Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

Poiuyt

(18,125 posts)
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 07:38 PM Oct 2019

What did Professor Rachel Bitecofer mean when she said this about Bernie Sanders?

Looking ahead to the 2020 Electoral College map, my model delivers on two of the most critical elements of election forecasting: , that is, simplicity. It’s probably not lost on you, dear reader, that I am offering a forecast not for the presidential primary election, itself still in its infancy, but for the November 2020 general election that is some 16 months away. And I am offering a forecast free from all the trappings you are used to. There are no poll aggregators, no daily or weekly updates, no simple versus deluxe versions. Right now, there is not even a nominee! By and large, I don’t expect that the specific nominee the Democratic electorate chooses will matter all that much unless it ends up being a disruptor like Bernie Sanders.

https://cnu.edu/wasoncenter/2019/07/01-2020-election-forecast/


Bitecofer made news in 2018 by correctly predicting the midterm elections. She is now predicting a Democratic win in 2020 with a few caveats like the one mentioned above. Yes, Bernie tends to be a disrupter, but I don't see millions of people voting for trump just to avoid him.

Am I reading this correctly that she feels Bernie would send people to trump or keep them home on election day?
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What did Professor Rachel Bitecofer mean when she said this about Bernie Sanders? (Original Post) Poiuyt Oct 2019 OP
We're safe then. Little chance one nearing 80 and with two recent heart events... brush Oct 2019 #1
Two? There was the one that turned out to be a heart attack, what was the second? n/t thesquanderer Oct 2019 #4
The earlier time when he fainted and fell in the shower. brush Oct 2019 #7
Do you have a link to where it says Bernie "fainted" and fell in the shower? Uncle Joe Oct 2019 #14
Google it. It's no secret. He had a bandage on his forehead while campaigning. brush Oct 2019 #17
Likely an afib event. NurseJackie Oct 2019 #19
bernie/tulsi 2020 will prove her wrong lol nt msongs Oct 2019 #2
Wasn't this the same mood in 2016? Let's all enjoy the deja view. abqtommy Oct 2019 #3
Simply put, he's too polarizing/divisive. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Skid Rogue Oct 2019 #6
This isn't about Rachel Maddow. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #8
just googled..... Skid Rogue Oct 2019 #10
If Sanders is a disrupter, wouldn't Warren be as well? Lexblues Oct 2019 #9
No it is not a given that Warren would be the same as Sanders Fresh_Start Oct 2019 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Oct 2019 #12
around 24-25% of 2008 Clinton primary voters voted McCain in the general Celerity Oct 2019 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Oct 2019 #15
I think the message is we can't count on all primary voters aligning with our nominee aikoaiko Oct 2019 #16
It is neither deflection nor rationalisation. It is simple maths. nt Celerity Oct 2019 #18
 

brush

(53,787 posts)
1. We're safe then. Little chance one nearing 80 and with two recent heart events...
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 07:42 PM
Oct 2019

will be the candidate.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
4. Two? There was the one that turned out to be a heart attack, what was the second? n/t
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 10:31 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

brush

(53,787 posts)
7. The earlier time when he fainted and fell in the shower.
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 11:06 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Uncle Joe

(58,366 posts)
14. Do you have a link to where it says Bernie "fainted" and fell in the shower?
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:32 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

brush

(53,787 posts)
17. Google it. It's no secret. He had a bandage on his forehead while campaigning.
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 10:08 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
19. Likely an afib event.
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 06:25 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

msongs

(67,417 posts)
2. bernie/tulsi 2020 will prove her wrong lol nt
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 07:45 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
3. Wasn't this the same mood in 2016? Let's all enjoy the deja view.
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 08:12 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
5. Simply put, he's too polarizing/divisive.
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 10:37 PM
Oct 2019

For what it's worth, I wrote this about Bitecofer's relatively hopeful forecast: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212599797

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided

Response to Poiuyt (Original post)

 

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
8. This isn't about Rachel Maddow.
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 11:22 PM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Skid Rogue

(711 posts)
10. just googled.....
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 11:52 PM
Oct 2019

Gotcha. Thanks so much.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Lexblues

(180 posts)
9. If Sanders is a disrupter, wouldn't Warren be as well?
Sat Oct 19, 2019, 11:30 PM
Oct 2019

Her policies are very much similar to Bernie's.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
11. No it is not a given that Warren would be the same as Sanders
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 06:53 PM
Oct 2019

Sanders regularly blames the democratic party for the problems as well as blaming the republican party. In fact, Sanders would be perfectly happy if there were no democratic party to detract from his democratic socialism.

