it's Hillary or the Company. I don't believe for one minute Bernie authorized or had access to this activity. I'd be interested as to how you got the info, but probably don't care that much. Thanks for it, in any case.

I took it from a posting in GD-P.

On Edit: I love your sig line...that makes two of us...LOL

Providing evidence of a claim that went unheeded last time

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

There are a LOT of people I’d like to shut up with this nugget...TYIA.

"HFA Combined Persuasion 80-100) is the exact opposite of helpful to Sanders.
"HFA Primary Priority 9-10" is the exact opposite of helpful to Sanders.

You'd want LOW scores to find voter lists that MIGHT be worth targeting by Sanders' campaign (worth calling at that point, however, they didn't pull those lists, and low scores like could also indicate leaning Republican or voting history that was heavily Republican)

These searches do seem to back up their story that they were trying to prove to vendor (once and for all) that the breach kept happening.


edit: spelling, left out some words

The vendor has stated that what was in the summary report was not any compromising info so it was likely just a summary showing the names of the searches and where they were for followup.

this other log seems to show they had Ali Nikseresht (third entry from the bottom), a former employee of both NGP VAN and DNC, take a look at what was happening. It does show different parameters than your log, but I am not familiar with this dataset so I don't know what it means.


http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/293643104/Sanders-Campaign-Audit-Sheet-1