Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumSeattle will be okay for Sanders
Last edited Sun Aug 9, 2015, 12:02 PM - Edit history (6)
if we make it so. People may not like this or listen, but I've got something to say.
Fellow Bernie supporters and BLM non-black allies, if you are wondering, "Why aren't they protesting HRC or the GOP candidates?" or "This is a Soros funded conspiracy" or "Bernie has the best civil rights record" or "this just hurts the BLM movement and Sanders," or "how dare they call liberals or progressives racists," then stop it, please. Doing this hurts Bernie Sander's campaign and lets the wedge be driven in that will harm us all. We Sanders supporters must make it a priority to understand and listen to young Black activists in this country, no matter what their tactics. We must be knowledgeable and then walk the walk (not just the talk) better than the supporters of any other candidate. Why? Because it is on us to skillfully take advantage of this publicity to fight for justice and equality, to learn and understand, and form a more perfect union. If we do that, Sanders will win.
I'm asking everyone not familiar with the concept to learn about WHITE FRAGILITY and also to reflect on the state of emergency Black America is in right now.
(*Edited below after rewatching and listening to the video*)
Who gives a shit if Marissa Jenae called white progressives 'racists' in Seattle? Really? White ppl are going to get upset about an insulting name while their Black neighbors are getting unjustly killed and imprisoned at rates much higher than average? Maybe getting upset is what we need. Maybe getting off our asses and rolling up our sleeves is what we need. A few vocal people in that crowd booed at those two young Black women. But if we feel critical of her words, if her tactics and emotions were so misguided, then, like enlightened progressives why don't we rise above? Bernie supporters are a smart, caring group, some of them more mature and older than her. A lot of them just listened non-violently. Now that's powerful too. HRC folks don't have this opportunity at their events because from what I can tell, these same activists have already given up on her.
I'm not going to talk about what those women did. Rather, if liberals are so wonderful -- then we should damn well act like it. We should create the America we want to see, right now. The truth of how really caring and skilled progressives are is coming to the surface and we have to prove our vision of ourselves. We have to prove we care by actually doing something to change our criminal justice system, to stop the next incident of Police brutality. How f'ing long to Black people have to wait? Why not think of what *we* can do, rather than what these activists *should* do? We only have control over our behavior and speech.
Do you know, what MLK wrote in "Why We Can't Wait" that his greatest disappointment was? It was the passive silence of white progressives, the lack of action by white clergy. As a white progressive, ally of BLM and Bernie Sanders supporter, I've found it's not just about what's right in your MIND, it's what you actually DO that convinces people you are on their side. There's a big step between feeling SMUG, and putting your ass on the line for someone other than yourself.
Just today we have a really weak and embarrassing example of stupid words. Try reading this as if you were a family member of Sandra Bland or Eric Garner http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/09/1410125/--BowDownBernie-No-GrowUpBLM
and you'll see how self-satisfied, "you people should wait" condescending and infuriating it sounds. To a Mom mourning a son or daughter it is just words, just White tears, unreflective White fragility BS, and it's sickeningly ignorant when compared to the scale of suffering and racism rampant in this country.
Bernie supporters, and I count myself among them (I've donated $$ and have my bumpersticker and am in my local campaign), what we do and say now really matters. I urge you not to attack people, accuse them, or think there is a conspiracy. Some courage is called for, some actively getting out of our comfort zones and regular routines and media, to find out as much as possible about BLM and Outside Agitators, and to make JUSTICE and EQUALITY more important than our own egos or fears that Sanders might not win. He will win. This is our golden chance to make an effort to reach out, listen, to exercise patience and generosity.
safeinOhio
(32,727 posts)Time to turn the other cheek. No time for anger, time to just get to work.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Agreed.
safeinOhio
(32,727 posts)But anger and revenge have all ways been counter productive.
If someone pisses you off, try to be extra nice to them and they give up when you don't play their game.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)racial minorities.
I also hope that the BLM does not stoop to repeatedly calling Bernie "the enemy". Because if that gets long and sustained traction then I fear that our coalition could be at risk. That wouldn't benefit ANY of us.
I don't have a problem with their disruptive protests as long as it does not unfairly single out Bernie for partisan political gain for another candidate. That also would not benefit any of us. If these protests continue in order to paint Bernie as a racist in order to prevent PoC from supporting him, well, I'm afraid I would have a difficult time supporting the group (even as I strongly support massive structural changes on social justice processes within our country).
