Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

question everything

(47,531 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 12:19 PM Aug 2019

Iowa and New Hampshire: who's on first?

Heard a long story about Iowa wanting to move to "virtual caucus" because - surprise surprise - not many people these days are excited about shuffling on a cold winter night, perhaps even snowy or icy, to participate. Never mind exposing their preferences in front of other family members, neighbors, perhaps even bosses and co-workers.

But, of course, there are concerns about hacking. So why not move to a primary system? Because New Hampshire, which comes next, is the first state in the nation to cast a primary. So there.





If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iowa and New Hampshire: who's on first? (Original Post) question everything Aug 2019 OP
NH have passed a law to that effect. crazytown Aug 2019 #1
In 2012, NH was threatening to move their Primary to December 2011 to "protect" it brooklynite Aug 2019 #2
Yes they were. The were pushing back in 2008 too, crazytown Aug 2019 #3
But it should not bind other states question everything Aug 2019 #4
If it has been anyone else but Obama crazytown Aug 2019 #5
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
1. NH have passed a law to that effect.
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 12:26 PM
Aug 2019

If Iowa had not used a caucus system, Obama might not have won - HRC would have been 44 in that case.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brooklynite

(94,725 posts)
2. In 2012, NH was threatening to move their Primary to December 2011 to "protect" it
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 02:28 PM
Aug 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
3. Yes they were. The were pushing back in 2008 too,
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 03:33 PM
Aug 2019

which is why Iowa was held on the night of January 3- and that gave Obama the most best opportunity to capitalize on his win.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

question everything

(47,531 posts)
4. But it should not bind other states
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 04:38 PM
Aug 2019

I kinda remember Florida, and, perhaps Michigan, decided to move forward and were punished by cutting the number of their delegates. Of course, once we had a nominee they were forgiven.

The only way to handle this is by having a rotating regional primaries system.

Which, of course, will deprive these four early states of major income...


If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
5. If it has been anyone else but Obama
Fri Aug 30, 2019, 05:16 PM
Aug 2019

No other post WWII Democrat could have beaten HRC in 2008. No one of them.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Iowa and New Hampshire: w...