become worthless, can’t be transferred legally, then they should just have to absorb the loss and heavy fines if caught with one after a ban.

If a buyback is necessary to get ban enacted, I’d reluctantly pay my share.

Would also like to see restrictions on public toting.

kick

I do think limits also need to be installed that you can buy no more than 1 gun per year (every 3 years?) and limit the ammo as well. Shooting ranges could always supply bullets needed for target practice. Killers often buy up quite a bit of ammo & guns in the months prior to their rampage - this would stop lots of deaths.

The premiums from that insurance should go into a victim's fund to pay the catastrophic medical costs of shooting victims. Right now, the taxpayer is paying the bulk of uncompensated care for gunshot victims.

https://www.thetrace.org/2017/08/gunshot-victims-health-care-costs-private-insurance/

It would satisfy 2A which contains no language specifically stating what kind of arms citizens are allowed to bear.

But those weapons do satisfy 2a. Where does it say in the second amendment how many and what kind of precious you can own?

So, while we at it, let’s apply tech limits throughout.

if a bit of an idealist. But all ideas ought to be on the table to start.

A well-regulated militia is disciplined, and prepared for national defense. I think the Founders meant something akin to Colonial Militiamen - Continentals. That's how we fought the revolution, a regular army and a home guard auxiliary. Today's assault rifles aid national defense very little if at all. National Guard I understand, that is well-regulated, disciplined.

Anarchy is not well-regulated.