Chiquitita
(752 posts)I'm sure these activists are going to get tons of push back from a lot of quarters. There aren't going to be a lot of people willing to step into their shoes and take that kind of heat either.
Ultimately I think this will be a positive for Bernie. BLM supporters will take notice of him and the campaign can use the publicity to reach out.
The objective of the activists to me seems to be to call out of white progressives on their hypocrisy and inaction. It won't be a gain for any other candidate; there is no other candidate! I think it's just finally dawning on a large scale that white liberals need to really, really put their money where their mouths are.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)This primary season sure isn't going to be boring that's for sure!
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)and States Attorneys General - people and institutions who can actually do something about the problem but aren't. Bernie's propised plans to deal with police abuse but he isn't currently in a position to stop it right now.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)Chiquitita
(752 posts)It's a good idea. What if a bunch of activists did this?
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)Chiquitita
(752 posts)I'll join you.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)but I guess that's what the OP wanted?
Tears are transparent and have no color.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)and thus, can empathize with how anger can fail us all.
well said!
go Bernie!
Chiquitita
(752 posts)don't we all... Thanks, and go Bernie!
whathehell
(29,095 posts)and maybe you'll get actual readers.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)race baiting sucks no matter who is doing it.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)its not a bad post.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)b/c i'm white + progressive. it's not a small thing. it's not something that people forget. it's not "white fragility" to object to being called a racist.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)I've been excluded from my educational activist stuff and told to step back because I'm too white (only by other whites though!) So, maybe some of it rubbed off on me.
The real issue isn't our feelings, or the insulting title of my post.
It's how can Bernie Sander's campaign be successful, and how can we, together, stop police brutality and make "Liberty and Justice for All" more than just words in our pledge.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Is there any response but a positive one that won't be written off as white privilage?
Chiquitita
(752 posts)It doesn't have to apologize or approve. That's why I mentioned rising above. If someone doesn't respect you, someone shouts at you, calls you names you don't think you deserve, well, when you are a kid you yell back, you might disrespect them and defend yourself.
When you are an older adult, looking at that young person you try to understand them, their passion, their impatience and anger. You respect them for as a human being whether their behavior merits it at that moment or not, because you are modeling leadership, modeling civil democracy. You are teaching. I think, in this sense, Bernie did great and there is nothing to worry about.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)do you think this helps you get your point across?
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Quote me. I'll edit if it merits. I want Bernie to win as much as you do.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)You've already neutralized the race baiting by removing "color" from
tears. Wise move.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)am I an HRC supporter for the nomination. I edited the thread to make sure nothing could be twisted that way. Anyway, I have seen the concept of white tears used a lot in conversations among college students to explain the issue of scale of the wound of injustice, like when people are racially profiled and receive unjust treatment.
What I understand by "White tears" is when someone comes to you with a broken arm asking for help and you say, "what about my hangnail? It hurts too."
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)we get that you're angry and want to make to make a point. so at least have the courage to own up to what you're writing here.
i didn't alert your post. i asked you to edit it. now return the favor by turning the mirror on yourself and realize that you came in here with guns blazing calling names and race baiting. no one shot names back at you. no one alerted you. why do you think that is? is that the way racists and white supremacists would react?
i read the Kos post you linked to -- there's nothing in there I'd disagree with. what these BLM outliers are doing is turning everyone off to the movement. maybe it's NOT a HRC op -- maybe the op is on you. maybe the whole point is to turn your closest coalition partners against BLM.
if you're 50, and have been an activist for any amount of time, then you should have some experience with the way that real ops work. This shit only hurts BLM, and it could turn people off for good. read up on the ops that were conducted against environmentalists in the late 80s and early 90s. it's the same thing. one agitator goes way out beyond what the rest are doing, and that provides the premise for the whole the movement to be smeared.
BLM needs to ask the President what's up with his task force on "community policing" that was convened in December 2014. Heard anything from that? a little agitation would go a long way with this president who has nothing left to lose and everything to gain by establishing a legacy. if it's really about stopping the killing and criminal justice reform, then go to the source.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)and to engage with me. I'm trying to be honest. The truth is, I'm not really afraid of making other DUers mad or having them unfriend me. I have no one on ignore. I don't think I'm more knowledgeable than anyone, nor do I have a list of shoulds for individuals.
I'm advocating a strategy for people like me. If you are a Bernie Sanders supporter, ally of BLM and white, I think a nonviolent social media response, a patient in-person response, a response of doing more research into what people of various ages and hues are saying will turn this event to our advantage.
