Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton supporters on this site are freaking ridiculous
I posted the following video in General Discussion: Primaries:
I had the following caption: If only there were another candidate with grassroots support, integrity, and that's held consistent progressive policies for decades...
Here's the link to my post: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251936365
It had 43 recs and 35 replies before it was hidden by a 4-3 vote.
Here are the results:
On Tue Dec 22, 2015, 10:09 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Hillary Clinton LIES to America
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251936365
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Highly offensive unattributed, selectively edited video attacking a Democratic candidate for President. This isn't "discussion", this is character assassination. Please hide.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Tue Dec 22, 2015, 10:16 AM, and voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Refute the points presented. Hiding doesn't serve anyone
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The video relies on the candidates own words to make it's point. You may not like it, but hiding the truth because it is inconvenient is not the solution. Leave it.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This has gone beyond the point of ridiculous. Sadly, this post will stand.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I agree. Bernie supporters are going off the deep end this week. Their candidate is so behind that they have to trash Hillary instead of getting support for bernies unrealistic g=oals.
CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DECISION
You will no longer be able to participate in this discussion thread, and you will not be able to start a new discussion thread in this forum until 11:16 AM. This hidden post has been added to your <a href="/?com=profile&uid=322650&sub=trans">Transparency page</a>.
In my view, this is a clear and partisan abuse of the "alert abuse" button. Rather than refuting my post on the merits (and Hillary Clinton's own words in the video), HRC supporters didn't want to confront it, and wanted to use authoritarian tactics to gang up and forcibly hide my post, shutting down speech and discussion on that video. They didn't want to argue, because seemingly they were unable to construct a proper rebuttal to the video, so they wanted to bury it to ensure that it wasn't seen by more people on DU.
As two jurors wrote, "refute the points presented. Hiding doesn't serve anyone," and "the video relies on the candidates own words to make it's point. You may not like it, but hiding the truth because it is inconvenient is not the solution. Leave it."
It's ridiculous how insecure some of HRC's supporters are, and how they are religious in their devotion to her, how ridiculous they react to even the slightest criticism of her consistency, record, or policy positions. I'm just very disappointed by them, and find them very immature and childish. They are extremely dogmatic, and suffer from groupthink. This was a cowardly, cowardly hide, and they should be ashamed of themselves.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)On Tue Dec 22, 2015, 10:23 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Thanks for posting. Hillary is a bald-faced liar.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=936767
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is slander. Why does it have to get so nasty?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Dec 22, 2015, 10:28 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's not slander, its an opinion. Refute it.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: grow up. stop alerting on opinions you don't like. stop abusing the alert system.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
I just served on that jury.
gobears10
(310 posts)eom.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)The HRC bunch just come across as crybabies. Since they can not refute the truth, they alert. If enough HRC zombies are on the jury, then they win. If not, they lose.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
..I do too. It's tedious and not at all what politically serious people have any time for.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It's Hillary contradicting herself time after time.
What do you think the Republicans are going to do during the general election with Hillary's record of constantly "evolving" or as most people would say, lying and lying about her positions and past positions on the issues.
Hillary cannot win in November 2016. Her record is just awful. And the Republicans have it all down.
How anyone can vote for her in the primaries is utterly beyond me. I don't understand it at all.
Ivan Kaputski
(528 posts)especially when it comes to examining pros and cons of candidates. In the case of a potential POTUS the examining should be very intense IMO.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Being dishonest comes from the top.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)Just to make sure Hillary is protected from herself
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)I guess I'd not be surprised considering the jittery frayed nerves and defensiveness of some Hillary supporters lately.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Paka
(2,760 posts)Brought a nice smile to my face.
valerief
(53,235 posts)BTW, I was one of the recs in the original OP.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Nyan
(1,192 posts)damning truth. It's a blatant display of a person selling out and becoming cynical.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Love that movie.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Ivan Kaputski
(528 posts)it is damning, and it's hillary's own words. but HRC supporters still say it's a "highly offensive unattributed, selectively edited video attacking a Democratic candidate for President. This isn't 'discussion', this is character assassination. Please hide." How ridiculous.
