Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 08:55 PM May 2016

Glad I saved this during the purge...

Paul Thompson wrote this over in GD: P and the Hilliterates voted it off the island. Dick Morris aside, this contains some great information to follow up on:

NOTE: This thread is not for Clinton naysayers. This is for people who take Clinton's email scandal seriously and are trying to use the collective intelligence of many DUers to uncover more information.

---

Here's an important bit from the State Department inspector general report. The first person mentioned is Justin Cooper. The second, the Senior Advisor, is Bryan Pagliano:

OIG identified two individuals who provided technical support to Secretary Clinton . The first, who was at one time an advisor to former President Clinton but was never a Department employee, registered the clintonemail.com domain name on January 13, 2009. The second, a Schedule C political appointee who worked in IRM as a Senior Advisor from May 2009 through February 2013...
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2842460/ESP-16-03-Final.pdf (US Department of State, 5/25/2016)]


http://www.dickmorris.com/bill-clintons-personal-aide-no-security-clearance-operated-hillarys-email-server/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/27/monica-crowley-the-linchpin-of-the-fbis-hillary-cl/

http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/person.asp?personId=222852653&privcapId=40152409

This could be the most important thing to come out of the IG report, the revelation that Justin Cooper was so involved in managing Clinton's private email server.

And don't worry about the Dick Morris connection in one of those links. Yes, he's a right wing weirdo, but all he's doing is putting together the info from the IG report. And yes, it's definitely Cooper mentioned in the report. The report almost never names names, but it leaves enough info for people to figure out who is being referred to. In this case, the person being talked about is the one who registered Clinton's server, and previous news reports identified that as Cooper, and other details mentioned could only apply to Cooper.

Why is this so important? As Morris points out, it's highly likely that Cooper had no security clearance, since he never worked for the US government. He was basically Bill Clinton's personal assistant, which meant the Clintons trusted him, but he had no legal authority to look at classified information. And yet he helped manage Clinton's private server, which contained above top secret information!

Here's my theory on why he was involved. Bryan Pagliano was the main person to run the server, but he had a full time job working for the State Department in Washington, DC. (And the IG report reveals that he was managing the server during his business hours in that job, another big no-no.) Most of the time, Pagliano could deal with server problems remotely. But from time to time, one had to deal with the problem by physically interacting with the server. That's where Cooper comes in. My theory is that Cooper was usually where Bill Clinton was, which meant the Chappaqua house where the server was located or in nearby New York City (less than 100 miles away). So the IG report notes that when the server had to be physically shut down and then restarted due to a hacker attack, it was Cooper who did it, not Pagliano.

And that would have been fine if Cooper had the proper security clearance to have access to the info on that server, but there's no evidence so far that he did. This could put Hillary Clinton in great legal jeopardy, because it meant she willingly exposed the entire contents of her server to someone she knew shouldn't be seeing that information.

It's been reported by The Washington Times that the Clintons have been paying hundreds of thousands of dollars of Cooper's legal bills. That didn't make sense to me. Why would he have such high legal bills in the first place when he hasn't even been linked to any legal case? But now that makes total sense. Although the mainstream media has totally missed it, it's likely that Cooper (along with Pagliano) is a key part of the case the FBI is building against Clinton.

It would be great if people here could dig up more info on Cooper. For instance, when did his ties to The Clinton Foundation and Teneo begin? It seems he was deeply involved in some of the Clintons' corrupt quid pro quo arrangements, which makes his access to all that classified information that much more disturbing.
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

paulthompson

(2,398 posts)
5. Thanks...
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:15 PM
May 2016

Thanks, but there already is a thread about this in this forum, and I made my post there too:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280202931#post18

I just thought I'd get more attention on it by posting it at the Primaries forum.

Apparently, I'm banned from starting new threads at that forum for a while. Would someone else want to try starting a thread there on this? The bits about Dick Morris and the Washington Times were completely unnecessary - I didn't realize either of those sources were forbidden. So one could just repost my post with those parts edited out.

And here's another good link about Cooper. It's archived from 2012, the time in question:

https://web.archive.org/web/20121010015748/http://www.decisionsciencescorp.com/about-us/advisory-board/

SheenaR

(2,052 posts)
6. Great job Fawke and Paul
Fri May 27, 2016, 09:53 PM
May 2016

I have gotten through about half of the OIG report. I have no earthly clue how they all can bury their heads in the sand on this. This shit is no joke. She could not have been more careless.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
8. Dick Morris, Bill Clinton, and triangulation
Fri May 27, 2016, 11:52 PM
May 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Morris#Morris_and_the_Clintons

Morris first worked with Bill and Hillary Clinton during Bill Clinton's successful 1978 bid for Governor of Arkansas. Morris did not have a role in Clinton's successful 1992 presidential campaign, which instead was headed by David Wilhelm, James Carville, George Stephanopoulos, and Paul Begala. After the 1994 mid-term election, in which Republicans took control of both houses of the United States Congress and gained considerable power in the states, Clinton once again sought Morris' help to prepare for the 1996 Presidential election. It was Morris who proposed a strategy that is now referred to as triangulation, in which Clinton would appeal to a diverse group of voters by distancing himself from both the Democratic and Republican parties. From the early months of 1995 to August 1996, Morris was a principal architect of the Clinton-Gore re-election strategy, which proved successful, as the Democratic Party's Clinton-Gore ticket defeated the Republican Party's Dole-Kemp ticket by over 8,000,000 ballots in the popular vote and earned more than twice as many electoral votes in the Electoral College, with 379 to Dole-Kemp's 159.


Will Brock end up like Morris, and (once again) become a forbidden source of information?

I sort of get the emotions involved, though Brock is now cool, Morris is now scum, so unlike Brock's information, which must be regurgitated, information from Morris requires a brain wipe. Brock good, Morris bad. Morris when working for Bill, good, not working for Bill, is incapable of having possession of information.

Brock, doubleplusgood.
For now.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
16. I think that a number of Sanders supporters have been removed from the jury
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:54 PM
May 2016

pool to make it easier for the Clinton fans to hide whatever they want.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
18. Absolutely spot on. They're not even hiding their bias anymore.
Sat May 28, 2016, 09:32 PM
May 2016

This place is going to be nothing but an echo chamber after the upcoming purge.

Response to Fawke Em (Original post)

jillan

(39,451 posts)
10. Dick Morris helped Bill get elected. That is an inconvenient truth & should not be a reason
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:59 AM
May 2016

for a hide. That was Bill's buddy.


Richard S. "Dick" Morris (born November 28, 1946) is an American political author and commentator who previously worked as a pollster, political campaign consultant, and general political consultant.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

A friend and advisor to Bill Clinton during his time as Governor of Arkansas, Morris became a political adviser to the White House after Clinton was elected president in 1992. Morris encouraged Clinton to pursue third way policies of triangulation that combined traditional Republican and Democratic proposals, rhetoric, and issues so as to achieve maximum political gain and popularity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Morris
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
11. They're trying to suppress all in-depth investigation into the Clintons.
Sat May 28, 2016, 04:00 AM
May 2016

It's insane. They managed to get polite, well-behaved Paul put on review.

The Hill fans are in a frenzy; they're trying to blame everything on us.

Thanks for saving this.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Glad I saved this during ...