I do apologize for pushing people's sensitive buttons, but I think that all of here on DU can take it or they can put me on ignore. From my perspective, progressives need to maximize on this opportunity to hear Black voices, and not worry about ourselves.
I won't tell BLM what it needs to do, or any other organization that I'm not directly involved in, because all I can control are my own thoughts, words and actions.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Chiquitita
(752 posts)And your line above isn't exactly not abusive. But, either was my post. So, my bad.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)Show that to all the homeless whites on the street -- They would love to have it!
Chiquitita
(752 posts)And I come from poor whites, I'm not ashamed to say. But as soon as my folks got an education and a foothold with the GI bill and a HUD mortgage, they were good to go. Didn't always work out the same for people of a darker hue back in the 50s and 60s.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)"That was then, this is now"!
If Bernie doesn't deserve any respect for his civil rights
work in the 40's and 50's, why should there be "white tears"
for their lack of opportunity back then?
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Without a question he deserves great respect. He has my money and my vote, in addition to that.
It's about whether saying "respect him for this" will advance his campaign with 18-35 year olds. It's just strategy. I think there's an age gap, personally.
I teach 18-22 year olds and have two teens. If we want the young vote we won't get it by repeating what is painfully obvious to those of us who are 35+.
And, "what have you done lately?" is not an unreasonable question.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)For God's sake, he's an old man!.
"What have you done lately" may not be unreasonable when asked. but
it IS when shouted. My point is that everyone here is on board with the message
of blm -- It's the TACTICS that are alienating them.
Btw, If 18 to 25 year olds are not "impressed" by Bernie's record,
maybe they shoud learn history
Chiquitita
(752 posts)That's just what I think. Bernie's a hell of an old man. An awesome guy. I don't feel sorry for him because I think he's strong and authentic. His father's family was murdered. He gets this in his bones, for sure. He can take it, and he and his campaign are doing it right. Why doesn't this happen to HRC? Because she's so scripted and secure, it can't. But I feel, despite the polls, there is no enthusiasm for her among the BLM supporter voter subset. Bernie's not going to lose out to another candidate on this issue.
But we supporters can make a big leap, a big effort, we have to stop being so self-defensive, and all this will work itself out. If, we show up with our hands and bodies to stop the brutality and inequality that disproportionally affects people of color in our country.
And I agree, the tactics are alienating some people. And their alienated reactions are in turn alienating others who support BLM (but aren't activists, aren't necessarily using these tactics, but feel the same anger and priorities). I'm trying to get the focus off of self-justification, and promote a unifying strategy. You know, love your neighbor stuff, rather than yourself.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)It sounds like your saying we have to.teach then how to behave. I neither believe that
nor imagine an attemp.at that will be helpful.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)I'm saying that we should model the behavior and values we want to see. If they find it convincing that it is up to them. Words don't change people, actions do. How do you influence people if not by modeling your values?
whathehell
(29,095 posts)First of all, I think Bernie can "handle it", I just don't think he should HAVE to handle it. I disagree
profoundly with on the issue of "respect"- Respect ALWAYS matters, imo, and you can be assured that few
if any, will listen to your or your message, however just, if you do NOT address them with basic respect.
You seem to feel certain groups who have past and/or present grievances, deserve a 'pass' on that.
I do not, and judging by this thread, most here do not either.
As to "modeling" values...That's already being done, by most in white AND black communities.
Sorry, but it seems a rather lame suggestion.
whathehell
(29,095 posts)is a false one, and only works as an invitation to beat up
on innocent white people like Bernie and so many others.
It's a divisive tactic.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Will cause most of them to tune you out. White liberals are also outraged by what's been happening to African Americans but many of them are going to stop listening to Black Lives Matter groups. Human nature is what it is... screaming at someone simply angers them no matter how justified the screams are.
This is my fear.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)And you look at that young woman's face. Maybe it's because I'm a teacher, but words like that don't take long to blow away in the wind if you actually connect with a person. If we are outraged, we should be working to change things. Complaining about what young Black activists do isn't enough.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Since tears are colorless and transparent.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Honestly, this is a serious question.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)and it makes the whole BLM movement seem crazy to do that. it's undermining all the work that has been done. all the minds that have been changed...this shit will flush it down the tubes.
if you cared at all about BLM and the movement, you'd distance yourself.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)Chiquitita
(752 posts)for everyone. For me, for BLM.