If they can't tolerate such mild criticism from the progressive wing of the Democratic Party base, and view this honest video as "character assassination," how the heck will HRC stand against GOP attacks, which will be 10,000 times more viscous, and actually misleading propaganda and character assassination, during the general election?
chervilant
(8,267 posts)(I don't mean that in a religious way...)
I have posted a couple of OPs that were meant to ascertain how HRC's supporters think Democrats can deflect or minimize the damages to her campaign when the Republicans start attacking her, based on these specific issues (of course, this query is posited on HRC winning the nomination, an event that seems less and less likely). I have been derided and vilified for these OPs, and not a single HRC supporter has addressed these concerns.
Please, keep posting this information. If the corporate overlords succeed in getting HRC the nomination, we'll need to be ready to counter the Republican attacks. (And, obviously, things will go from bad to worse...)
DhhD
(4,695 posts)Democrats need to face the facts.
Superdelegates are watching. They will be responsible for any candidate that faces the GOP in the GE.
Ivan Kaputski
(528 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Your use of the present participle of the verbs "sell" and "become" indicate a recent selling out and becoming cynical. I would argue that she sold out and became cynical years ago.
djean111
(14,255 posts)her own words, her own actions, her own policies and their results - as disloyal to the DNC. As if the GOP has not ever thought of any of this stuff. What a joke.
The rest of us are not supposed to care about issues. Just Hillary. Not going to happen.
Of course, it is okay for any Hillary supporter to spew shit about Bernie. Because he was not supposed to get this far, I think.
Nyan
(1,192 posts)than confront the reality.
I'm fine with people having different opinions than I, and preferring Hillary Clinton to Bernie Sanders in the primary. But that's not the issue here. It's not their beliefs, but their tactics, which I find authoritarian, cowardly, and pathetic.
That was my point. Where am I disagreeing with you?
gobears10
(310 posts)i was completely agreeing with you, and thought your comment was absolutely on point!! sorry, I just phrased my comment weirdly, I don't disagree with you at all! thanks for the support!
It's alright
Bury their heads in the sand now and she becomes the nominee they will get to watch the GOP bury her completely and we will enter another dark ages...
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)It happens.
Response to gobears10 (Original post)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #9)
mak3cats This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)There's no point trying to keep our heads in the sand on this and pretend it's not there. If she wins the primary, and she's the favorite to do so, Democrats are going to have to find a way to combat this stuff or they'll be on the losing end. Those are the harsh realities.
If you want to be a fan of hers, that's your right. Go to one of her rallies or read one of her books or look at some complimentary videos of her, etc. Don't bother with this thread.
If you want to help her win the presidency, then roll up your sleeves and weigh in on how to combat these types of attacks effectively. The Kochs will have them running around the clock.
look, none of us want a Republican in the White House. I'll roll up my sleeves, hold my nose, and vote for HRC, the lesser of two evils, in the general election, if she beats Bernie in the primary. I'd encourage others who live in swing states to do the same in the general, although those in solid blue or red states have the option of not voting for her if they don't want to.
But we need to be aware of her flaws, of which there are many, so that we can properly and effectively defend her against GOP attacks in the general election. Sweeping this under the rug and pretending her inconsistencies don't exist won't solve the problem.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Thanks for the video.
It has been added to my library.
I've had pieces of it, but THIS is a great compilation...
without opinion or commentary.
DURec!
Ivan Kaputski
(528 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Every Democrat in America ought to see it.
Clinton is a highly flawed candidate and that needs to be understood before it is too late.
Burying one's head in the sand and pretending that Mrs. Clinton doesn't have these consistency problems is a recipe for disaster in the general election if she were the nominee.
Let the Hillarians counter the points in this video instead of hiding it.
Let the Hillarians post a similar video about Sanders and/or O'Malley -- if they have these kinds of problems, I want to know that too.
Sad to say, the Hillarians on DU are much like the ones I encounter in many off-line, real life circles. For some reason they are the most snarky, intolerant, down right mean folks I have dealt with in politics for a long time.
rury
(1,021 posts)Just like the PUMAs were in 2008.
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)They alert on their candidate's own words. Okay... How is that going to work if, god forbid, she gets to the general election? Surely these statements will be fodder for her opponent.
