Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

highplainsdem

(48,987 posts)
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 08:07 AM Oct 2019

It's No Coincidence That the Top Presidential Candidates Are All So Old

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/10/old-age-limit-presidency-bernie-sanders-health-warren-trump-biden/


Short of sharing a full genetic sequencing, Barzilai says that family history is a pretty good predictive factor. That bodes well for Trump, Warren, and Biden, whose parents all lived well into their 80s. But then what to make of Sanders, who has already outlived both of his parents by several decades (and is expected to make a full recovery from his heart attack)? Barzilai acknowledges it’s not just about genes; social and environmental circumstances also help determine how long and how well a person lives.

Indeed, I found out that more powerful predictors of both longevity and cognitive stability even than genetics are three external factors: education, race, and wealth. Countless studies have found a correlation between income level and lifespan; a 2016 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, for example, found that on average, the richest 1 percent of American men live 14.6 years longer than the poorest 1 percent; for women the difference is 10.1 years. That’s not surprising: Being wealthy means you have access to good health care and good control over your diet and exercise.

Relatedly, level of education matters, too—and even more so along racial lines. In 2012, University of Illinois at Chicago gerontologist and public health researcher Stuart Jay Olshansky sorted deaths in the United States by age, race, and number of years of schooling. He found that on average, black men who hadn’t finished high school lived 14.2 years less than white men who had completed 16 or more years of education; for women that figure was 10.3 years. (It’s important to note that these racial differences probably have to do with lack of opportunity for African Americans, not any biological difference.)

Education also seems to have a strong protective effect against dementia: A 2018 University of Southern California study found that most people who have graduated from college can expect to prevent cognitive decline into their 80s, while people with a high school education often begin to experience it in their 70s. It’s not that education actually prevents the changes in the brain associated with dementia, explained Joe Verghese, another Albert Einstein gerontologist. Rather, education seems to help people compensate for those changes. “The theory is that people who are highly educated and intellectually engaged will be able to stave off the effects of this disease,” he said.

When you consider these external factors, good genes don’t seem as important. All of the presidential candidates are wealthy; all are exceptionally well educated. Take Sanders: It’s valid to speculate that perhaps one reason he has lived so much longer than his parents is that he has a college degree and robust finances, while his parents were poor immigrants who worked all their lives.

-snip-

In this country, the same set of extreme social privileges that propel someone to the position of frontrunner presidential candidate also protect against the typical ravages of old age. And that single fact, for better or worse, is a stronger predictor of candidates’ health than any senior-moment gaffe they might have over the coming months. “It’s entirely possible,” Olshansky told me, “that some of these folks running for president are super-agers.” We should all be so lucky.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's No Coincidence That the Top Presidential Candidates Are All So Old (Original Post) highplainsdem Oct 2019 OP
The only reason that the three polling leaders are all over 70 lapfog_1 Oct 2019 #1
Mayor Pete is catching fire. MrsCoffee Oct 2019 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author lapfog_1 Oct 2019 #1
Interesting read! Thx highplainsdem for posting Thekaspervote Oct 2019 #4
age and wisdom, why the indian chiefs were also the elders beachbumbob Oct 2019 #5
 

lapfog_1

(29,205 posts)
1. The only reason that the three polling leaders are all over 70
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 08:18 AM
Oct 2019

is that none of the rest of the field have managed to "catch fire". Not Booker or Harris or Beto or Mayor Pete.

I had hoped that one of them would... but no, not so far.

So I support the one that has the best chance to beat the cancer on our nation.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

MrsCoffee

(5,801 posts)
3. Mayor Pete is catching fire.
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 08:58 AM
Oct 2019

Warren just turned 70 and Sanders will be out of top three before end of month.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Response to highplainsdem (Original post)

 

Thekaspervote

(32,770 posts)
4. Interesting read! Thx highplainsdem for posting
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 09:02 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)
5. age and wisdom, why the indian chiefs were also the elders
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 09:08 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»It's No Coincidence That ...