Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Joe BidenCongratulations to our presumptive Democratic nominee, Joe Biden!
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 07:24 PM Dec 2019

Researchers Find A Remarkable Ripple Effect When You Give Cash To Poor Families

Yang's idea is not crazy or impossible or ahead of its time. It's necessary. Better to be proactive than reactive. This will be revolutionary, and I'd rather it be democrats that implement it.




Over the past decade there has been a surge of interest in a novel approach to helping the world's poor: Instead of giving them goods like food or services like job training, just hand out cash — with no strings attached. Now a major new study suggests that people who get the aid aren't the only ones who benefit.

Edward Miguel, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, and a co-author of the study, says that until now, research on cash aid has almost exclusively focused on the impact on those receiving the aid. And a wealth of research suggests that when families are given the power to decide how to spend it, they manage the money in ways that improve their overall well-being: Kids get more schooling; the family's nutrition and health improves.

But Miguel says that "as nonprofits and governments are ramping up cash aid, it becomes more and more important to understand the broader economy-wide consequences."

In particular, there has been rising concern about the potential impact on the wider community — the people who are not getting the aid. A lot of them may be barely out of poverty themselves.

(3-minute listen at link)

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/12/02/781152563/researchers-find-a-remarkable-ripple-effect-when-you-give-cash-to-poor-families
If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Researchers Find A Remarkable Ripple Effect When You Give Cash To Poor Families (Original Post) redqueen Dec 2019 OP
Amazing how a real story once proven Wellstone ruled Dec 2019 #1
Fascinating underpants Dec 2019 #2
Let's keep saying it. catrose Dec 2019 #3
Yes this is what I was thought in Econ 101 forty years ago. Big Blue Marble Dec 2019 #7
Truly amazing. Hey, maybe you were one of my students, if you were in Oklahoma. catrose Dec 2019 #8
we should do this for farmers, like right now. mopinko Dec 2019 #4
The advantage to doing it for everyone redqueen Dec 2019 #5
there you go w facts. mopinko Dec 2019 #6
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. Amazing how a real story once proven
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 07:29 PM
Dec 2019

factual back in the Depression Era comes back once again. Rural Economics and Agriculture use to be a fact that a Farmers dollar turned seven times on Main Street.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

catrose

(5,073 posts)
3. Let's keep saying it.
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 07:44 PM
Dec 2019

I was teaching this in my college lasses decades ago, and it was old news then. 40 years of Republican rule makes people forget.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

Big Blue Marble

(5,150 posts)
7. Yes this is what I was thought in Econ 101 forty years ago.
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:28 PM
Dec 2019

Transfer payments support the economic fabric of a community. The poor will spend their money quickly due
to needs and circulation the wealth. Amazing, isn't it they needed a new study to show the benefits of
supporting everyone in our society.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Joe Biden
 

catrose

(5,073 posts)
8. Truly amazing. Hey, maybe you were one of my students, if you were in Oklahoma.
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 10:23 PM
Dec 2019

I quit teaching economics when Reagan was elected because the textbook company sent a Reagonomics supplement, basically saying we couldn't laugh at supply-side economics anymore. I've never stopped laughing, though it's mixed up with sobbing now.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
4. we should do this for farmers, like right now.
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 07:44 PM
Dec 2019

esp people like dairy farmers, orchards, etc, that have long term investments.
just send out checks by zipcode. we are facing such an emergency.

farmers can do a lot to stop climate change, but not if we run them all out of business now.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
5. The advantage to doing it for everyone
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:15 PM
Dec 2019

is that that way, everyone has a vested interest. It's much harder to kill programs like that, and the effect on the economy is that much bigger.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
 

mopinko

(70,206 posts)
6. there you go w facts.
Mon Dec 2, 2019, 09:26 PM
Dec 2019

yeah, that part is a true fact, but i dont think you sell it as universal.
this is murika.

you look the needs of communities, and those that can be helped by this w little downside should get it. changing things like sec 8 and tanf etc, for, here, this is a poor part of the economy, so we're just gonna send in some seed money.
imho, you focus on supporting children. lots of single mom's in this zip? send checks. lots of little kids in this zip? send checks.
then target women. lots of disabled or elderly in this little town w few paid caregivers? big chunk of the economy in this town resting on low wage workers, likely women? send checks.
then families. you're a family dairy farmer w less than 100 cows? send checks.
and that's as far as that goes. biggest unit is the family.

i think much can be done to make it both wide spread but also targeted. nothing like the individual hell you must walk through now to get any help. community/family based.

If I were to vote in a presidential
primary today, I would vote for:
Undecided
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Democratic Primaries»Researchers Find A Remark...