Bernie Sanders

Bernie93

(423 posts) Tue May 24, 2016, 05:11 AM May 2016

Joe : Bernie Sanders Will Forever Change US Politics | Morning Joe

[link:

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Joe : Bernie Sanders Will Forever Change US Politics | Morning Joe (Original Post) Bernie93 May 2016 OP

Bernie has already changed U.S. politics profoundly. merrily May 2016 #1

Bless you Bernie. Don't just like you, LOVE YOU! Go California. highprincipleswork May 2016 #2

I'm totally with Bernie! Independent_Liberal May 2016 #3

I wonder if they'll ever come to the conclusion findrskeep May 2016 #4

K&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #5

That's why he needs to be elected as President Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #6

merrily

(45,251 posts)

1. Bernie has already changed U.S. politics profoundly.

Reply to Bernie93 (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 06:43 AM

May 2016

Sea changes in US politics, thanks to Senator Sanders and his supporters

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280109865

And there's lots more to come.

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)

2. Bless you Bernie. Don't just like you, LOVE YOU! Go California.

Reply to Bernie93 (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 01:44 PM

May 2016

Independent_Liberal

(4,108 posts)

3. I'm totally with Bernie!

Reply to Bernie93 (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 03:51 PM

May 2016

I'm glad I had the opportunity to vote for him in the primaries, and I hope I can vote for him again in the election.

findrskeep

(713 posts)

4. I wonder if they'll ever come to the conclusion

Reply to Bernie93 (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 04:29 PM

May 2016

that the reason she doesn't seem to have a message is because that message frequently changes, depending on who she's speaking to

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)

5. K&R nt

Reply to Bernie93 (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 07:34 PM

May 2016

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)

6. That's why he needs to be elected as President

Reply to Bernie93 (Original post)

Tue May 24, 2016, 09:57 PM

May 2016

and many others down ticket

Reply to this discussion