Sanders and Chomsky agree
Noam Chomskys 8-Point Rationale for Voting for the Lesser Evil Presidential Candidate
Critics of lesser evil voting should consider that their footing on the high ground may not be as secure as they often take for granted.
By John Halle, Noam Chomsky / Noam Chomskys Official Site
August 6, 2016
Among the elements of the weak form of democracy enshrined in the constitution, presidential elections continue to pose a dilemma for the left in that any form of participation or non participation appears to impose a significant cost on our capacity to develop a serious opposition to the corporate agenda served by establishment politicians. The position outlined below is that which many regard as the most effective response to this quadrennial Hobsons choice, namely the so-called lesser evil voting strategy or LEV. Simply put, LEV involves, where you can, i.e. in safe states, voting for the losing third party candidate you prefer, or not voting at all. In competitive swing states, where you must, one votes for the lesser evil Democrat.
Before fielding objections, it will be useful to make certain background stipulations with respect to the points below. The first is to note that since changes in the relevant facts require changes in tactics, proposals having to do with our relationship to the electoral extravaganza should be regarded as provisional. This is most relevant with respect to point 3) which some will challenge by citing the claim that Clintons foreign policy could pose a more serious menace than that of Trump.
In any case, while conceding as an outside possibility that Trumps foreign policy is preferable, most of us not already convinced that that is so will need more evidence than can be aired in a discussion involving this statement. Furthermore, insofar as this is the fact of the matter, following the logic through seems to require a vote for Trump, though its a bit hard to know whether those making this suggestion are intending it seriously.
Continued
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/noam-chomskys-8-point-rationale-voting-lesser-evil-presidential-candidate
---
Personally, I think the prospect of throwing away Progressive gains via a tRump presidency are too great. I will be voting for Hillary based on how both Sanders and Chomsky have stated the case to do just that.