Her candidacy has jumped the shark when her own platforms are censured by her supporters.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Either Trump or Hillary get in.
That is the only way the status quo will be able to continue - if we are coerced into accepting it.
DaveT
(687 posts)of the Hillary supporters on the internet are organized and fed instructions on a regular basis. There is nothing inherently wrong or immoral about this. But it is as creepy as hell -- as this manipulation of the board rules shows perfectly.
Our political revolution is aimed at reclaiming upwards of a trillion dollars of cash flow every year from the 1% to use by our entire society. They aren't going to let go of it easily. This is but a tiny example of what we are up against. Expect more smears and more bullshit.
This is actually good news. It means they are afraid of losing.
However, not every single Hillary supporter in the country is part of that operation. I know several in real life who don't follow the news cycles so closely, but just, generally, believe that Bernie can't win. My favorite line came from somebody I work with who said, "It would really be wonderful if we could have Bernie for President, but, come on. You know he has no chance."
That paradigm was the main Hillary supporting theme on this board until the DataSmear broke last Friday . . . .
Ino
(3,366 posts)A win in Iowa and/or NH will go a long way towards changing that kind of attitude!
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)We REALLY, REALLY don't trust her.
It seems that fact is unacceptable to some people here. They are the ones that seem to be trying to force a lot of us to have to vote for someone THAT THEY KNOW is not trusted by quite a number of us.
And, not trusting Hillary Clinton DOES NOT MEAN we are not loyal Democrats.
Period.
PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)I don't trust Hillary Clinton at all. I think she cares so much about her big corporate donors that the chances of her putting out policies that actually support ordinary Americans is pretty much nil. I really believe that, which is why I am supporting Bernie so strongly.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Hey! Why not consider becoming a star member of DU to increase your chances against bogus hides?
Seriously, the day the admins do something to put a halt to this crap is the day I write a check.
Thanks for reposting this here.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)The first is that I know a portion of my money would go to supporting Skinner's pro hillary website, and I fervently object to that.
Second, I object to the demonstrably biased use of PPRs against Bernie Sanders supporters while hillary supporters walk around free and clear, spouting similar comments and worse.
PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)I haven't gotten my 'star' either.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)That's pretty harsh.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)Response to gobears10 (Original post)
darkangel218 This message was self-deleted by its author.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)I can see why they hate it.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Thanks for re-posting it.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)And getting admins to PPR posters. It's absurd.
polichick
(37,152 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)PatrickforO
(14,593 posts)Flippety-floppety!
It brings a whole new meaning to 'money changed hands,' doesn't it?
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)MadLinguist
(790 posts)tells us that HRC supporters are in great numbers on DU, but also that they are willing like Debbie Wasserman Schultz to squelch anything that detracts from HRC's image. My guess is that it is in fact *NOT* random that it was voted to be hidden. This site is all effed up now because of crap like this. I so miss the better days of DU. I think your video should be re-posted.
Go Bears! (whoever they may be)
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)The longer she campaigns the more apparent her lack of integrity becomes. There's a reason the majority of Americans don't trust her!
retrowire
(10,345 posts)and once they hide your posts enough to get you banned, they'll dance on your grave.
Such wonderful representatives of Hillary aren't they?
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)If HRC actually makes it to the general, they're going to need us to work for her and beat the Republican. Why belittle and alienate us?
840high
(17,196 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)I know if Bernie doesn't make it then I'm certainly not gonna fight.
after all, she's inevitable right? lol
DhhD
(4,695 posts)Hillary Clinton Group? Where was the HC Group Host at on this quagmire? I must say that I did not read the Host DU Mail reason for my banning. Apparently my support or vote for HC is not as important as the rules about asking questions on DU Group as far as I can determine. I suppose that this means that I should go somewhere else to support the Democratic Nominee.
gordyfl
(598 posts)Okay, so she's flop-flopped on many very important issues. And so what if she is a corporatist centrist whose priorities are taking care of the rich and powerful. So what if she's okay with perpetual war. So what if she and her husband became filthy rich giving speeches, many of them for Wall Street bankers. We have an opportunity to elect our first "woman" president.
forsaken mortal
(112 posts)It's become fairly clear that a lot of Democrats don't really care if we have massive economic inequality, healthcare and educational systems that lock people into horrid debt, and gov't that panders mostly to the elites, etc. Hillary's solutions on such issues aren't far removed from that of a moderate Republican, she isn't going to cause any progress to happen on any of those fronts.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)nyabingi
(1,145 posts)I've had posts regarding Hillary hidden several times for being "insensitive", but I've always had the same thought you had: Tell me where you disagree and we can debate the topic instead of running to the censors, but these people can't defend Hillary in the least. I was even suspected of being a "malicious intruder" by some anonymous juror (and man, I'd really like to have a word with them!).
