Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 07:32 AM Nov 2015

Sanders Campaign Argues Green Group Betrayed Own Metrics To Back Clinton

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/11/10/sanders-campaign-argues-green-group-betrayed-own-metrics-back-clinton

"Bernie's record on the environment is unbeatable," said Sanders' spokesperson Michael Briggs. "He has a 95 percent lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters." Sanders has already won a number of significant environmental endorsements, including from fellow Vermonter and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben as well as Friends of the Earth.

In contrast, Briggs observed that the League only "agreed with former Sen. Clinton 82 percent of the time," adding that the endorsement is likely "based on something other than the merits."

National Journal reporter Ben Geman notes that LCV has close ties to the Demo­crat­ic es­tab­lish­ment. "It’s board chair­wo­man, Car­ol Brown­er, formerly served as a top cli­mate-change of­fi­cial in Pres­id­ent Obama’s White House and ran the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency un­der Pres­id­ent Bill Clin­ton," Geman writes. Also, Clinton's cam­paign chair­man John Podesta is a former LCV board mem­ber.

Other environmentalists were equally quick to criticize the decision in light of Clinton's environmental record.

Blogger Brad Johnson tweeted that the group had chosen to back the Democratic candidate "with the weakest climate agenda," pointing to her historic support of fracking as well as the millions Big Oil has donated to the Clinton Foundation.

Similarly, the former Secretary of State's opposition to the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline came years after Sanders came out against the project—following a trend of Clinton following his lead on a number of progressive issues.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders Campaign Argues Green Group Betrayed Own Metrics To Back Clinton (Original Post) eridani Nov 2015 OP
I'm sure her foundation will suitably reward them Demeter Nov 2015 #1
I sent them an email the day they did this. in_cog_ni_to Nov 2015 #2
Sunlight reveals mold at conservation group... nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2015 #3
Be advised: Big Green was co-opted long ago. truebluegreen Nov 2015 #4
Big Green Whores Admiral Loinpresser Nov 2015 #5
Yup. nt truebluegreen Nov 2015 #6
That's exactly why I refuse to donate to national environmental groups unless they have-- eridani Nov 2015 #12
These groups have nothing to lose by supporting Clinton.. frylock Nov 2015 #7
^this^ Hiraeth Nov 2015 #9
the Clinton campaign is targeted at the people who DON'T do the digging MisterP Nov 2015 #8
Good Points... KoKo Nov 2015 #14
Fear of reprisals if they don't. DamnYankeeInHouston Nov 2015 #10
K&R azmom Nov 2015 #11
It's fine to say Bernie has been great on the environment, but I see no value in naming merrily Nov 2015 #13
Yes there is. I've donated to them before. Never again n/t eridani Nov 2015 #15
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. I'm sure her foundation will suitably reward them
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 07:37 AM
Nov 2015

Follow the money...and the woman with the money

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
2. I sent them an email the day they did this.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 08:26 AM
Nov 2015

They will NEVER get a dime from me because, obviously, conservation/environment is not their top priority. If it was, Bernie would have received their endorsement. Some groups are being exposed as not representing what they say they do. DNC, LCV and Some Union leaders have shown their true colors.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
4. Be advised: Big Green was co-opted long ago.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 10:09 AM
Nov 2015

Many of the largest groups are in bed with fossil fuel contributors who thereby greenwash their own images.

As always, money talks.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
12. That's exactly why I refuse to donate to national environmental groups unless they have--
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 04:25 AM
Nov 2015

--active local chapters.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
7. These groups have nothing to lose by supporting Clinton..
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 02:29 PM
Nov 2015

if she doesn't win the nomination, they'll move right over to Sanders, who will welcome them with open arms. Conversely, if these groups were to endorse Sanders, and Clinton were to win the nomination, they know that she will freeze them out.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
8. the Clinton campaign is targeted at the people who DON'T do the digging
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 03:22 PM
Nov 2015

in fact, digging at all is framed as some nitpicky, overdefensive, "fragile" move

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. Good Points...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:22 AM
Nov 2015

Don't do the digging and despise those who do...because it shows them up for the corporatist apologists they are.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
13. It's fine to say Bernie has been great on the environment, but I see no value in naming
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 08:04 AM
Nov 2015

an endorsement that went elsewhere.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Sanders Campaign Argues G...