And...I'm looking at that name of his atty. Is that person related to Susan MacDougall, I wonder?

family stay off small planes.

Although we all wish for a speedy resolution, I think it's more important for the FBI to do a thorough and politically impartial investigation.

the keys to the oval office.

...I suspect it would be to clear her, not to get an indictment. That they're taking their time indicates to me they have a decent case, and are dotting the i's and crossing the t's. IMO, the FBI will reccomend an indictment of Clinton and/or top aides. I do not know if Lynch will follow up on that reccomendation. If she avoids legal prosecution, I am certain the GOP will still move towards impeachment if she's elected.

The 5th Amendment against self-incrimination no longer applies after a grant of immunity.
He MUST answer a subpoena, and MUST testify, or face indeterminate jail time for contempt
UNTIL he does testify.

...or at least that is the way I understand WHY immunity is ever granted. It forces testimony.

Those are the terms used in the article. There's no indication that the committee has issued a subpoena, which, per your post, would be the necessary predicate to a contempt citation.

The committee may have shied away from issuing a subpoena for fear of being accused of interfering with the DoJ investigation. Alternatively, the committee may have thought that Pagliano's appearance would be more productive in the more relaxed atmosphere of a more or less voluntary appearance. On that view, now that he's declined the request, a subpoena may be forthcoming forthwith.

That doesn't make any sense at all unless he is called to testify.

According to the linked article, it was the Department of Justice that offered immunity, not the Congressional committee.

A committee is generally looking for public testimony. The DoJ, on the other hand, will want to start by privately interviewing an immunized witness, although there may be testimony down the road.

Your replies make sense.
Though it DOES seem that something more is in-the-works with the grant of immunity.

I was thinking Warren should stay in the Senate. But if this isn't resolved before the proper time, a realistic replacement might be desired.

Now I'm just confused.

He needs to indict Clinton, Pagiliano (immunity revoked since he won't cooperate), Bluementhal and Abedin.

of the Clintons than of any old Senate committee.

What else could it be? They paid him off.

the way this is going down is so similar to mafia cases

publicly in front of cameras. He is afraid of the queen's wrath.

the SOS. Now he is caught up in this legal nitemare.

It sounds like he's worked for Clinton's for a while. State Dept people said they never saw him...sounds like he was collecting a govt paycheck while doing private work for Clinton.

until the FBI and DOJ are done with him.

Him and Pataki are probably drinking champagne every night before they go to bed.

"Investigation"?

I thought...oh nevermind.

Can't say as I blame him. And he should be careful.