in a nutshell.

Yep, it's Satan.

One thing just lead to another

please don't copyright it.

so a regretful people can return the favor.

that buys these phone polls that we all wait eagerly for.

If their written propaganda doesn't brainwash us then their bought and paid for pollsters tell us who is winning and to just accept it. They trash and ignore internet real people polling because it clouds their control over the people.

They have bought and paid off our politicians, how hard do you think it is to bribe corporate and small university pollsters who govern themselves?

When their polls dictate who will win and then control the election counting they can stifle a people's uprising by pointing to those dictated matching poll results.

Let's keep pounding the pavement for Bernie.

say about journalism and how it is to be practiced.

eom

that this enterprise was and should be considered deeply involved with what transpired in the death of a thirteen year old girl in England.
They fired and have now re-hired the managing editor that tried to cover-up that murder and Murdoch was brought in for questioning, because he knew from the reporting, I find it remarkable that they re-hired her, when she was eye ball deep into the situation and Murdoch knew----------------that's what is so disgusting they knew and didn't do anything to help the parents or the police.
So if anything this man and his team of greed is just that nothing more, they have no principles and there morality is who buys of whom

And they consider themselves journalists and should be trusted------------------no thanks people have died under this team-------------I rest my case


Oh, by the way fix noise and the wall (toilet) paper journal:


Honk-------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016

Doncha love how they try to make it sound like it's $18 trillion ON TOP OF the trillions we pay now?


Who buys into these sophomoric deceptions.... besides uneducated Teabaggers... who don't read the WSJ?

There's a lot of 'blatancy' going on about Sanders. See it all over the place. Even on DU!

$15 trillion minus $5 trillion in savings for net cost of $10 trillion? It's still not clear to me from this article.

if If only he was fully against all these wars that arguing on. I haven't seen any serious discussion about our terrible foreign policy yet.

He has clearly and frequently talked about the disastrous Iraq and Afghan war, as well as the gulf war, and Vietnam just to name a few. And how he was against each from the outset.

It seems to me that it accomplished just what it intended to. AFAIK, there was no fallout of note for the WSJ, and I bet far more people saw the original report than saw any of the "corrections" elsewhere.

let the people listen, and let the chips fall where they may. All that money they must have spent so far that has only gone to HELP the target of their smears.