Now I admit my posts can be a bit venomous when I'm angry or feel strongly about something, but hey, that's what it's like when you have a difference of opinion with someone and are trying to hash it out. I would never act like a spoiled brat and run to tell Mama and Daddy if some little kid wouldn't let me play ball with them, but for Hillary's supporters, that is their only tactic. Shoot a spit ball at one of your peers, then when you're confronted about it, you run for cover behind your big, older brother. That's the Hillary group for ya.
They can't defend her policies and it angers them that their champion has put them in such a weak position.
Prism
(5,815 posts)By a Clinton supporter.
*rolls eyes*
Whatever. Going to Costco.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)This was just SOP alerted
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=88664
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
A host using his position to "out" an alerter is "disruptive" The host is intrusted to serve in a fair and impartial manner. By disclosing information that is meant for host only is a failure of that trust. It's disruptive and inappropriate.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Dec 22, 2015, 11:17 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a matter between the admins and the hosts, not something for a jury. I don't believe there's any guarantee of privacy/confidentiality in the hosts forum, either.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seems like I never know what's going on. Leave.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Or MIRT forum are not secret; people can quote/copy anything from them:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025222077
That's one of the dumbest ones yet.
N_E_1 for Tennis
(9,786 posts)When your own words bury you and people throw their hands over their ears and start singing...
How real deep is their conviction for their own choice?
Face the music and dance.
Hiding your post was turning off the music, taking the player home, looking over their shoulders and saying f&$@ you!
This is exactly why we need a political revolution. It will happen with or without Bernie Sanders.
But with him is a whole lot better.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)their failed "Data Breach OMG!!!!111111ONE111!!!!!!" attack on Sanders.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)gov't of, by and for the corporations.
In gov't of, by and for the people, they're completely obvious.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Saying the same stuff about George Washington et al that they're saying about Bernie now.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)I thought DU was a discussion group - you know, where you can present your reasons why you agree or disagree with the post. Guess not so much any more.
Glad you re-posted.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)this won't be locked. The alerter is right, I am not inclined to lock this at this time. Two other group which the alerter posts in, have OPs that are in the very same vein.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)the alerter alerted on those as well.
How do some folks sleep at night?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)outraged about.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)And they said things about her that would surely be hidden if they were said now. But they did a 180 this year and became her most vocal supporters.
QC
(26,371 posts)and called for death to that wing of the party but is now her #1 fan?
Or the one who plays the liberal tackling dummy on a right wing propaganda network who excoriated her in terms once used only for Republicans here but now believes she is the greatest thing since PB&J?
It's funny what team spirit can do to people.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I had forgotten about the "journalist", thanks for the reminder
QC
(26,371 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)Even when that truth comes directly out of the mouth of their chosen candidate.
840high
(17,196 posts)the truth about Hillary. Ignorance is bliss.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I voted to Leave It.
maq-az
(40 posts)Calling people names and attacking other Dems should get your --- kicked out.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)not someone who doesn't represent the people of the country and our needs
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Because the video is just her in her own words.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)But, having followed her record for years, I didn't believe a word coming out of her mouth.
Utopian Leftist
(534 posts)and every time I sat on one, EVERY damn time, it was a knee-jerk reactionary, Hillary supporter who did the alerting, and in EVERY case it was over NOTHING!
Such behavior makes me suspect them of existing in a sort of hive mind, which has only one track: worship the Queen Bee or perish!
dana_b
(11,546 posts)the "in" for Hillary is there. I have a real fear that she will win just because it's pre ordained. I guess most of us do.
