back in the 19th Century. It's because he was a Jew. The same fukn' mindset applies here.

Admittedly, I am not in the loop enough to follow this thread very well, so the subtle references look odd. Just explaining how others might see the up thread post.

We were talking about..... naming un-Bernie people... but in a round about manner.

That is what guillaumeb were doing... You have to put your..humorous.. thinking cap on to get it.

It's fine

back when it was obvious the wheels fell off..thus leading inevitably to this contested convention.

that having David Brock on one's campaign would necessarily indicate that one is not interested in dealing in fairness, in decency or in honesty? And wouldn't that necessarily mean that one is a flawed candidate on a very basic level?

That's the way my thought processes work, anyway, and it would fill me with self-loathing to advocate for such a candidate. I encourage input, as I'm truly interested in improving my thought processes, especially as they pertain to ethical behavior.

I know on Reddit users can buy aged accounts. No idea if that kind of thing happens on other sites??

At any rate, the subtle posters are along the vein of "even if he doesn't win he has changed things blah blah blah" - they are going for making you feel good so you sigh and say "oh well" and vote for Hillary. At which time nothing will change except her position on any given day.

Stay strong, Berners.

ignore list. automatic. no 2nd chances. it is a form of admonishment with a lecture. suddenly, hillary's finger wagging and fist shaking appear before my eyes.

but I've been around the block a time or two.