Or is she going to force MZ to break up FB forums topically by pets, cooking and crafts, politics or small businesses?

I don't see how he's got a monopoly. Just a communications service that exists among others, but was first-to-market, and so is the biggest, globally. People loved it back 12 years ago, and that's why it blew up.

It's communications -- a necessity for many families, faraway friends; and for small business people, just to promote their services and business, -- it's networking, ad buy for third parties; it's algorithm responses to the two. To break that up is to hurt community and local economies, imo.

She sounds tough but I'm not sure, once she looks at the structure, what kind of legislation could change it without harm to customers, or users (who are the third parties), us customers being the most vulnerable.

At least FB has a non-moderated candidate policy, and wants to encrypt end-to-end, to stop global interference in discussions. That's to his credit.

Are FB and Google so similar that her plan could apply to Google or other Silicon Valley giants? Doubtful on both counts.

Or does the REAL badbad guy, Google, get a pass. And why should it. It controls the information economy and is THE single greatest surveillance apparatus that exists.

I believe him as much as I believe Putin when he says Trump did not do exactly what tRump did ALL DAY yesterday.