Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
Tue May 5, 2015, 07:09 AM May 2015

The economic questions of our time, by Bernie Sanders

The economic questions of our time:

How does it happen that, despite huge gains in technology and productivity, the average American today is working longer hours for less wages?

How does it happen that the median family income today is almost $5,000 less than in 1999, while 99% of all new income is going to the top 1%?

Senator Bernie Sanders (I), Vermont.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The economic questions of our time, by Bernie Sanders (Original Post) merrily May 2015 OP
Trade deficit. Enthusiast May 2015 #1
Yes, it is the trade deficit Red Oak May 2015 #4
Nicely said. erronis May 2015 #5
Most people do vote their pocketbooks. "It's the economy, stupid," to quote Carville. merrily May 2015 #7
Plutocracies are like that... KJG52 May 2015 #2
We need Bernie!! AzDar May 2015 #3
And I would argue that many of us in IT have helped automation a lot... cascadiance May 2015 #6
Yep. Please see Reply 7. merrily May 2015 #8

Red Oak

(697 posts)
4. Yes, it is the trade deficit
Tue May 5, 2015, 09:56 AM
May 2015

A deficit of $56B a month is about 0.3 percent of our GDP every month or about 3.6 percent of our GDP per year assuming a U.S. gross domestic product of 16.77 Trillion dollars per year. With those headwinds over decades, it is little wonder the U.S. middle class and even more so those struggling to make middle class, are under such pressure and suffering so much.

My amazement in our political system is that the non-one-percent doesn't vote in its own economic interests. Both parties trot out social issues during the campaigns to deflect the real issue - money. The pattern has been repeated for decades.

The truth is that the Democratic party (of today) and the Republican party are in lockstep agreement on this vital issue of trade (vital to the one percent) - free trade is good for all.

It is so obviously NOT good for all.

We can change this - vote your pocketbook.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
7. Most people do vote their pocketbooks. "It's the economy, stupid," to quote Carville.
Wed May 6, 2015, 12:15 AM
May 2015

Thing is, you have to convince them which candidate will best serve the interests of their pocketbook (aka family). And that takes money. Maybe not billions, but a good amount. And the catch 22 there is that the multi-millionaires and multi-billionaires are not going to be donating to Bernie. Somehow, we have to make up for that.


www.berniesanders.com

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
6. And I would argue that many of us in IT have helped automation a lot...
Tue May 5, 2015, 02:37 PM
May 2015

... that has helped them work with a smaller work force, who is made more efficient (and should be worth MORE when harnessing technology to turn out more product and services).

But they just reward higher level management with more pay or stock options instead of those who DO the work to give them this advantage that they use to just lay people off and not raise their pay. And us IT folk that do this work have our jobs outsourced through BS "Free Trade" treaties or H-1B Visa hires, to the point that our salaries are reduced and more of us than ever are just contract workers instead.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»The economic questions of...