I started out liking Bullock but lately the rules whining has turned me off.

is by no means a johnny-come-lately to Dem activism.

It was Steyer who in the dark days led the impeachment charge with ads, billboards, etc.

Steyer also formed several organizations to help mobilize votes for the Blue Wave in 2018.

If Steyer (who is sharp/tough/articulate) had entered the race earlier, he undoubtedly would've had more than enough 'real' donations and polling to be in all of the debates.

what he did is not difficult with the money he has.

many other people do the same thing but they have less money but they give as much or if not more when you take into account what percentage of time and money they give based on how much they have.

will find out that just saying "do it" does not cut it.

He’s a potentially attractive national candidate with low name recognition who started way too late and would now be much better off running for the Senate.

There are too many candidates. Next time around I would set the polling threshold higher for the third debate.

start running earlier for the exact reason he would be a good president.

He’s 53. Still a baby by current counting methods.

we will have more attention whores next time around .

Rich people do that... BTW I can’t stand Scott...
M

in a crowded field of more qualified people.

He got 6 one-dollar donations from my family and then a larger one. Steyer serves me very well. Bullock can go find an empty space in Montana and whine about it there. I would rather have Steyer at the debate than Bullock.

Nobody was forced to donate. And nobody was forced to tell pollsters that they planned on voting for him.

I like Steyer a lot and look forward to hearing more from him.

I had been planning on supporting him in 2018, and I still might. Right now I am looking for a candidate who discusses a plan to deal with the assault on democracy coming from the Supreme Court.

a demonstration of grassroots support," Bullock said. "It’s not serving the candidates, and it sure isn’t helping the voters who will actually decide this election."

+10,000 to that. Steyer and his anti-democratic methods disgust me.

The irony of a billionaire who's decided to seek power as a populist leader buying himself onto the Democratic debate stage should be gobsmacking. However, research revealed that those vulnerable to populist resentments against elites actually prefer leaders from those elites who are seen as "outsiders."

That's right. If you're a billionaire with a big ego whose neighbors won't invite you to their parties, you too may have what it takes to convince a hoard of people to follow you around screaming your name. Just hire a firm to make it happen and commit to making some appearances.

So, Steyer's coming for Sanders supporters. Is HE what's causing Sanders to push conspiracy theories against himself then? Trying to draw his closer?

I look forward to Tom Steyer's participation.