Warren is a democrat and doesn't want to burn the democratic party down.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Response to Poiuyt (Original post)

 

Celerity

(43,408 posts)
13. around 24-25% of 2008 Clinton primary voters voted McCain in the general
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 08:23 PM
Oct 2019

Around 30% total of Hillary 2008 primary voters did not vote for Obama in the general, around 24-25% voted for McCain, around 5% did not vote in the general. I was only 12 years old at the time, and living (where I grew up) in London, but I have read extensively on this subject, both informally and at university via my political science classes. It was a very, very bitter primary in 2008, as exemplified by the so-called PUMA effect and other disruptive events and forces. Obama overcame it via a truly massive turnout and historical rates of African-American votes, the latter of which (lower minority voter turnout and higher rates of A-A's, especially A-A men, voting Republican) hurt Hillary significantly in 2016 (see a large post I did on that subject here https://www.democraticunderground.com/128736610#post18 ).




https://isps.yale.edu/research/data/d130

https://sites.duke.edu/hillygus/files/2014/06/hendersonhillygustompsonPOQ.pdf



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/24/did-enough-bernie-sanders-supporters-vote-for-trump-to-cost-clinton-the-election/

Another useful comparison is to 2008, when the question was whether Clinton supporters would vote for Barack Obama or John McCain (R-Ariz.) Based on data from the 2008 Cooperative Campaign Analysis Project, a YouGov survey that also interviewed respondents multiple times during the campaign, 24 percent of people who supported Clinton in the primary as of March 2008 then reported voting for McCain in the general election.

An analysis of a different 2008 survey by the political scientists Michael Henderson, Sunshine Hillygus and Trevor Thompson produced a similar estimate: 25 percent. (Unsurprisingly, Clinton voters who supported McCain were more likely to have negative views of African Americans, relative to those who supported Obama.)

Thus, the 6 percent or 12 percent of Sanders supporters who may have supported Trump does not look especially large in comparison with these other examples.


snip


We can look at the 2016 Sanders primary supporters' numbers as well.

Obviously the 3rd party voters were a far smaller percentage in 2016 (it was around 8%) as 23%
of his 13,206,428 (and that number is actually around 13.75 -14 million, as it does not include popular vote totals from Iowa Caucuses (he got 85,055), Maine Caucuses, which has only district reps vote (2,226), Nevada Caucuses (9571) , North Dakota Caucuses (difficult to guess as they have delegates vote, and he had 253 in the districts), Washington (401,452 votes total for Sanders), Wyoming, or non-binding primary Nebraska primary (he got 37,744 votes)

is around 3.2 million votes. Stein only got 1,457,216 total votes (1.07%) nationwide. Also obviously, not every single one of her votes was a Bernie Dem voter. I will give number below of the percentage of Sanders 2016 primary voters who defected en toto below, but it was probably around 5% (If HALF her totals were Bernie voters) to 7% (if a full 70% of her total votes were Bernie primary voters who went Stein.) My guess based off 2012 numbers for her is that it was around 6%, and that turns out to be very close, as you wil see in the data below.

The danger when people show the total number numbers of Stein voters in the close states and say, 'Look, if you take ALL her votes and give them to Clinton, Clinton would have won easily!' is that a large chunk of her total voters would never vote for anything but the Green Party candidate, they are never Democratic or Republican voters, except for the one-off freak candidacy of Bernie in the primaries. Again, the real danger for us this time, in 2020 is that THIS group of 2020 Bernie voters are far, far less Democratic (many very hostile to us in fact) and far, far more radical than he had in 2016, so the haemorrhage is going to be far greater than in 2016 I fear.

so now lets drill down further


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/24/did-enough-bernie-sanders-supporters-vote-for-trump-to-cost-clinton-the-election/

How many Sanders voters voted for Donald Trump?

Two surveys estimate that 12 percent of Sanders voters voted for Trump. A third survey suggests it was 6 percent.

First, the political scientist Brian Schaffner analyzed the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, which was conducted by YouGov and interviewed 64,600 Americans in October-November 2016. In that survey, Schaffner found that 12 percent of people who voted in the primary and reported voting for Sanders also voted in November and reported voting for Trump.

Schaffner examined only voters whose turnout in the primary and general election could be validated using voter file data. This excludes people who said they voted but actually did not — although it also excludes people who voted in caucuses or party-run primaries, for which validated turnout data are not as readily available.

Second, the same 12 percent figure emerges in the 2016 VOTER Survey, which was also conducted by YouGov and overseen by the Democracy Fund Voter Study Group (of which I am research director). In 2016, this survey interviewed 8,000 respondents in July, when they were asked their primary vote preference, and then in December, when they were asked their general election preference. This has the advantage of measuring primary preference closer to the primaries themselves and then tracking people over time. But their turnout in both elections has not been validated as of yet.

