Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leftcoastmountains

(2,968 posts)
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 10:16 PM Oct 2015

CNN’s Double-Standards on Debates

-snip-
For decades, mainstream U.S. news outlets have bent over backwards to appease conservatives and avoid the stigma “liberal media,” but there has been no similar accommodation for progressives, as Jeff Cohen notes about CNN’s handling of the upcoming Democratic debate.

By Jeff Cohen

At the CNN-sponsored Republican Party debate last month at the Reagan presidential library, one of the three panelists CNN selected to question the candidates was conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, affiliated with the proudly right-wing Salem Radio Network. But at Tuesday’s upcoming Democratic Party debate, CNN is not planning to include a single progressive advocate among its panel of four questioners.

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/10/09/cnns-double-standards-on-debates

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN’s Double-Standards on Debates (Original Post) leftcoastmountains Oct 2015 OP
Well, of course not. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #1
Not "some" instructions, but totally explicit instructions, a la Monty Python Divernan Oct 2015 #6
FUX.jr pansypoo53219 Oct 2015 #2
FAUX Lite... chillfactor Oct 2015 #3
Ugh, so probably 4 Hillary supporters? jfern Oct 2015 #4
The DWS DNC DLC Third Way Establishment Has Stacked The Deck Out Of Fear Of Voter Reprisals cantbeserious Oct 2015 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Oct 2015 #7

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. Well, of course not.
Sat Oct 10, 2015, 10:20 PM
Oct 2015

Having an actual progressive asking questions would highlight the fact that the chosen establishment candidate isn't progressive. I wouldn't blame CNN, though. I imagine they had some instructions from the DNC on how to set up the debate.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
6. Not "some" instructions, but totally explicit instructions, a la Monty Python
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 09:44 AM
Oct 2015

Four shall be the number of third-way, MSM, anti-progressive panelists questioning the candidates. I sayeth four, no more, no less. Four shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be four. Five shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, nor three, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Five is right out. Once the number four, being the fourth number, be reached, then thou lobbest soft-ball, pre-approved questions to Hillary and gotcha questions to Bernie.

And then there are Hillary's typical requirements for speaking engagements, because those $250,000/$300,000 fees just aren't enough, ya know.

Clinton’s typical speaking contract, stipulations that often include a chartered private jet “e.g., a Gulfstream 450 or larger jet”; a presidential suite at hotels; and business- or first-class seats for aides to the potential 2016 presidential candidate.

Clinton’s speaking arrangements also usually include a $500 stipend for a traveling aide and funds for ground transportation and cellphone bills, among other pricey requirements.

Clinton typically charges $300,000. Beyond the expenses, the report also highlights other speaking requirements for the event, including that Clinton be the “only person onstage during her remarks” and have “final approval” of the moderator and the person doing the introduction.

The contract also emphasizes that the event should be closed to the press, “unless otherwise agreed to in writing,” and that any journalists in attendance as guests need to be cleared by the agency.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/hillary-clinton-speaking-contracts-110120#ixzz3oGYEgnSu

Re: her paid appearance at UCLA:
The documents show that Clinton’s representatives at the Harry Walker Agency exerted considerable control over her appearance and managed even the smallest details — from requesting lemon wedges and water on stage to a computer, scanner, and a spread of hummus and crudité in the green room backstage.

Top university officials discussed at length the style and color of the executive armchairs Clinton and moderator Lynn Vavreck would sit in as they carried on a question-and-answer session, as well as the kind of pillows to be situated on each chair. Clinton’s representatives requested that the chairs be outfitted with two long, rectangular pillows — and that two cushions be kept backstage in case the chair was too deep and she needed additional back support.

After a lengthy call with a Clinton representative, UCLA administrator Patricia Lippert reported to campus colleagues, “She uses a lavalier [microphone] and will both speak from the audience and walk around stage, TED talk style. We need a teleprompter and 2-3 downstage scrolling monitors [for] her to read from.”

During a walk-through of Royce Hall five days before the lecture, the e-mails show, Clinton’s team rejected the podium planned for her use during her 20- to 30-minute speech, setting off a scramble on campus to find a suitable podium and rent a new university seal to match.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
5. The DWS DNC DLC Third Way Establishment Has Stacked The Deck Out Of Fear Of Voter Reprisals
Sun Oct 11, 2015, 01:30 AM
Oct 2015

Can't let the truth be known that Oligarchs, Corporations and Banks finance the show.

Response to leftcoastmountains (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»CNN’s Double-Standards on...