, or can it come from altered party databases?

and what about data collusion between employees of the election commision, with data-specialists from the dnc and rnc voter database departments?

I.e.: are the voter database irregularities in more and more states, e.g., AZ, NY (60,OOO voters in brooklyn alone), CA (people checking and finding out they are no longer registered, and ineligible), etc. -- are these irregularities generated by the election comissions, or by the Parties'?

who votes matters less than who COUNTS the votes
-- joseph stalin

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Hypothetical scenario abo...