The third survey is the RAND Presidential Election Panel Survey, which interviewed the same group of about 3,000 Americans six times during the campaign. Again, this survey has the advantage of tracking voters over time, but nobody’s turnout has been validated. Among voters who reported supporting Sanders as of March 2016, 6 percent then reported voting for Trump in November.

snip

I think the numbers of Bernie to Trump voters was probably around 10% overall (although I will show the numbers with 12% too). That 10% number is given here That link has a lot more data and goes into great depth, but at 10% Trump from Bernie defection rates, that would have swung the election to Hillary EXCEPT for one massive thing. The problem with saying those Berner to Trump voters made the diifrent completely ignores the Republican to Democratic switchers, as well. You cannot just pull out one set of switchers. Trump lost some support, too, of course. 34% of Kasich primary voters voted for Clinton. And 11% of Rubio primary voters did the same. Kasich had 4,290,448 votes, so 34% of that yields 1,458,752 Rethugs switching to Clinton, OR MORE than ALL of Bernie to Trump votes. Cruz had 7,822,100 Votes, so 11% of that yields 860,431 Rethug switches to Hillary. That is more votes than Bernie to Stein votes, or damn close. Next up is Rubio voters, who defected at a rate of 10%. Rubio had 3,515,576 votes, so that yields 351,558 Rehug to Hillary defections.

Add up those 3 numbers you get 2,670,741 Republican primary to Hillary general defection votes. That is just from THREE of losers, there were many other losing Repug smaller candidates who also had switchers to Clinton. The total was probably around 3 million Republican to Hillary switches.

If you take the 16% of Bernies 14 million primary votes (10% to Trump, 6% to Stein) that yields 2,240,000 Bernie to Trump defections, or far less than went the other way (Rethug to Clinton). In fact, lets say EVERY single Stein voter was a Bernie defector (Literally impossible in reality but lets do it just for fun). That yields 2,857,216 or so, which is still less than the total Rethug to Clinton total switches (counting all Repug primary voters).

I will now deal with last 2 categories. Non voters in the general and then the Gary Johnson general voters.

As for Sanders primary voters who didn't vote at all, it was only 3.5%. Hillary in 2008 had 5% of her primary voters not vote in the General. 5% of Republican primary voters didnt vote in the general.

A total of 8% went 3rd party from Bernie, so taking out Steins 6% (which I used in the calculation above) that leaves 2% who went to Johnson. That yields 280,000 votes. So the grand total of Bernie to other parties voters is 2,520,000 if you take the 10% to Trump number, or 2,800,000 if you give Trump a 12% Defection rate from Sanders primary. Still less than just Rethug primary voters who switched to Hillary. That is not even counting at all the Trump or any other candidates in the Rethug primary to Stein and especially Trump to Johnson switchers. Nor does it count the Rethug to Evan McMullin 732,273 votes (almost none came from Hillary or Bernie). Johnson took in a massive 4,489,233 votes. If only a third of the rate (so 4%, although I think it was higher, as he had 3 MILLION more votes than in 2012) defected from the Rethugs than did Bernie to Trump voters, that means Trump lost another 1,247,354 votes as there where 31,183,841 total votes cast in the Republican primaries.

That means over 5 MILLION defections from Trump to Hillary and 3rd parties, versus around 2.5m to 2.8 million defections away from Hillary via Bernie primary voters. Large net plus for Sec Clinton

The overall rate for Bernie 2016 primary voters who didn't vote for Sec Clinton and who voted for either Trump, Stein etc or didn't vote at all was 21.5% to 23.5% (depending if you give Trump 10% or 12% of their vote) versus a 30% defection (most all to McCain)/non vote rate for Hillary primary voters in 2008. The straight Democratic vote in the Primary to Rethug in the General (so thr worst possible type of defection as it both takes away and adds to the opponent) was twice as high (at least) for Hillary 2008 voters as it was for 2016 Sanders voters.
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden

Response to Celerity (Reply #13)

 

aikoaiko

(34,172 posts)
16. I think the message is we can't count on all primary voters aligning with our nominee
Sun Oct 20, 2019, 09:28 PM
Oct 2019

No one gets all the votes.

We were fortunate that Obama could attract more than those who defected.

Not so much in 2016.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Celerity

(43,408 posts)
18. It is neither deflection nor rationalisation. It is simple maths. nt
Mon Oct 21, 2019, 12:44 AM
Oct 2019
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»What did Professor Rachel...