Was there animosity between these two? This seemed to come out of the blue like an orange lightning bolt.

It's a fact that Gabbard is supported by Russian Twitter bots, that she has nothing but praise for Putin and Assad, and that she's been endorsed by David Duke and Steve Bannon.

It's easy to figure out she wasn't talking about Warren, Harris, Amy, or Williamson, in my opinion.

rightwing accusations.

in the upcoming election is "stirring the pot"?

Those who think that "we have enough trouble dealing with right wing accusations", would probably be better served if Van Jones stopped rubbing shoulders with the Trump boys and Tulsi stayed off Fox.

Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
v
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary
Stop FUCKING BASHING Hillary

Who does that leave?

to endorse Bernie Sanders. She felt the DNC treated Sanders unfairly and Hillary took it very personally, and clearly has not gotten over it.

thanks for clearing that up. By the way, listening to the Bernie rally now & loving it.

From: Darnell Strom
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:13 PM
To: Tulsi Gabbard (tulsi.gabbard@gmail.com<mailto:tulsi.gabbard@gmail.com&gt
Cc: Michael Kives
Subject: Disappointed

Representative Gabbard,

We were very disappointed to hear that you would resign your position with the DNC so you could endorse Bernie Sanders, a man who has never been a Democrat before. When we met over dinner a couple of years ago I was so impressed by your intellect, your passion, and commitment to getting things done on behalf of the American people. For you to endorse a man who has spent almost 40 years in public office with very few accomplishments, doesn't fall in line with what we previously thought of you. Hillary Clinton will be our party's nominee and you standing on ceremony to support the sinking Bernie Sanders ship is disrespectful to Hillary Clinton. A woman who has spent the vast majority of her life in public service and working on behalf of women, families, and the underserved.

You have called both myself and Michael Kives before about helping your campaign raise money, we no longer trust your judgement so will not be raising money for your campaign.

Darnell Strom & Michael Kives

I will say that Feb 29 was a little early to declare "Hillary Clinton will be our party's nominee." So clearly, whoever they are, they are writing from their own biased perspective.

and both had worked for and with Bill and Hillary Clinton in the past. Their email to Gabbard informing her that they were no longer willing to represent her was released by Wikileaks in the October 2016 dump.

I wonder why Wikileaks sought to weaponize an email to Gabbard right before the 2016 election?

I also wonder why Gabbard is such a staunch defender of Wikileaks and Assange? Isn't she aware of who they were working for in 2016?



https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211829730

As for her part, Gabbard certainly has her talking points down pat.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/10/10/tulsi-gabbard-considering-boycotting-october-debate/3928595002/

I don't think it's surprising that the Clinton camp was unhappy about Gabbard's leaving her DNC position to support Sanders. And that's certainly not an unbiased perspective.

concerning Strom and Kives who were executive agents at Creative Artist Agency.

Reliance on the gossip gleaned from personal emails stolen by pro-Russia agents, funneled through Wikileaks, and amplified ad infinitum by outlets like The Daily Caller is ill-advised.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3609

Secretary Clinton took it very personally and it's been a long-standing issue?

Do you have a source for that claim? Is that something Tulsi told Tucker?

From: Darnell Strom
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:13 PM
To: Tulsi Gabbard (tulsi.gabbard@gmail.com<mailto:tulsi.gabbard@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Kives
Subject: Disappointed

Representative Gabbard,

We were very disappointed to hear that you would resign your position with the DNC so you could endorse Bernie Sanders, a man who has never been a Democrat before. When we met over dinner a couple of years ago I was so impressed by your intellect, your passion, and commitment to getting things done on behalf of the American people. For you to endorse a man who has spent almost 40 years in public office with very few accomplishments, doesn't fall in line with what we previously thought of you. Hillary Clinton will be our party's nominee and you standing on ceremony to support the sinking Bernie Sanders ship is disrespectful to Hillary Clinton. A woman who has spent the vast majority of her life in public service and working on behalf of women, families, and the underserved.

You have called both myself and Michael Kives before about helping your campaign raise money, we no longer trust your judgement so will not be raising money for your campaign.

Darnell Strom & Michael Kives

You're quoting an email stolen from two executives at a private agency and then leaked by Russian operatives as an October surprise to help elect Trump. What does that have to do with the DNC?

Besides, you claimed that Secretary Clinton took it "very personally", not the DNC.

much less that she took it "very personally, and clearly has not gotten over it.", STOP posting personal opinions as fact. It is unproductive and only serves to be divisive here.

********************************************************************************

The bots are out and some of them have names we have seen before. Apparently some have entered the presidential race.

Heavensakes it’s Gabbard Who outed herself. She should have just shut up and pretended Hillary wasn’t talking about her.

Now Williamson outed herself.
Both with no chance of winning the Dem primary.

There will be a real fight over who will be this cycle’s Jill Stein.
In the running with Tulsky.
Pick wisely you stupid Russian fucks.

Go Joe Go!
Biden - Tru$$ia least favorite candidate

If you go to a Howdy Modi rally where tRump turns it into a campaign event.

I believe all three are crooked.

RWNJ’s. I’m sure they’re the reason both of them are still in the race.

should have never been opened, it does damage to the party & those who started this infighting should be ashamed of themselves.

since no one actually running would have been able to.

But no one can attack Tulsi Gabbard.

And make room for the real candidates.

Is that really how the "cool" candidates try to win over voters? Us against the establishmenht? It has become such a boring buzzword and excuse for bad poll numbers.
I know Bernie and Trump used that in 2016 but it's just stupid and poisons the atmosphere.

... so, in the great Hillary/Tulsi match-up, she sides with... the woman. I had no idea Hillary changed her gender. She still seems like an strong, attractive older woman, to me. Maybe I need glasses?

To Marianne for not being afraid to defend Tulsi

Sounds about right.

"Not much longer would she be sane ...
Cuz she heard it through the vortex...

honey, honey, yeah."

to endorse Sanders in 2016 because she believes propaganda smears that Clinton is a warmonger.

for being a woman, but for the things she said and did, which men could not get away with either. It never helps to play a card where it does not apply.