What's your strategy for winning this election? for getting the youth vote? That's what I want. Talking to you has made me realize it. I want to energize young PoC to vote. And I'm not worried about young white progressives. On Tumblr and Reddit they are leagues ahead of old folks like me.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)and organizing in neighborhoods for change. that's one tactic. it's up to the members of the committees to come up with their own tactics beyond that -- which they've done here.
in terms of GOTV, it's fine to say you want young PoC to turnout, but to have an impact there must be coalitions built. what the PTB is afraid of is brown/black/white coalitions. so while you might not care for young white people on Reddit or wherever, they're needed if a coalition is going to have power.
every time one of these high-profile ruptures occurs, a Rove wannabe gets his wings. don't give them that satisfaction.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Maybe you're right. I just don't like all the whining and no action. I'm used to being in a room full of able bodied people and when it comes time to bend an elbow, there's a lot of laziness. But no one likes to be called lazy.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)As you. I'm seeing it everywhere. The Netroots Nation protest was different. This was directed at the audience. And attacking people, justified as it may be, just causes them to attack back or stop engaging with you.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)I don't feel like judging them. I do think that Sanders supporters don't have anything to worry about.
Triana
(22,666 posts)If you're an activist, you work WITH the campaign(s), not against them. You refrain from calling rally attendees names, calling the candidate whose rally you usurped names, and insulting people.
DUH. That will get you NO support. No matter how passionate you are, or what's going on. I'm sorry but it just WON'T get you support.
Human nature doesn't work that way. It just doesn't.
I'd suggest (and mind I'm an ignorant whitey) working WITH instead of against Sanders and getting his PERMISSION to speak at his rallys (ie: NOT OVERTAKE THEM.)
OTOH if BLM dislikes Sanders SO much that they don't bother to protest anyone else and don't even want to talk to him (just AT him after usurping his rallies), then for GOD'S SAKE support someone ELSE.
What? There IS no one else? Well then WTF is BLM doing usurping the rallies of the only candidate who even remotely would address their issues, insulting his rally attendees, and insulting him as a candidate and ultimately expecting to get ANYWHERE?
WHAT IS THE END GAME? Destroy, disrupt Sanders...he loses... and then....WHAT?
What will BLM get then.
Seriously?
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)ignore.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)If you forgive me I'll bring cookies next time.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Not one vote will be lost for Bernie because of the protest.
Let's move on.
#FeelTheBern
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Yes, moving on.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Your cause isn't to bring peace among the races, it isn't to reach equality or justice. It's just to wild out, be ignorant, shout down good people, and generally make asses of yourselves. You had a good message, but you screwed it up by being assholes. I hope next time you pull this shit you get shown the door, forcibly.
d_b
(7,463 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)campaign tactic.
People who cite the terrible injustices and unfair treatment as problems which demand immediate action, then summarize with "and that is why I can't support Bernie Sanders" are cheapening their cause.
aikoaiko
(34,184 posts)MuseRider
(34,125 posts)100%.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)I usually don't post, although I have been a member since 2004. I feel like my work with college students, especially since I teach a big course on Latino studies, with lots of conversations, gives me some insight into young voters.
MuseRider
(34,125 posts)activist work for a group they do not belong to understands this. NEVER tell a group doing serious work about a very serious problem how to do it if you are not a person included in that group. It is our job, those of us not in the group, to help them the way they direct so they don't have to be this extreme. Bernie will be fine. I do not think there is a bone in his body that does not respond in the correct way to any group that is feeling the pain of not being equal or in this case more immediately being frightened and rightfully so just to be alive in this country right now. He has a different way of going about things and he listens. He will adapt. If he does not then he is not who I thought he was and I will move on but I do not think that will happen.
BLM is making a lot of noise. I am pretty sure they don't really care what anyone thinks of them, it is keeping the message front and center. There really is no better way for them to do this. I cannot understand how anyone could expect them to not be franticly doing anything to keep what is happening front and center. These days it would be forgotten for the most part and swallowed up by the other news so quickly. We all have a tendency to look aside when we are not being threatened. They are in the direct line of fire. They should be screaming. Not much else works these days.
Good for you with your work. Keep using that insight here.
