Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumNed_Devine
(3,146 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)People can stick their heads in the sand, but that doesn't rehab Hilary in any way.
She will ALWAYS be what she has always been....a Union Busting Executive at Walmart.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The night of the Iowa caucuses, after Bernie tears it down!
It's going to be a beautiful win.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)For I know
She would encumber me
She's so heavy, she's not my sister.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)Put war hawk in there somewhere and you've got it.
unblock
(52,289 posts)ok, if you're going to rail on hillary, best to do it properly.
why would you characterize her as a puppet who (not "that"; "that" is for inanimate objects, not human beings) will do anything her handlers instruct her to?
why not give her credit for making the decision to advance policies in the interests of her corporate sponsors?
in short, in arguing against the sexism argument, you've described her as an inanimate object taking orders from others.
impressive.
yuiyoshida
(41,835 posts)OMG, her hubris has no bounds...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128090045
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This does nothing to advance the campaign of Bernie Sanders, all this post does is smear a current democrat running for the national nomination. I get that this is the Sanders group, but it sure seems like the "bash Clinton" group. This kind of hatred needs to stop, don't like Clinton? Don't support her, that's what the primary is for. Stop smearing democrats, and yes to the inevitable juror who will say "this isn't a smear, it's just the facts" you are wrong here, this is a meme and it's just a blatant smear job. This is over the top, and it's getting old. This is NOT the way to support Bernie, which as I understand is the purpose of this group. Please hide this post.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Dec 25, 2015, 07:03 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I almost left this as being part of the Sanders group, but it really doesn't have any redeeming value at a Democratic site. There are plenty of reasons to vote for or against Clinton that are based on specifics not just this sort of over the top silliness.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This IS the Sanders group, and as far as I know, the Democratic party's candidate hasn't yet been determined. My understanding is that candidates are fair game until we have a nominee. Let it stay.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with the alert, really strong words intended to make inflame and without any promotion of candidates
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
senz
(11,945 posts)for not supporting her on the grounds that she's a Democrat and therefore beyond criticism. This is unreasonable. We have a right to discuss the pros and cons of the candidates.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The jury outcome on that one was close, but honestly it should have been 0-7 since this is a closed group.
yuiyoshida
(41,835 posts)some people have nothing better to do than stalk alert.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom