Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:37 AM Oct 2015

Well, the NYTimes is in the bag...and in the wrong!

Who Won and Lost the Democratic Debate? The Web Has Its Say By ALAN RAPPEPORT

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/15/us/politics/democratic-debate-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-biden.html

Bloggers, commentators and the Twitterati quickly weighed in on the first Democratic debate, scoring the winners and losers. Hillary Rodham Clinton was the clear victor, according to the opinion shapers in the political world (even conservative commentators).

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont won some points for his integrity, while the others — Martin O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland; Jim Webb, the former senator from Virginia and secretary of the Navy; and Lincoln Chafee, the former Rhode Island governor and senator — were mostly viewed as having missed their chance.

Some suggested that another loser was the man still deciding on a run, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., as Mrs. Clinton appeared to be formidable. Others disagreed.

“I’m still amazed the other four candidates made Hillary Clinton come off as the likable, reasonable, responsible Democrat.” — Erick Erickson, the conservative radio host

“Hillary Clinton won. She won because she’s a strong debater. She won because Bernie Sanders is not. She won because the first Democratic presidential debate focused on liberal policies — and not her email scandal or character.” — Ron Fournier, The National Journal

Everyone onstage at Tuesday night’s debate had something to prove.

“One impression from Tuesday night’s Democratic debate: Vice President Joe Biden has no rationale to step into the race. If he’s been waiting until after this first prime-time test to see if Hillary Clinton collapsed, he must have seen for himself that she crushed it.” — Fred Kaplan, an author who writes about military issues and policy for Slate

“Hillary was (astonishingly) much more likable and personable than everyone’s favorite crazy socialist uncle. She had few to no cringe-inducing moments. She deftly threw red meat to the base when presented with the opportunity without saying anything that would hurt her in the general.” — Leon H. Wolf, Red State, a conservative blog

“It was, without question, the climax of the debate. Hillary Clinton was defending herself against email allegations, when Bernie Sanders came to her rescue. In doing so, he not only demonstrated the decency that is the hallmark of his campaign, but also proved that he’s no ordinary politician.” — Brian Hanley, The Huffington Post

“Hillary Clinton won because all of her opponents are terrible.” — Ryan Lizza, The New Yorker

“The former governor of Maryland needed a moment in this debate to break out of the 1 percent crowd. He didn’t get one. Oddly, O’Malley sounded the most like a politician of anyone on the stage even though he is the only one who has never spent any time in office in the nation’s Capitol.” — Chris Cillizza, The Washington Post

“Intense and brooding. Had trouble getting in the mix or finding a resonant voice on issues, even in his foreign policy wheelhouse. Frequently expressed frustration about a lack of talk time, coming across as griping and grumpy.” — Mark Halperin, Bloomberg Politics, labeling Mr. Webb the debate’s biggest loser

“Perhaps the biggest loser was the man who was not there — Vice President Joe Biden. While his draft committee ran a powerful ad showing the person and his values in Mr. Biden’s own voice, the fact is that Mrs. Clinton was just commanding tonight. Mr. Biden has to decide now and not kick the can down the road because of deadlines. I don’t see how he chooses to run now.” — John Zogby, the pollster, who writes at Forbes

“There is a very real opportunity for Joe Biden to enter the race after this first debate. Just like respondents in last night’s pre-debate focus group, people were deeply affected by Draft Biden’s emotional ad urging Biden to run. After watching the ad, 20 people indicated that it made them want Biden to run — just after seeing the ad.” — Chris Kofinis, whose company, Park Street Strategies, conducted a focus group of 39 undecided Iowa Democrats

“Cruel to say but true, Chafee’s ‘I’d just been appointed to my dad’s Senate seat, I was confused’ answer will join ranks of disastrous replies.” — James Fallows, The Atlantic

Hillary Clinton Turns Up Heat on Bernie Sanders in a Sharp Debate

By MICHAEL BARBARO and AMY CHOZICK


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/us/politics/hillary-clinton-turns-up-heat-on-bernie-sanders-in-a-sharp-debate.html

Hillary Rodham Clinton, seeking to halt the momentum of her insurgent challenger, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, aggressively questioned his values, positions and voting history Tuesday night in the first Democratic presidential debate, turning a showdown that had been expected to scrutinize her character into a forceful critique of his record.

In a series of sometimes biting exchanges, Mrs. Clinton declared that Mr. Sanders was mistaken in his handling of crucial votes on gun control and misguided in his grasp of the essentialness of capitalism to the American identity. Mocking Mr. Sanders’s admiration for the health care system of Denmark, she interrupted a moderator to offer a stinging assessment of his logic, suggesting he was unprepared to grapple with the realities of governing a superpower.

“We are not Denmark,” Mrs. Clinton said, adding with a sly smile, “I love Denmark. We are the United States of America.”

The crowd erupted in applause...


HAS ANYONE COUNTED THE AUDIENCE APPLAUSE? I THINK BERNIE WON THAT HANDS DOWN....AND HILLARY TRYING TO HANG BERNIE ON GUNS IS STUPID. SHE'S TRYING TO CHIP AWAY AT HIS LEFT, AND HE'S EATING THE ENTIRE AMERICAN BUFFET RIGHT BEFORE HER EYES!