BLM is doing what they think they need to do. Disrupting is not taking away toys although it sounds like many feel that way. I have never understood the immediate reaction of being threatened when your privilege has never allowed you to ever really feel what that is like.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 9, 2015, 05:39 PM - Edit history (1)
but I do know nothing forms mobs based on utterly hermetically isolated discourses faster than college sophomores
(pero no menudos)
within our ivory tower people tend to dangerously wad everything they can into an intro course and make concepts easy
theories of racism as a constant and dynamic negotiation, as a color line that in fact DEPENDS on being constantly crossed, the actually-fraught relationship between strands of anti-racism and strands of feminism, ambivalence and redefinition (white Latinos and "red" Irish)--and that's all for starters: a white Wellesley poetry professor isn't the ultimate word in thinking about prejudice
in my experience, likewise debt-slave prostitutes and women's activists who've had their husbands shot have little use for someone who's only read MacKinnon, and the the Acjachemen are split between pro-diocese and pro-Franciscan factions right now--I don't think Olin Tezcatlipoca could even process that
I won't say WHAT I am online because I refuse to feed that beast and play that game: I could be gay, Black, Latino, or something that'd make an attacker do a 180, or I could be light enough that every racist in the area naturally lumbers over and takes me into their Klannish confidence
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Everyone is being enslaved by the oligarchy and they are on the brink of a total take over. Does BLM give a shit about the bigger picture?
Chiquitita
(752 posts)except they have brothers and sisters who have been killed and hurt and that means more to them. Maybe. I'm just guessing.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Chiquitita
(752 posts)I don't have the answer. Except, they must be somehow intertwined, not in a hierarchy. I want Bernie to win.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)BLM does not represent the vast majority of black people either BTW. In fact they are pissing off other black people.
https://www.facebook.com/AfricanAmericansForBernie
Here's one comment of note: That they're ridiculous and clearly have done no research on Bernie. But I'm trying to see the silver lining in hoping that somehow, because of this more attention will be given to Bernie by the minority community. Bernie should outright say, "Why would you come to my rally and interrupt me when I've been fighting for you all YOUR life."
I'm not sure of the numbers in the "vast majority" vs. BLM though.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)I'm not saying they shouldn't have a voice but they are only hurting the one person who will help them. They are not the only ones by far in this bigger fight. You think the oligarchy is going to give a shit about BLM or bad cops or corrupt politicians or wars for profit? There are priorities in this war against the oligarchy and right now Bernie is our only chance to have a person who represents us all as the POTUS.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)the same unproductive behavior over and over, and expecting a different result.
We progressive Bernie supporters, of all races, genders, and sexual orientations, believe that one thing we can do to help prevent African Americans from being abused and murdered by psycho cops, and improve their social and economic conditions, is to get Bernie elected to the Presidency.
We can unite and do our best to nominate and elect a sincere, concerned President who actually gets that black lives matter, and who actually cares about the systemic racism and economic and social injustice that have been inflicted upon African Americans and other, and who will actually make every effort to do something about it.
Non African Americans cannot presume to lead African American movements for justice and equality. Even if we are of another minority, we haven't lived the black experience. African Americans can lead, and the rest of us can follow, as long as they explicitly tell us what they would like us to do. If African Americans do not explicitly tell us what they would like us to do to help, and we have no intrinsic knowledge basis for leadership in AA movements, we are all left here wanting to help. but not knowing how to help.
You mentioned that these two young leaders of BLM in Seattle were "passionate, inexperienced young firebrands". Passionate, inexperienced young firebrands do not make good leaders. The have tendency to walk off of cliffs, not watching where they are going while looking up at the sky, taking those who follow them off the cliff with them.
As an activist, I recognize and respect the effectiveness of disrupting political rallies to get a point across. However, when doing so, it is important to make it perfectly clear that you do not have nefarious partisan political ulterior motives when making your case. BLM leaders at NN made a serious mistake by disrupting an event that did not include Hillary Clinton. They irreparably damaged the credibility of their movement by making it appear that their action could have been one of political partisanship rather than purely to make the case that we all need to be aware of the desperate conditions that exist, and take action to solve them.
Like it or not, assuming the motives of BLM's leadership are singular and sincere, the leadership of BLM has very seriously fucked up by tainting the general public's view of their credibility, and have left themselves wide open to accusations of maliciously using a very important and righteous cause to attempt to damage Bernie Sander's reputation and campaign, and shill for Hillary Clinton, in an effort to help Clinton win the nomination.
