repeating reichwing headlines, even if the intent is to destroy the premise. I'm feeling grumpy today, not my usual tolerant self.

and is doing solid in the polls. From what I am seeing she is being given a very solid look by people.

I really don't see any articles blaming others for her position. Nevertheless, she persists.

That too, is directly relevant vis-a-vis the overall context.

Meanwhile, on “Meet the Press,” Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) was spared the electability inquisition and allowed to make a critical point about many of her and Biden’s opponents:

She continued to make the case for more centrist policies. “There’re a lot of people making promises. And I’m not going to make promises just to get elected,” she said of her opponents. “I am not running for chair of the Democratic National Committee. I am running for president of the United States. And that means you bring people together. And you find that common ground in our own party.”

She ticked through her “bold” plans: “I want to double the Pell Grant. That’ll help so many kids when you go up to $12,000 a year, double the eligibility up to $100,000 a family, where you can actually get those grants. I want to move forward with a public option and finally take on the pharmaceutical companies that are boosting up the cost of insulin so regular people can’t even afford it.” She underscored that “what’s most important to the people of America is we actually get those things done.” In other words, if you’re to the left of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, how do you win the presidency? That might be a good question to start asking the progressive candidates about their elaborate plans.

That shows promise — an interview in which a female candidate is treated as a candidate without a modifier (female, black, gay, etc.), not like a unicorn in a herd of stallions.