Hillary Clinton’s Democratic Debate Magic FRANK BRUNI

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/opinion/hillary-clintons-democratic-debate-magic.html

I never doubted that Hillary Clinton had many talents.

I just didn’t know that seamstress was among them.

There were moments in the first Democratic presidential debate on Tuesday night when she threaded the needle as delicately and perfectly as a politician could.

The debate’s moderator, Anderson Cooper, noted that she’d told some audiences that she was a progressive but extolled her moderation in front of others. Wasn’t she just a chameleon, flashing whatever colors suited her at a given moment?

“I’m a progressive, but I’m a progressive who likes to get things done,” she said strongly but not stridently. “I know how to find common ground and I know how to stand my ground.” It was a practiced line — so practiced that she used it, somewhat awkwardly, a second time an hour later. But it was also a well-crafted line.

Like her main rival onstage, Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, she had complaints about our country. Unlike Sanders, she communicated an unshakable pride in it nonetheless.

Sanders said America should look to Denmark. Clinton countered: “We are not Denmark. I love Denmark. We are the United States of America.”

Even when she was confronted anew by her vote in the Senate long ago to authorize the invasion of Iraq, she was neither defiant nor apologetic, steering a smooth midcourse by recalling that at debates in 2008, Barack Obama had attacked her for that. “After the election,” she pointed out, “he asked me to become secretary of state. He valued my judgment.”

The subject of Iraq caused her less grief than Sanders suffered on gun control, when not only Clinton but also Martin O’Malley, the former Maryland governor, rejected his explanation of votes in the Senate against various bills and his insistence that he was representing rural areas with gun cultures, not a nationwide electorate. It was clumsy because he presents himself as a creature of pure principle, immune to political convenience.

But on Tuesday night an odd sort of role reversal occurred. For much of the debate, Sanders somehow came across as the embattled incumbent, targeted by the other four candidates, while Clinton came across as the energetic upstart.

He seemed bowed, irascible. She seemed buoyant, effervescent. It was as poised a performance as she’s finessed in a long time, and while I’ve just about given up making predictions about this confounding election — I never thought Donald Trump would last so long, and I never saw Ben Carson coming — I think Clinton benefited more from Tuesday’s stage than Sanders did...

BETTER TURN ON YOUR BS METER, FRANK


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well, the NYTimes is in the bag...and in the wrong! (Original Post) Demeter Oct 2015 OP
Similar message from everyone on Morning Joe. However, within 4 hours of the merrily Oct 2015 #1
And by the end of the day... ReRe Oct 2015 #4
That's actually a very clever (and misleading) segue. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #2
And, maybe OT, why the heck does everyone say 'Denmark is a small country'? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2015 #3
It's really about racism. JDPriestly Oct 2015 #5
They just want to create an argument out of thin air. It's all they have. Enthusiast Oct 2015 #6
IMHO... ReRe Oct 2015 #7

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. Similar message from everyone on Morning Joe. However, within 4 hours of the
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:47 AM
Oct 2015
start of the debate, Bernie raised well over $1 million dollars.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
4. And by the end of the day...
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 08:05 AM
Oct 2015

... I predict that amount will have doubled, tripled or quadrupled.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
2. That's actually a very clever (and misleading) segue.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:57 AM
Oct 2015

They didn't actually tell you just who the 'bloggers, commentators and the Twitterati' considered winners and losers, but instead went on to tell you who "opinion shapers" and conservatives thought won.

And the fact that Hillary won with conservatives tells you where her policies fall on the political spectrum.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. And, maybe OT, why the heck does everyone say 'Denmark is a small country'?
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 07:59 AM
Oct 2015

Why does the size of a country have anything to do with whether or not socialism or capitalism will work better or worse in that country? I've seen that 'size' comment pop up multiple times, but is it anything but a non sequitur? Where did the notion that socialism only works in 'small' countries come from? And on what basis do they make such claims?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. It's really about racism.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 08:11 AM
Oct 2015

We are a diverse country. Denmark is, in the eyes of the pundits, a country of mostly, almost entirely very white people.

Socialism would not work here, the pundits think, because --- Black and Brown people would want a fair share.

Horrors! The pundits can't envision real equality. They don't want a country in which race is no issue.

China is much larger than we are. It's not our size that is a problem. It's our racism.

That's why we can't have healthcare for all or a living wage for everyone or remove the cap on Social Security taxes or free state colleges.

Because "those people" would get something too. Can't have that you know.

It's simply a euphemism for racism -- Denmark is a small country. It means Denmark is a white country (or so they think anyway).

The negativity is just racism.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
6. They just want to create an argument out of thin air. It's all they have.
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 08:11 AM
Oct 2015

We know the size of the country has no bearing on the effectiveness of socialist programs.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
7. IMHO...
Wed Oct 14, 2015, 08:16 AM
Oct 2015

... I think the reason is because of that fictional exaggeration in the minds of the "USA, USA, USA!" group, the one that I first heard spoken from the lips of Chris Matthews, that we are an "EXCEPTIONAL NATION."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Well, the NYTimes is in t...