The best thing we can do is to keep posting Bernie's words. He is the best advocate for himself.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)I've served on quite a few juries where I wish there was a way to alert the alerter for alerting.
ms liberty
(8,607 posts)MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)From years of observation, I suspect (but could be wrong) that it is dramatically higher than your average political website.
On the one hand it results in DU being "fairly" junk-free (the real vile stuff left by obvious trolls is quickly cleaned up).
On the other hand, the average DU'ers paranoia/unmitigated horror at the idea that their eyeballs (or eyeballs of their DU peers) might be exposed to an idea they disagree with, seems to result in a lot of threads with a great majority of the replies hidden. When you get to that point, what's the point anymore?
QC
(26,371 posts)I won't say whose supporters are doing it, but they would do well to clean up their own groups before complaining about anyone else's.
forsaken mortal
(112 posts)I have a feeling who might be doing it
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Purely in the interests of transparency, of course.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)They will probably alert on those posts as well. We all know who's doing the alerting anyways, not hard to guess.
forsaken mortal
(112 posts)I just got blocked from the Hillary subforum. I'm not even sure what I said since I don't remember the last time I posted in there. Oh well, Bernie all the way.
gordyfl
(598 posts)Yeah, I've noticed when you post something critical of Hillary on a Hillary subgroup, you get blocked. No more posting on that thread.
When you criticize Hillary on Bernie group, you receive an Alert Warning.
I don't like their idea of freedom of speech.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)It's HRCs very own words that provide the proof of massive deception.
They can try to hide it but they can't erase her words on video after video. And they damn sure can't stop people from sharing these videos all over the internet.
I KNOW they wish they could!
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)ruffburr
(1,190 posts)TIME TO PANIC
(1,894 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)What they neglect to realize is the level of disgust within the Party for corporate, neo-liberal, Turd Way "democrats," such as HRC.
Docreed2003
(16,878 posts)The level of absolute bile and venom spewed by some on DU in the past few months has been disturbing and honestly disheartening. Let's say Sec Clinton wins the nomination, do her supporters truly believe that all of the nastiness will be forgiven and we'll all come together and sing campfire songs in solidarity? After they all complete their victory laps and reality sets in, the Clinton camp will need all the support they can get to get out the vote. I think they are in for a rude awakening when it comes to Sec Clinton's support amongst swing voters. If she loses in the general, the left will be the scapegoat, mark my words. It won't be the flip/flops, the question of trustworthiness, or her positions. The blame will fall squarely on the left, they've already alluded to as much. There needs to be some sane discourse and quickly, or the wounds may be too great to heal. Frankly, for those of us on the left, we need to continue to focus on down ballot races to promote more liberal policies from the ground up at the same time we are promoting our chosen presidential candidates.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Could it get more twisted?
Do so many have this complete disregard for the TRUTH?
DURec
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Bernie is ahead in New Hampshire and neck-and-neck in Iowa. How is that "far behind."
Don't these people know we don't vote nationally, so a national poll measures nothing but name recognition.
tasgator
(8 posts)I guess you could ask them to call the whaaaabulance.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)DNClinton may have allowed you get away with it then. You know, like the debates.
rury
(1,021 posts)or the behavior of her rabid supporters.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)to get out during the general if she becomes the nominee. Rovian tactics combined with this?! OY!
Old Codger
(4,205 posts)It has become apparent that the truth is to be hidden as much as possible saw the same reaction on another thread... H supporters cannot stand the truth in any form...
ablamj
(333 posts)I just did
Bernblu
(441 posts)The Wizard
(12,551 posts)It serves no purpose other than to relieve the administrators from doing their jobs. It's really diminished the quality of discussion.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)That's the channel of the person who uploaded it.
The efforts to hide the truth?
May the force be with us all.
c588415
(285 posts)I have nothing against Sanders, nevertheless, most of his supporters who post on this site are a bunch of ??????????
You people are beatin a dead horse; Sanders aint gonna win. According to RealClearPolitics"poll of polls" , Hillary Clinton leads Sanders by double digits in most national polls. So to summarize, my candidate, Hillary R Clinton, the chosen one, is going to win it all
Good to have the re-post of this vid. It needs to be seen.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)This is going back into GDP
Uncle Joe
(58,444 posts)Thanks for the thread, gobears.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Because I can.
mountain grammy
(26,656 posts)because, I believe with all my heart, if she's our candidate we will lose.
bl968
(360 posts)I posted my opinions
I am going nuclear
I will not vote for Hillary, and I have said this all along, and I mean it. Hillary has been counting on the sentiment expressed in this post, that in the end people will vote for her the lesser of two evils. Well my friend that's still voting for evil. It's not happening for me and it's not happening for a lot of others.
In the event the Democratic Party and the Corporate Media's blatant manipulation of the nomination process succeeds, We will either write in our candidate or we will simply stay home. So if you don't wanna risk handing this election to the right then don't support Clinton.
A short time later I got a message stating that someone had alerted on my post..
I think you already know, but I'll say it anyway, that if you suggest others shouldn't vote for our eventual nominee, if it's Clinton, you will get banned. And a few of these Clinton supporters will chuckle in glee if they can make that happen.
On a lighter note, lol, you're now part of a very large club of people who've been alerted on for stating their convictions. Welcome to DU! (just don't let them nail you for something because you forgot they're ready to pounce) lol
I didn't post this in the thread because I have no desire to argue with those who troll. Let them boost their post count some other way. Some post just to be annoying. They want to wear you out and/or compel you to earn a hide or a banishment. They have another website that they actually organize on so as to goad Sanders supporters. So very, very, sad.
They helpfully included the text of the alert.
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Mon Dec 21, 2015, 03:36 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
I am going nuclear
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=933691
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
TOS violation. Also berates those who will vote for a democrat if their candidate doesn't win.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Dec 21, 2015, 03:49 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No, it's not a TOS violation (as it gets applied) and The Management very recently explained how they apply it during primary season. It boils down to "don't tell other people not to vote for our party's choice". The post in question here did not do that. The post says "So if you don't wanna risk handing this election to the right then don't support Clinton." That refers to the primaries. The poster strongly suggest that they won't consider voting for Clinton in the general election. The management here says that they consider that as being hyperbole, if said during the primary season. Once one of our candidates is the nominee, you no longer can say you won't vote for the nominee. Since The Management, from its lofty height , sees this as hyperbole, I won't vote to hide it.
P.S. "Also berates those who will vote for a democrat if their candidate doesn't win." No, it doesn't. It does state a truism that I think the alerter took for such.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Primary season. There is no general election Democratic candidate for president yet.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Bye
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
People are using the jury system as a weapon, to censor the debate, and something needs to be done. In my case the system worked, but in many others it doesn't. Staff need to review every jury decision and exercise a meta moderation ability punishing people who are clearly abusing the system as a weapon to stifle dissent. Both those who report the messages improperly, and those who use their service on the system to impose a ideology in opposition to the rules and policies of Democratic Underground.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)What stops the Republicans from running this video non stop?
daybranch
(1,309 posts)to describe Bernie supporters who will not kowtow to their greatly presumed political knowledge. Do they even realize how they are supporting a damaging female stereotype in an attempt to support a female candidate. Hillary people display like republicans a cognitive dissonance in this instance.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)after the last debate, admitting 'we could lose this' and asking for donations as small as one dollar, lol, trying to get as many individual donors as they can to make it look like they have as much support from ordinary people as Bernie.
But yes, that campaign is in big trouble and they know it. Thus the reaction to facts that are very inconvenient.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)as a Republican light candidate. Her husband was the best Republican president we've ever had (despite the D next to his name). She, unfortunately, will not be as great.
eridani
(51,907 posts)We should be doing analysis of particulars for all three campaigns.
paleotn
(17,989 posts)the truth means nothing to those people. I'm getting so tired of their hateful, petty bullshit.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)CrispyQ
(36,533 posts)I guess it's par for the course of primary season, but it sucks.
gobears10
(310 posts)if someone provides me an example of Bernie supporters abusing the shit out of the alert system to deliberately censor others. So far, I've only seen Hillary fans do it (and they've done it repeatedly).
CrispyQ
(36,533 posts)I do know, just from reading DU, that there are plenty of nasty posts from both groups.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Ivan Kaputski
(528 posts)You know they will use stuff like that to defeat her.