Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:09 AM May 2016

“Maj. Brezler violated regulations by maintaining classified information on a personal laptop comput

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is not alone in being sloppy with classified information on her computer during the war on terrorism.

The Marine Corps was too.

A Marine officer fighting dismissal for mishandling classified material on his computer has filed a complaint in federal court. He charges that Marine generals unfairly singled him out, citing statistics that show Marines often wrongly stored classified information and went unpunished.

Marine Reserve Maj. Jason Brezler’s lawsuit does not mention Mrs. Clinton, whose handling of secrets on her private server as secretary of state is under FBI investigation.

But legal observers say that if the military can impose harsh punishment on a war veteran for keeping secrets in the wrong computer, then the FBI, in fairness, should cast a critical eye on Mrs. Clinton and her stash of information that the intelligence community says contained top-secret data.

“Brezler was treated in an entirely disproportionate way,” his Manhattan attorney, Michael J. Bowe, says in an April 25 complaint that aims to persuade a judge to overturn a Marine Corps decision to oust him.

Charles Gittins, a former Marine and criminal defense attorney, said Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling “was a far more egregious violation of law.”


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/1/hillary-clinton-emails-far-more-egregious-than-dat/

I think this story has legs also comparative analytical implications

Maj. Brezler is the officer who, while a graduate student in Oklahoma, sent a warning email via his laptop to intelligence officers in Afghanistan in 2012. He messaged that Sarwar Jan, a corrupt Afghan police chief, should not be allowed to stay on Forward Operating Base Delhi. Jan smuggled arms to the Taliban and sexually abused boys, Maj. Brezler’s dispatched dossier said.

Maj. Brezler had played a role in kicking Jan off another U.S. base while deployed in-country.

His warning went unheeded. Two weeks later, one of Jan’s “tea boys” walked into the base gym and fatally shot three Marines in cold blood. The killer proclaimed he was carrying out jihad.

For Maj. Brezler, that email may prove his downfall. An intelligence officer in Afghanistan reported him to higher-ups for sending classified information over his personal laptop. A Navy criminal investigation found he had other classified documents stored there.

Go for it in GDP if you want ....... it show a two tier hypocrisy that exists.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
“Maj. Brezler violated regulations by maintaining classified information on a personal laptop comput (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter May 2016 OP
Here's a question EdwardBernays May 2016 #1
If you have a clearance you have to report it. noamnety May 2016 #2
I ask because EdwardBernays May 2016 #3
It's one of the BIG issues. IdaBriggs May 2016 #4
Thanks! EdwardBernays May 2016 #5

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
1. Here's a question
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:30 AM
May 2016

If someone sends me classified data, to my private email, and I know they shouldn't have access to it, and I don't report it, is that ok?

Or do I have an obligation to report it legally?

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
2. If you have a clearance you have to report it.
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

Just the fact that it's now in your private email requires a report, whether or not the sender should have had access to it.

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
3. I ask because
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:58 AM
May 2016

Sydney Blumenthal had no security clearance, which she knew quite well, and yet he was sending her classified information.

Was she reporting this to anyone?

Seems like a pretty serious breach to not report it. I mean God knows who else he was emailing state secrets to.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
4. It's one of the BIG issues.
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:11 AM
May 2016

This post really nails it down and scares me six ways to Sunday (quoting from the Timeline)

Timeline: http://thompsontimeline.com/IS_CLINTON%27S_EMAIL_SCANDAL_FOR_REAL%3F

From the huge discussion thread ---

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1888473

Here are two little facts inside that timeline that come together in a single sentence that I think really do look very bad for Clinton.

Clinton Foundation employed Blumenthal to pump leaks from the CIA through his fake job at the Clinton Foundation to the Secretary of State. In short the Clintons conspired to organize and finance a spying operation on the CIA using the Clinton Foundation as a front.


SPYING ON THE CIA -- and

EdwardBernays

(3,343 posts)
5. Thanks!
Tue May 3, 2016, 10:38 AM
May 2016

First I've seen it stated like that... It only just occurred to me this morning that she's probably legally responsible for not telling someone Blumenthal was sending around state secrets via very unsecured email.

How he has been arrested is beyond me.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»“Maj. Brezler violated re...