...I had the horrific thought of what a terror warning would do to the election. She is desperately going to need to grab the news cycle. I recall that many people felt that the airliner that went down in Queens on the day that very bad news of the election 2000 study were due out was assigned to Karl Rove. I have seen others mention that a terror warning would help Trump. But if it could be engineered to help Hillary.......


Ugh.

Manipulated by the PTB so I would expect that factor added to my scenario depending who they want to through their weight behind. So yes, expect something else to stir up the masses or distract them.

something really sensational

I suppose. As for terror, who knows? But I have had similar thought.

Last edited Wed May 25, 2016, 08:52 AM - Edit history (1)

Very different effect if the report comes out early in the week. Interesting point being made here.

I've been mulling over this question, as well.

Within the confines of the Trump campaign, Hillary campaign, Democratic Party heads, Republican Party heads and the Sanders campaign. It would be totally delusional if they didn't.

Yes the timing of the release of the report early in the week is important in the short run for the primaries

but in the long run it will impact this election until the final vote is cast in November if she is our nominee including house and senate seats.

Who have placed their bets and invested , resources and reputations to get her in power.

They will of course have to defend her and even convince her to stay in the fight and her ego and pride will agree. Unless the party elders think otherwise and see the coming disaster like I do and convince her to step down for the sake of the party it will be like a snowball growing down mountain until it reaches an avalanche of Senate and House hearings since the repugs control both houses. National Security is a hot button issue for the US consciousness especially after 911.

I followed the Watergate saga from the beginning before it went national and this affair has a lot of the same smell. Nixon won that election even though Watergate happened way before that election.

Maybe the system now is so corrupt now that nothing will happen but I don't think so............Something will happen and it won't be good
.





The truth is stranger than fiction
Fiction has to make sense.

for real change. He blows me away with his vigor and vision.



And he might and will be a bigger player in this total affair than even he can't conceive.

Time will tell all the way to the convention and even after the election no matter how it comes down.

It will be a bumpy wild ride so fasten your seat belts

the election.

My guess is that, regardless of the facts, the House Republican will start holding hearing, perhaps impeachment hearings, as soon as she is elected (if she is) in order to create the following narrative:

1) She broke various laws and protocols with her email and phone communications that show she can't handle classified communications needed to maintain national security.

2) Her server was hacked.

3) Her hacked emails were the source of information that was used by terrorists to their advantage. There is already an account circulating saying that this seems have been the source of information that a terrorist group used to avoid capture in the Philipines.

4) Hacked information is how terrorists found out that Benghazi was the site of a CIA "rat line" smuggling arms to Syria. I have been expecting this allegation to start circulating any day, given the Republican fetish for Benghazi.

And this all may be true. But even if it is not, it shows that she was willing to take these risks to protect her political career, which she felt was more important than national security interests.

and she is worse now with her Romanian hacker and all the rest. Without even getting into her husband's issues (which I only bring up because she says he will have a substantive role of fixing the economy should she somehow be elected).

I'd really like to know who sold us out here. Was it the DNC - is Wasserman Schultz really in it for the republicans?

I adore Bernie and will support him as long as he's running - but I'm still amazed that the party couldn't come up with someone new to run rather than dredge up all this stuff. This election is a mess.

He had enormous influence on the direction of the party and never forget his roaring speeches on the senate floor and even his endorsement of Barack Obama. He helped keep the party in check and he was Obama's mentor and kept him from straying from the path.

I think Obama's presidency would have been much different if Kennedy had lived.




After he died
He left a huge vacuum that the third way and the dark forces took advantage of.

I was thinking that the other day

Bernie won't drop out. Read the rest of my thread because it needs to play out. I just hope it comes out before California but none the less
it will be a wild card in this election.

look at the shitstorm that broke out when that news hit
and this isn't even the FBI report.

Check out a google search ........ clinton state department review.
70 million results.......... then check to see if international news agencies are covering this too.......they are



Yeah the Sanders campaign rocks

"When this 'story or report' breaks, what do you think all the TV news cycle will do?"

Monday is a national holiday - will it be a slow news day? Then we've got all the Republican talk shows on Sunday. Hmmmm - I say again, Hmmmm.

K&R - Great post.