The leadership of BLM has made a very serious error, and continues to err by only disrupting the events of one candidate, while at the same time basically ignoring past racist words and actions of Hillary Clinton while aimlessly flailing away at a candidate who clearly has, at the very least, sincerely attempted to support justice and equality for African Americans for several decades.
And no matter what they do from here on out, BLM will never be able get this toothpaste back in the tube. They have made the motivation for their activism legitimately suspect, and continue to do so.
Wise leadership would do damage control starting right now, and help restore BLM credibility, and could help this movement become a focused, effective, constructive force for significant positive change. But there does not appear to be another MLK on the horizon right now, and I doubt BLM would pay attention to direction from a long experienced activist leader like Rev. Jesse Jackson, Jr.
So we're all waiting, and listening, and waiting, for BLM to tell us what they'd like the rest of the world to do to help them, as many have been wondering what the plan is.
Telling us we need to vote for Hillary Clinton would be the exact wrong answer. That is the same path that has led directly off the cliff for everyone but the very wealthy, for decades. The same path that has put many African Americans in the desperate straits they are in at this time.
Voting for Hillary Clinton would continue the process of repeating the same unproductive behavior over and over, while expecting a different result.
Real progressives, of all colors, gender, and sexual orientation, didn't fall off he turnip truck yesterday. Wealthy private interests have all the money, power, and talent in the world to promote agendas and actions that serve their interests, and they do it with malicious, anti-democratic intent, every single day, early, and often, without conscience.
BLM indisputably has a righteous and legitimate cause. If they wish to restore their credibility, they would be wise to make it clear that their only purpose is to advocate and gain justice and equality for African Americans. Because it is definitely not clear to large numbers of people that this is their only agenda.
08/06/2015
snip---
Some better questions are whether #BlackLivesMatter is really anything like a peoples movement aimed at changing society and lives for the better, or is it the private vehicle of its co-creators who get to take it where they decide to go? To whom are #BlackLivesMatter's leaders accountable, and just where are they taking their movement? Barack Obama's 2008 campaign marketed itself as the movement too.
Why doesn't the #BlackLivesMatter movement, supposedly focused upon the unique needs of people of color, have any critique of the black political class, almost all Democrats, who have been key stakeholders in the building of the prison state, in gentrification and school privatization from New Orleans to Detroit and beyond, and who helped peddle the subprime mortgages to black families which exploded and cut black family wealth by nine-tenths? Have they even noticed that a black president has closed and privatized more public schools than any other in US history? For all the big words they use, do they ever mention the word capitalism?
There are ominous signs. Last month folks whom Alicia Garza described as part of our team disrupted two minor white male candidates at NetRootsNation, the annual networking event for paid and wannabe paid Democratic party activists, embarrassing them with demands over structural racism and say her name. If they were positioning themselves for careers inside the far-flung Democratic party apparatus, it was a smart move, because Hillary wasn't there. Hence they got noticed in that crowd of Democrat operatives without antagonizing the people with the real money and connections.
snip---
It's appropriate to wonder what a movement really is these days. Maybe movements nowadays are really brands, to be evoked and stoked by marketers and creators when needed. But it's hard to imagine a brand transferring the power from the wealthy to the poor. It's hard to imagine a brand being accountable to its membership, even if you could be a member of a brand. And it's impossible for a brand to prefigure, to get us ready to imagine and become the kind of people we'll need to be to build the new world after capitalism.
http://www.blackagendareport.com/wheres-the-blacklivesmatter-critique-of-black-political-class
So don't tell me to just STFU and get in line.
Show me authentic, show me real, and then tell me the plan. I need this, because I have been subjected to smoke, lies, deception, and abuse by the wealthy private interests that own hostile forces which are hostile to democracy and justice within the Democratic party for several decades. These hostile forces use vague shit to tell lies and use these lies to deceive gullible people into acting against their own interests.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251495072
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)I don't have to agree with their tactics in order to support reform of the justice system and dismantling of the racist police state.
Anyone can don the mantle of "BLM" and go disrupt political events. The Seattle individuals seem to be particularly misguided.
artislife
(9,497 posts)I know it sounds harsh to fellow Bernie supporters but if we can take our outrage for Bernie out of the equation, we could listen more closely and not be sooo offended.
Having our feelings hurt is hard, but not as painful as racism.
So I love my fellow Bernie supporters and I am not asking anyone to shut up, but maybe ....to move on.
And I thank you Chiquitita for creating this OP.
I liked it.
Chiquitita
(752 posts)I appreciate your words!