Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumDebbie Wasserman Schultz Is Acting Just Like the Villain Bernie Sanders Says She Is
The Sanders campaign is reacting to the DNCs incredibly punitive response as another instance of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultzs DNC treating all non-Clinton presidential campaigns unfairly and generally making a mess of the primary process. This shouldnt excuse the members of the Sanders campaign who did, in fact, screw up. The campaign should come fully clean about what proprietary Clinton campaign information they do or dont have.
But do they have a case that Wasserman Schultzs DNC has generally facilitated the Clinton campaign throughout the cycle? Oh God, yes, and its no shock that the Sanders campaign and its supporters are treating this as a declaration of war.
Saturday night the Democrats will hold their third presidential debate. Saturday night is a night during which few people watch political television because they have plans to do actual fun things. It will be the Democrats second consecutive Saturday night debate, and it lands on the first Saturday night since either the Reagan or Carter administrationsdepending on ones tolerance for Ewoksthat a decent Star Wars flick has been playing in theaters.
Its hard to see the sparse Democratic debate schedule as anything other than Wasserman Schultz protecting the interests of the Clinton campaign, which wants to eliminate the chance of its candidate getting roughed up ahead of the general election (or, you know, losing the nomination). When Wasserman Schultzs vice chairs pointed out that this is stupid, they faced retribution...much more at the link.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/12/debbie_wasserman_schultz_s_dnc_has_been_incompetent.html
I agree that the person responsible for peeking at data should have been and was fired. Beyond that I don't know what appropriate sanctions should have been. But, going beyond the sanctions Hillary's team received in 2008 is on the face of it completely unfair.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
dflprincess
(28,079 posts)given the number of times I've heard local candidates (including those for federal office) and elected officials complain about what was paid for a somewhat disappointing level of accuracy.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)But, it's interesting how much blood they want for something like this even after the appropriate response was taken vis-à-vis they fired the person who accessed the data and they reported the downed fire wall at least twice.