Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’s ‘College for All’ Plan Is Fair, Smart and Achievable
Of all the candidates, only Sanders proposes an alternative to the neoliberal model of higher ed.
By Heather Gautney andAdolph Reed Jr.
It is hardly news that higher education has become increasingly difficult to access for more than three decades in this country. The proximate causes also are well known: escalating costs, stagnant incomes, and a shift away from federal grants to marketized student loans. This problem has long since reached crisis proportions for many people. Some are deterred from even considering a college education. Those who do graduate are often saddled with crippling debt. Moreover, concerns about cost and debt often distort selection of programs of study, undermine completion, and encourage elaborate strategizingincluding attending multiple institutionsto minimize costs.
The neoliberal fantasy that it is possible to do more with less has both driven and obscured the deeper source of this problem, i.e., the steady retreat from the principle that providing for the general welfare, including a baseline of services that enable all members of the society to realize their human capacities, is a fundamental role of government and should be among its highest priorities. That principle has given way before a steady bipartisan assault on public goods of all sorts. Public higher education has become particularly vulnerable to this juggernaut in the aftermath of the Great Recession as state governments have invoked fiscal stress to justify often draconian cuts in funding for public colleges and universities.
The 2016 presidential campaign presents an important occasion to focus attention on the crisis in access to higher education. Bernie Sanderss social agenda, and his College for All Act in particular, make a powerful statement about the centrality of higher education as a public goodor as he puts it, a right, not a privilege.
Sanderss plan would eliminate undergraduate tuition at four-year public colleges and universities. It would also take serious steps to relieve and reverse the burden of student-loan debt by enabling borrowers to refinance their loans and by cutting interest rates for undergraduate students almost in half.
more
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanderss-college-for-all-plan-is-fair-smart-and-achievable/
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Misanthropic Sycophant Monsters .
n2doc
(47,953 posts)I am not surprised at all by them marginalizing Sanders. I wish people would realize that the media is biased, but not in a 'liberal' fashion.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)commercial .
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Or some other bullshit.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Then I am fine with it. I think the neoliberal model of targeting narrow groups for benefits is stupid and wrong. If you are paying for something, you should be able to benefit if the need is there.
Of course, some folks (cough HRC cough) just love to play that game.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)it is really a great idea.
merrily
(45,251 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)degree is equivalent to a K-12 degree of the past. A lot of it has to do with the quality of cost-ridden underfundunding, squabbles over unions and other social difficulties. But again Pre=K to 16 puts us about even with 50 years ago.
merrily
(45,251 posts)which is exactly how neocons like it. An educated America is a liberal America, an America that demands its fair share.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)and has been a work in progress. Current public, secular, equal education ... for the most part, dates back to John Dewey.
"The first colonial public schools bore little resemblance to our modern system. At first, only boys attended these institutions, and their coursework seldom went further than what today we would call a grammar school curriculum. Throughout the 17th century, only women whose families were wealthy enough received formal private educations. The education of poor women was typically limited to whatever they picked up at home. - See more at: http://www.educationnews.org/education-policy-and-politics/american-public-education-an-origin-story/#sthash.hegOTVio.dpuf "-
---------------------------------
"Part and parcel with homogenizing the public schools was the effort to ensure that all eligible children were present for instruction. As a result, compulsory attendance laws were passed beginning in 1852. And by 1918, compulsory attendance through elementary school was the law in each of the (then) 48 states. - See more at: http://www.educationnews.org/education-policy-and-politics/american-public-education-an-origin-story/#sthash.hegOTVio.dpuf"
---------------------------------------
John Dewey (1859-1952)
John Dewey was the most significant educational thinker of his era and, many would argue, of the 20th century. As a philosopher, social reformer and educator, he changed fundamental approaches to teaching and learning. His ideas about education sprang from a philosophy of pragmatism and were central to the Progressive Movement in schooling. In light of his importance, it is ironic that many of his theories have been relatively poorly understood and haphazardly applied over the past hundred years.
http://www.pbs.org/onlyateacher/john.html
A coincidence...He was born in Burlington, VT
Not every question can be neatly rebutted in one sentence.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I said the colonials established free public education. This is true. I did not say it was in the same form that we know today. I said nothing about compulsory or gender or anything of the kind.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,211 posts)I realize that community colleges are pretty affordable already, but they fill a niche that 4 year schools don't. We need people trained in the trades - welders, plumbers, electritions - as we as medical paraprofessionals.